Ambulatory pH-Impedance Findings Confirm That Grade B Esophagitis Provides Objective Diagnosis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

INTRODUCTION: The Lyon Consensus designates Los Angeles (LA) grade C/D esophagitis or acid exposure time (AET) >6% on impedance-pH monitoring (MII-pH) as conclusive for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We aimed to evaluate proportions with objective GERD among symptomatic patients with LA grade A, B, and C esophagitis on endoscopy. METHODS: Demographics, clinical data, endoscopy findings, and objective proton-pump inhibitor response were collected from symptomatic prospectively enrolled patients from 2 referral centers. Off-therapy MII-pH parameters included AET, number of reflux episodes, mean nocturnal baseline impedance, and postreflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index. Objective GERD evidence was compared between LA grades. RESULTS: Of 155 patients (LA grade A: 74 patients, B: 61 patients, and C: 20 patients), demographics and presentation were similar across LA grades. AET >6% was seen in 1.4%, 52.5%, and 75%, respectively, in LA grades A, B, and C. Using additional MII-pH metrics, an additional 16.2% with LA grade A and 47.5% with LA grade B esophagitis had AET 4%–6% with low mean nocturnal baseline impedance and postreflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index; there were no additional gains using the number of reflux episodes or symptom-reflux association metrics. Compared with LA grade C (100% conclusive GERD based on endoscopic findings), 100% of LA grade B esophagitis also had objective GERD but only 17.6% with LA grade A esophagitis (P < 0.001 compared with each). Proton-pump inhibitor response was comparable between LA grades B and C (74% and 70%, respectively) but low in LA grade A (39%, P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Grade B esophagitis indicates an objective diagnosis of GERD.

[1]  E. Savarino,et al.  Comparison of acid‐lowering drugs for endoscopy negative reflux disease: Systematic review and network Meta‐Analysis , 2022, Neurogastroenterology and motility : the official journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society.

[2]  E. Savarino,et al.  Clinical use of mean nocturnal baseline impedance and post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index for the diagnosis of gastro-esophageal reflux disease , 2022, Esophagus.

[3]  E. Savarino,et al.  Chicago classification v4.0 protocol improves specificity and accuracy of diagnosis of oesophagogastric junction outflow obstruction , 2022, Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[4]  T. Shimosegawa,et al.  Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for gastroesophageal reflux disease 2021 , 2022, Journal of Gastroenterology.

[5]  C. Hassan,et al.  Systematic review with meta‐analysis: artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of oesophageal diseases , 2022, Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[6]  S. Spechler,et al.  ACG Clinical Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. , 2021, The American journal of gastroenterology.

[7]  E. Savarino,et al.  Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis of Upper Gastrointestinal Diseases , 2021, Journal of clinical gastroenterology.

[8]  Ming-Hseng Tseng,et al.  A Deep Learning Model for Classification of Endoscopic Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease , 2021, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[9]  J. Dunn,et al.  Validation of the Lyon classification for GORD diagnosis: acid exposure time assessed by prolonged wireless pH monitoring in healthy controls and patients with erosive oesophagitis , 2021, Gut.

[10]  E. Savarino,et al.  A SIGE-SINGEM-AIGO technical review on the clinical use of esophageal reflux monitoring. , 2020, Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver.

[11]  E. Savarino,et al.  Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and pharmacological treatment of gastro-esophageal reflux disease , 2020, Expert review of clinical pharmacology.

[12]  Scott B. Johnson,et al.  How to select patients for antireflux surgery? The ICARUS guidelines (international consensus regarding preoperative examinations and clinical characteristics assessment to select adult patients for antireflux surgery) , 2019, Gut.

[13]  E. Savarino,et al.  Indications and interpretation of esophageal function testing , 2018, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[14]  E. Savarino,et al.  Modern diagnosis of GERD: the Lyon Consensus , 2018, Gut.

