A Comparative Study of Density of Obturated Root Canals by Conventional and Mechanical Lateral Condensation Techniques

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the weight of root canal filling material used in a new lateral condensation technique named mechanical lateral condensation (MLC) with that of conventional lateral condensation technique (LC). This new technique uses reciprocal handpiece. Methods: In this experimental study, 40 human extracted straight canine teeth were used. After crown amputation, root canals were prepared with 18 mm in length. The teeth were randomly divided into four experimental groups; each group was consisting of 10 teeth. The teeth in groups IA and IB were filled by LC technique. The teeth in groups IIA and IIB were filled by MLC technique and using a finger spreader that placed in a reciprocating-action handpiece to laterally condense cold gutta-percha, creating space for accessory cones. All of the roots were weighted before and after obturation and the difference demonstrated the weight of gutta-percha mass. The data were analyzed by t-test. Results: The mean weight for MLC obturations was 10.82 ± 0.025 g compared with 7.37 ± 0.035 g for that of LC technique. The difference was statistically significant (P = 0.001). Conclusion: This study showed that MLC technique requires more gutta-percha mass than LC technique.

[1]  D. Marx,et al.  Percentage of canals filled in apical cross sections - an in vitro study of seven obturation techniques. , 2004, International endodontic journal.

[2]  Mahmoud Torabinejad,et al.  Clinical implications of the smear layer in endodontics: a review. , 2002, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[3]  E. Odgaard,et al.  Effect of spreader and accessory cone size on density of obturation using conventional or mechanical lateral condensation. , 2001, Journal of endodontics.

[4]  E. Odgaard,et al.  A description of an alternative method of lateral condensation and a comparison of the ability to obturate canals using mechanical or traditional lateral condensation. , 2000, Journal of endodontics.

[5]  P. Wesselink,et al.  Sealer distribution in root canals obturated by three techniques. , 2000, International endodontic journal.

[6]  P. Wesselink,et al.  Effect of sealer thickness on long-term sealing ability: a 2-year follow-up study. , 1997, International endodontic journal.

[7]  J. Kulild,et al.  Improved density of gutta-percha after warm lateral condensation. , 1993, Journal of endodontics.

[8]  S. K. Thoden van Velzen,et al.  Thermomechanical compaction of gutta-percha. I. A comparison of several compaction procedures. , 1986, International endodontic journal.

[9]  D. D. Peters.  Two-year in vitro solubility evaluation of four Gutta-percha sealer obturation techniques. , 1986, Journal of endodontics.

[10]  J. Hollinger,et al.  A comparison of the area of the canal space occupied by gutta-percha following four gutta-percha obturation techniques using Procosol sealer. , 1985, Journal of endodontics.

[11]  D. D. Peters,et al.  Comparison of gutta-percha filling techniques, compaction (mechanical), vertical (warm), and lateral condensation techniques, Part 1. , 1981, Journal of endodontics.

[12]  F. Yee,et al.  Three-dimensional obturation of the root canal using injection-molded, thermoplasticized dental gutta-percha. , 1977, Journal of endodontics.

[13]  S. Seltzer,et al.  Scanning electron microscopic examination of root canal filling materials. , 1976, Journal of endodontics.

[14]  M. Goldman,et al.  Gutta-percha root canal fillings. An in vitro analysis. I. , 1973, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[15]  H Schilder,et al.  Filling root canals in three dimensions. , 1967, Dental clinics of North America.