Performance of Bridges during the 2010 Darfield and 2011 Christchurch Earthquakes

The region in and around Christchurch, encompassing Christchurch city and the Selwyn and Waimakariri districts, contains more than 800 road, rail, and pedestrian bridges. Most of these bridges are reinforced concrete, symmetric, and have small to moderate spans (15–25 m). The 22 February 2011 moment magnitude ( Mw ) 6.2 Christchurch earthquake induced high levels of localized ground shaking (Bradley and Cubrinovski 2011, page 853 of this issue; Guidotti et al. 2011, page 767 of this issue; Smyrou et al. 2011, page 882 of this issue), with damage to bridges mainly confined to the central and eastern parts of Christchurch. Liquefaction was evident over much of this part of the city, with lateral spreading affecting bridges spanning both the Avon and Heathcote rivers. The majority of bridge damage was a result of liquefaction-induced lateral spreading, with only four bridges suffering significant damage on non-liquefiable sites. Abutments, approaches, and piers suffered varying levels of damage, with very little damage observed in the bridge superstructure. However, bridges suffered only a moderate amount of damage compared to other structural systems. Because some bridges critical to the city infrastructure network sustained substantial damage, extensive traffic disruption occurred immediately following the event. This paper presents a summary of field observations and subsequent analyses on the damage to some of the bridges in the Canterbury region as a result of the Christchurch earthquake. Reference is also made to the performance of bridges following the 4 September 2010 Mw 7.1 Darfield earthquake (Gledhill et al. 2011), and details of damage progression are presented where applicable. The ground motion characteristics for both events and the regional soil conditions are first described. We provide descriptions of the damage at each selected bridge site and compare observations of liquefaction with predicted response using in situ test data. …

[1]  B. R. Paterson,et al.  Geology of Christchurch, New Zealand , 1995 .

[2]  Brendon A. Bradley,et al.  Probabilistic seismic performance and loss assessment of a bridge-foundation-soil system , 2010 .

[3]  W. F. Marcuson,et al.  Liquefaction Resistance of Soils: Summary Report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF Workshops on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils , 2001 .

[4]  Eric J. Fielding,et al.  Fault Location and Slip Distribution of the 22 February 2011 Mw 6.2 Christchurch, New Zealand, Earthquake from Geodetic Data , 2011 .

[5]  B. Bradley,et al.  Use of DCP and SASW Tests to Evaluate Liquefaction Potential: Predictions vs. Observations during the Recent New Zealand Earthquakes , 2011 .

[6]  Michel Bruneau,et al.  Preliminary findings on performance of bridges in the 2010 Darfield earthquake , 2010 .

[7]  Misko Cubrinovski,et al.  Geotechnical reconnaissance of the 2010 Darfield (Canterbury) earthquake , 2010 .

[8]  K. Stokoe,et al.  Liquefaction resistance of soils from shear-wave velocity , 2000 .

[9]  L. Megget,et al.  Bulletin of the New Zealand society for earthquake engineering , 2002 .

[10]  Misko Cubrinovski,et al.  PSEUDO-STATIC ANALYSIS OF PILES IN LIQUEFIABLE SOILS: PARAMETRIC EVALUATION OF LIQUEFIED LAYER PROPERTIES , 2008 .

[11]  Katsuichiro Goda,et al.  Estimation of Seismic Loss for Spatially Distributed Buildings , 2008 .

[12]  Donald E. Yule,et al.  The influence of confining stress on liquefaction resistance , 1998 .

[13]  Roberto Paolucci,et al.  Numerical Study on the Role of Basin Geometry and Kinematic Seismic Source in 3D Ground Motion Simulation of the 22 February 2011 Mw 6.2 Christchurch Earthquake , 2011 .

[14]  Brendon A. Bradley,et al.  NZ-specific pseudo-spectral acceleration ground motion prediction equations based on foreign models , 2010 .

[15]  Caroline Holden,et al.  The Darfield (Canterbury, New Zealand) Mw 7.1 Earthquake of September 2010: A Preliminary Seismological Report , 2011 .

[16]  Brendon A. Bradley,et al.  Near-source Strong Ground Motions Observed in the 22 February 2011 Christchurch Earthquake , 2011 .

[17]  Misko Cubrinovski,et al.  EFFECTIVE STRESS ANALYSIS OF PILES IN LIQUEFIABLE SOIL: A CASE STUDY OF A BRIDGE FOUNDATION , 2008 .

[18]  Ihsan Engin Bal,et al.  Ground Motions versus Geotechnical and Structural Damage in the February 2011 Christchurch Earthquake , 2011 .