High-Fidelity Numerical Simulation of a Chevron Nozzle Jet Flow

We report results from the simulation of a moderate Reynolds number cold jet flow exhausting from a chevron nozzle with six symmetric chevrons that have an approximately 18-degree penetration angle. The flow inside the nozzle geometry and the free jet flow outside are computed simultaneously by a high-order accurate, multi-block, large eddy simulation code with overset grid capability. The simulation is performed on 400 million grid points using 2048 processor cores in parallel. The main emphasis of the simulation is to compute the jet flow in maximum detail possible and accurately capture the physical processes that lead to noise generation. It is especially critical to capture the enhanced shear layer mixing due to chevrons that takes place within the first few diameters downstream of the nozzle exit. Our calculations resolve the jet flow field at an unprecedented level of detail. Despite some issues such as an order of magnitude lower simulation Reynolds number (relative to experimental value) and unknown turbulence intensity levels within the experimental nozzle, it is shown that both the near-field jet turbulence and far-field noise predictions are in good agreement with the experimental measurements. Because of the enormous number of grid points required to resolve the near-nozzle region, the computational domain size is constrained to ten nozzle exit diameters downstream of nozzle exit by the limited computational resources. As a result, not all of the low frequency generating noise sources are resolved in the calculation, resulting in some errors in the low frequency range of the predicted noise spectrum. Nevertheless, it is shown that the high frequency noise generation in the near-nozzle region is predicted quite well.

[1]  Russell H. Thomas,et al.  Computational Analysis of a Chevron Nozzle Uniquely Tailored for Propulsion Airframe Aeroacoustics , 2006 .

[2]  Philippe R. Spalart,et al.  Noise Prediction for Increasingly Complex Jets. Part II: Applications , 2005 .

[3]  Philippe R. Spalart,et al.  Reprint of: LES-Based Evaluation of a Microjet Noise Reduction Concept in Static and Flight Conditions , 2010 .

[4]  T. Lund,et al.  Generation of Turbulent Inflow Data for Spatially-Developing Boundary Layer Simulations , 1998 .

[5]  Andrey Garbaruk,et al.  Further Steps in LES-Based Noise Prediction for Complex Jets , 2006 .

[6]  Miguel R. Visbal,et al.  Implicit Large Eddy Simulations Using a High-Order Overset Grid Solver , 2004 .

[7]  M. Yousuff Hussaini,et al.  Investigation of high frequency noise generation in the near-nozzle region of a jet using large eddy simulation , 2007 .

[8]  Anjaneyulu Krothapalli,et al.  The effect of streamwise vortices on the aeroacoustics of a Mach 0.9 jet , 2007, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[9]  Miguel R. Visbal,et al.  Large-Eddy Simulation on Curvilinear Grids Using Compact Differencing and Filtering Schemes , 2002 .

[10]  S. Lele Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution , 1992 .

[11]  D. Bodony,et al.  Reprint of:Aeroacoustic predictions in complex geometries , 2010 .

[12]  P. Spalart Direct simulation of a turbulent boundary layer up to Rθ = 1410 , 1988, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[13]  M. Yousuff Hussaini,et al.  Adaptive mesh refinement for chevron nozzle jet flows , 2010 .

[14]  Philippe R. Spalart,et al.  LES-based evaluation of a microjet noise reduction concept in static and flight conditions , 2010 .

[15]  V. Babu,et al.  Numerical predictions of noise due to subsonic jets from nozzles with and without chevrons , 2009 .

[16]  A. Lyrintzis,et al.  3-D large eddy simulation for jet aeroacoustics , 2003 .

[17]  M. Yousuff Hussaini,et al.  Large-Eddy Simulation of a Wing Tip Vortex on Overset Grids , 2006 .

[18]  Philip E. Morgan,et al.  An Implicit LES Approach Based on High-order Compact Differencing and Filtering Schemes (Invited) , 2003 .

[19]  A. Lyrintzis Surface Integral Methods in Computational Aeroacoustics—From the (CFD) Near-Field to the (Acoustic) Far-Field , 2003 .

