Hybrid metaheuristics for multi-objective design of water distribution systems

Multi-objective design of Water Distribution Systems (WDSs) has received considerable attention in the past. Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) are popular in tackling this problem due to their ability to approach the true Pareto-optimal front (PF) in a single run. Recently, several hybrid metaheuristics based on MOEAs have been proposed and validated on test problems. Among these algorithms, AMALGAM and MOHO are two noteworthy representatives which mix their constituent algorithms in contrasting fashion. In this paper, they are employed to solve a wide range of benchmark design problems against another state-of-the-art algorithm, namely NSGA-II. The design task is formulated as a bi-objective optimisation problem taking cost and network resilience into account. The performance of three algorithms is assessed via normalised hypervolume indicator. The results demonstrate that AMALGAM is superior to MOHO and NSGA-II in terms of convergence and diversity on the networks of small-to-medium size; however, for larger networks, the performance of hybrid algorithms deteriorates as they lose their adaptive capabilities. Future improvement and/or redesign on hybrid algorithms should not only adopt the strategies of adaptive portfolios of sub-algorithms and global information sharing, but also prevent the deterioration mainly caused by imbalance of constituent algorithms.

[1]  Bryan A. Tolson,et al.  Dynamically dimensioned search algorithm for computationally efficient watershed model calibration , 2007 .

[2]  Dragan Savic,et al.  Evolutionary multi-objective optimization of the design and operation of water distribution network: total cost vs. reliability vs. water quality , 2006 .

[3]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[4]  Enrico Creaco,et al.  Fast network multi-objective design algorithm combined with an a posteriori procedure for reliability evaluation under various operational scenarios , 2012 .

[5]  Edward Keedwell,et al.  More choices in water system design through hybrid optimisation , 2003 .

[6]  Larry W. Mays,et al.  Battle of the network models: Epilogue , 1987 .

[7]  Qi Wang,et al.  Hybrid optimisation algorithms for two-objective design of water distribution systems , 2014 .

[8]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms , 2001, Wiley-Interscience series in systems and optimization.

[9]  T. Devi Prasad,et al.  Multiobjective Genetic Algorithms for Design of Water Distribution Networks , 2004 .

[10]  Xiaolei Dong,et al.  A comparative study of differential evolution and genetic algorithms for optimizing the design of water distribution systems , 2012 .

[11]  Jasper A Vrugt,et al.  Improved evolutionary optimization from genetically adaptive multimethod search , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Ezio Todini,et al.  Looped water distribution networks design using a resilience index based heuristic approach , 2000 .

[13]  Edward Keedwell,et al.  Introducing more choices (flexibility) in the upgrading of water distribution networks: the New York city tunnel network example , 2005 .

[14]  Joseph R. Kasprzyk,et al.  Optimal Design of Water Distribution Systems Using Many-Objective Visual Analytics , 2013 .

[15]  Zoran Kapelan,et al.  Reducing the Complexity of Multiobjective Water Distribution System Optimization through Global Sensitivity Analysis , 2012 .

[16]  Shahryar Rahnamayan,et al.  A novel population initialization method for accelerating evolutionary algorithms , 2007, Comput. Math. Appl..

[17]  Jakobus E. van Zyl,et al.  Operational Optimization of Water Distribution Systems using a Hybrid Genetic Algorithm , 2004 .

[18]  R. Farmani,et al.  Evolutionary multi-objective optimization in water distribution network design , 2005 .

[19]  Edward Keedwell,et al.  Novel cellular automata approach to optimal water distribution network design , 2006 .

[20]  Marco Laumanns,et al.  SPEA2: Improving the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm For Multiobjective Optimization , 2002 .

[21]  Milan Cisty Hybrid Genetic Algorithm and Linear Programming Method for Least-Cost Design of Water Distribution Systems , 2010 .

[22]  Dragan Savic,et al.  Trade-off between Total Cost and Reliability for Anytown Water Distribution Network , 2005 .

[23]  Darian Raad,et al.  Robust multi-objective optimization for water distribution system design using a meta-metaheuristic , 2009, Int. Trans. Oper. Res..

[24]  El-Ghazali Talbi,et al.  A Taxonomy of Hybrid Metaheuristics , 2002, J. Heuristics.

[25]  Lothar Thiele,et al.  Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach , 1999, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[26]  George S. Dulikravich,et al.  Multi-Objective Hybrid Evolutionary Optimization with Automatic Switching Among Constituent Algorithms , 2008 .

[27]  David H. Wolpert,et al.  No free lunch theorems for optimization , 1997, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[28]  Aaron C. Zecchin,et al.  Hybrid discrete dynamically dimensioned search (HD‐DDS) algorithm for water distribution system design optimization , 2009 .

[29]  Paul Bratley,et al.  Algorithm 659: Implementing Sobol's quasirandom sequence generator , 1988, TOMS.

[30]  H. Haario,et al.  An adaptive Metropolis algorithm , 2001 .

[31]  Darian Nicholas Raad,et al.  Multi-objective optimisation of water distribution systems design using metaheuristics , 2011 .

[32]  Vladan Babovic,et al.  A Real Options Approach to the Design and Architecture of Water Supply Systems Using Innovative Water Technologies Under Uncertainty , 2012 .

[33]  Tiku T. Tanyimboh,et al.  Entropy based design of "Anytown" water distribution network , 2009 .