The Application of the Viable Systems Model to Information Technology Governance

Information technology governance has become a key issue for organizations as IT decision-making authority and responsibility is devolved away from a central IT function to local IT units and increasingly out of the remit of IT specialists altogether. Research to date has either been conceptual treatises on the issue, or recounts the structures and mechanisms that are currently in place in the organizations studied, even though these may have emerged rather than having been explicitly planned. This paper reports on research that is exploring how to describe, diagnose, and design appropriate IT governance structures. Using a participatory research design, where researchers and practitioners are both co-subjects and coresearchers in the research process, it proposes Beer’s viable systems model (VSM) as a guiding framework in considering IT governance. It illustrates how the VSM-influenced IT governance model can be used to describe, diagnose, and design an effective governance structure.

[1]  The Challenges of Complex IT Projects , 2004 .

[2]  Clive H. Elphick,et al.  Brain of the Firm , 1981 .

[3]  Herbert A. Simon.  The new science of management decision. , 1960 .

[4]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Key Issues for IT Executives , 2004, MIS Q. Executive.

[5]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Research Commentary: The Organizing Logic for an Enterprise's IT Activities in the Digital Era - A Prognosis of Practice and a Call for Research , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[6]  Guildford Gu.  EXPERIENCE AND METHOD An Inquiry into the Concept of Experiential Research , 1971 .

[7]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The new science of management decision , 1960 .

[8]  David Simms,et al.  The Heart of Enterprise , 1980 .

[9]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Arrangements for Information Technology Governance: A Theory of Multiple Contingencies , 1999, MIS Q..

[10]  R. Peterson.  Crafting Information Technology Governance , 2004 .

[11]  P. Reason.  Integrating Action and Reflection Through Co-Operative Inquiry , 1999 .

[12]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[13]  Carol V. Brown.  Horizontal Mechanisms Under Differing IS Organization Contexts , 1999, MIS Q..

[14]  J. Peppard.  Information management in the global enterprise: an organising framework , 1999 .

[15]  P. Weill,et al.  IT Governance , 2017 .

[16]  Norbert Wiener,et al.  Cybernetics: Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. , 1949 .

[17]  Viktor Mikhaĭlovich Glushkov,et al.  An Introduction to Cybernetics , 1957, The Mathematical Gazette.

[18]  Pieter M. A. Ribbers,et al.  Information technology governance by design: investigating hybrid configurations and integration mechanisms , 2000, ICIS.

[19]  P. Reason,et al.  Human inquiry : a sourcebook of new paradigm research , 1983 .

[20]  John M. Ward,et al.  Unlocking Sustained Business Value from IT Investments: Balancing Problem-Based and Innovation- Based Implementations , 2005 .

[21]  Joey F. George,et al.  Examining the computing and centralization debate , 1991, CACM.

[22]  Philip Powell,et al.  Managing the IS function During Mergers , 2001, ECIS.

[23]  Chris W. Clegg,et al.  Information technology: a study of performance and the role of human and organizational factors , 1997 .

[24]  J. Heron.  Co-Operative Inquiry: Research into the Human Condition , 1996 .

[25]  R. Cyert,et al.  Theory of the Firm , 1966 .

[26]  Henryk Skolimowski,et al.  The Participatory Mind: A New Theory of Knowledge and of the Universe , 1995 .

[27]  P. Reason.  Reflections on Sacred Experience and Sacred Science , 1993 .

[28]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  THEORY OF THE FIRM: MANAGERIAL BEHAVIOR, AGENCY COSTS AND OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE , 1976 .

[29]  John Leslie King,et al.  Centralized versus decentralized computing: organizational considerations and management options , 1983, CSUR.

[30]  P. Weill,et al.  Don't Just Lead, Govern: Implementing Effective it Governance , 2002 .

[31]  Vallabh Sambamurthy,et al.  Principles and Models for Organizing the IT Function , 2002, MIS Q. Executive.

[32]  Joe Peppard,et al.  Useful knowledge for information systems practice: the contribution of the participatory paradigm , 2003, J. Inf. Technol..

[33]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  THEORY OF THE FIRM: MANAGERIAL BEHAVIOR, AGENCY COSTS AND OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE , 1976 .

[34]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  An extended platform logic perspective of IT governance: managing perceptions and activities of IT , 2003, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[35]  E. Robinson.  Cybernetics, or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine , 1963 .

[36]  L. Diamond.  IT Governance : How Top Performers Manage IT Decision Rights for Superior Results , 2005 .