[20]  T. Balsa,et al.  High Velocity Jet Noise Source Location and Reduction. Task 2. Theoretical Developments and Basic Experiments. , 1978 .

[21]  Scott E. Sherer,et al.  High-order compact finite-difference methods on general overset grids , 2005 .

[22]  M. Visbal VERY HIGH-ORDER SPATIALLY IMPLICIT SCHEMES FOR COMPUTATIONAL ACOUSTICS ON CURVILINEAR MESHES , 2001 .

[23]  K. Srinivasan,et al.  Aeroacoustic Studies of Beveled and Asymmetric-Chevron Nozzles , 2009 .

[24]  Thomas H. Pulliam,et al.  Artificial Dissipation Models for the Euler Equations , 1985 .

[25]  Daniel J. Bodony,et al.  Aeroacoustic predictions in complex geometries , 2010 .

[26]  R. F. Warming,et al.  An Implicit Factored Scheme for the Compressible Navier-Stokes Equations , 1977 .

[27]  D. A. Lyubimov,et al.  The application of hybrid RANS/ILES approach for the investigation of the effect of nozzle geometry and mode of efflux on the characteristics of turbulence of exhaust jets , 2009 .

[28]  James Bridges,et al.  Acoustic Efficiency of Azimuthal Modes in Jet Noise using Chevron Nozzles , 2006 .

[29]  Ephraim Gutmark,et al.  Large-Eddy Simulations of Imperfectly Expanded Jets from a Chevron Nozzle , 2009 .

[30]  Ephraim Gutmark,et al.  ACOUSTIC EFFECT of CHEVRONS on JETs Exiting Conical C-D NOZZLES , 2009 .

[31]  D. Spalding A Single Formula for the “Law of the Wall” , 1961 .

[32]  Andrey Garbaruk,et al.  Analysis of Jet-Noise-Reduction Concepts by Large-Eddy Simulation , 2007 .

[33]  Miguel R. Visbal,et al.  A time‐implicit high‐order compact differencing and filtering scheme for large‐eddy simulation , 2003 .

[34]  J. Szpunar,et al.  Part II applications , 2003 .

[35]  Graham Ashcroft,et al.  Optimized prefactored compact schemes , 2003 .

[36]  Ali Uzun,et al.  Simulation of Noise Generation in Near-Nozzle Region of a Chevron Nozzle Jet , 2009 .

[37]  Foluso Ladeinde,et al.  Supersonic Jet Noise from Round and Chevron Nozzles: Experimental Studies , 2009 .

[38]  On Boundary Conditions for Acoustic Computations in Non-Uniform Mean Flows , 1997 .

[39]  D. Gaitonde,et al.  Pade-Type Higher-Order Boundary Filters for the Navier-Stokes Equations , 2000 .

[40]  Ephraim Gutmark,et al.  Far-Field Acoustic Investigation into Chevron Nozzle Mechanisms and Trends , 2005 .

[41]  Clifford A. Brown,et al.  Parametric Testing of Chevrons on Single Flow Hot Jets , 2004 .

[42]  Anastasios S. Lyrintzis,et al.  Application of Compact Schemes to Large Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Jets , 2004, J. Sci. Comput..

[43]  A. Khavaran Role of anisotropy in turbulent mixing noise , 1999 .

[44]  Duck-Joo Lee,et al.  Generalized Characteristic Boundary Conditions for Computational Aeroacoustics, Part 2 , 2000 .

[45]  Ephraim Gutmark,et al.  Near-Field Investigation of Chevron Nozzle Mechanisms , 2008 .

[46]  D. A. Lyubimov,et al.  Noise Predictions for Chevron Nozzle Flows , 2006 .

[47]  John A. Ekaterinaris,et al.  Regular Article: Implicit, High-Resolution, Compact Schemes for Gas Dynamics and Aeroacoustics , 1999 .

[48]  A. Lyrintzis,et al.  Coupling of Integral Acoustics Methods with LES for Jet Noise Prediction , 2004 .