[15]  G. Boeckxstaens,et al.  Ambulatory reflux monitoring for diagnosis of gastro‐esophageal reflux disease: Update of the Porto consensus and recommendations from an international consensus group , 2017, Neurogastroenterology and motility : the official journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society.

[16]  R. Hunt,et al.  World Gastroenterology Organisation Global Guidelines: GERD Global Perspective on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. , 2017, Journal of clinical gastroenterology.

[17]  E. Savarino,et al.  Practice guidelines on the use of esophageal manometry - A GISMAD-SIGE-AIGO medical position statement. , 2016, Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver.

[18]  R. Odze,et al.  Association of Acute Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease With Esophageal Histologic Changes. , 2016, JAMA.

[19]  L. Frazzoni,et al.  Impairment of chemical clearance is relevant to the pathogenesis of refractory reflux oesophagitis. , 2014, Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver.

[20]  E. Savarino,et al.  Esophageal baseline impedance levels in patients with pathophysiological characteristics of functional heartburn , 2014, Neurogastroenterology and motility : the official journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society.

[21]  Eun Soo Kim,et al.  Endoscopic Experience Improves Interobserver Agreement in the Grading of Esophagitis by Los Angeles Classification: Conventional Endoscopy and Optimal Band Image System , 2013, Gut and liver.

[22]  L. Swanstrom,et al.  Preoperative diagnostic workup before antireflux surgery: an evidence and experience-based consensus of the Esophageal Diagnostic Advisory Panel. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[23]  Christopher C Winchester,et al.  Update on the epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review , 2013, Gut.

[24]  E. Savarino,et al.  NERD: an umbrella term including heterogeneous subpopulations , 2013, Nature Reviews Gastroenterology &Hepatology.

[25]  E. Savarino,et al.  Alginate controls heartburn in patients with erosive and nonerosive reflux disease. , 2012, World journal of gastroenterology.

[26]  Yuichiro Tanaka,et al.  Endoscopic Reflux Esophagitis and Helicobacter pylori Infection in Young Healthy Japanese Volunteers , 2012, Digestion.

[27]  E. Savarino,et al.  Characteristics of Reflux Episodes and Symptom Association in Patients With Erosive Esophagitis and Nonerosive Reflux Disease: Study Using Combined Impedance–pH Off Therapy , 2010, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[28]  A. Smout,et al.  Relationship between gastro‐oesophageal reflux pattern and severity of mucosal damage , 2009, Neurogastroenterology and motility : the official journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society.

[29]  D. Morgan,et al.  The Burden of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, 2006 , 2006, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[30]  J. Dent,et al.  The Montreal Definition and Classification of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Global Evidence-Based Consensus , 2006, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[31]  E. Savarino,et al.  Normal values of 24-h ambulatory intraluminal impedance combined with pH-metry in subjects eating a Mediterranean diet. , 2006, Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver.

[32]  M. Vieth,et al.  High prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms and esophagitis with or without symptoms in the general adult Swedish population: A Kalixanda study report , 2005, Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology.

[33]  J. Pandolfino,et al.  Comparison of inter- and intraobserver consistency for grading of esophagitis by expert and trainee endoscopists. , 2002, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[34]  Richard E. Sampliner,et al.  Effect of Ambulatory 24-Hour Esophageal pH Monitoring on Reflux-Provoking Activities , 1999, Digestive Diseases and Sciences.

[35]  A. Blum,et al.  Endoscopic assessment of oesophagitis: clinical and functional correlates and further validation of the Los Angeles classification , 1999, Gut.

[36]  E. Savarino,et al.  Analyses of the Post-reflux Swallow-induced Peristaltic Wave Index and Nocturnal Baseline Impedance Parameters Increase the Diagnostic Yield of Impedance-pH Monitoring of Patients With Reflux Disease. , 2016, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[37]  R. Malekzadeh,et al.  Inter- and intra-observer variability of the Los Angeles classification: a reassessment. , 2007, Archives of Iranian medicine.