Preservice Teachers and Technology Integration: Rethinking Traditional Roles

Although the use of learning technology has become increasingly prominent in schools, significant changes in teaching strategies have not kept pace. Lack of quality professional development and inadequate teacher preparation are often cited for this situation. This case study explores the use of the student teaching experience as an avenue for both preservice and inservice teachers’ professional development associated with educational technology. Two main questions are explored: First, to what extent can preservice teachers enact a technology-rich curriculum unit during their field experience; second, to what extent and under what conditions can the preservice teachers facilitate their cooperating mentor teachers’ acquisition of these same skills. Results indicate preservice teachers can stimulate the integration of technology-rich innovations in their mentor teachers.

[1]  Virginia Richardson‐Koehler Barriers to the Effective Supervision of Student Teaching: A Field Study , 1988 .

[2]  Stephanie Hirsh,et al.  A National Plan for Improving Professional Development. , 2000 .

[3]  Timothy Koschmann,et al.  Cscl : Theory and Practice of An Emerging Paradigm , 1996 .

[4]  Barbara A. Crawford,et al.  Is It Realistic to Expect a Preservice Teacher to Create an Inquiry-based Classroom? , 1999 .

[5]  R. Marx,et al.  Teacher Knowledge of Educational Technology: A Case Study of Student/Mentor Teacher Pairs , 2002 .

[6]  Ida,et al.  Teacher Learning: New Policies, New Practices , 1996 .

[7]  Linda Darling-Hammond,et al.  Policies That Support Professional Development in an Era of Reform , 2011 .

[8]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  International handbook of science education , 1998 .

[9]  Andee Rubin,et al.  Video laboratories: tools for scientific investigation , 1993, CACM.

[10]  Edith S. Tatel Improving Classroom Practice: Ways Experienced Teachers Change after Supervising Student Teachers. , 1994 .

[11]  Louis M. Gomez,et al.  High-end high school communication: tool use practices of students in a networked environment , 1996 .

[12]  J. Lagowski National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[13]  Laura M. Desimone,et al.  What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results From a National Sample of Teachers , 2001 .

[14]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Performance of Students in Project-Based Science Classrooms on a National Measure of Science Achievement. , 2002 .

[15]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Science on the Web: Students Online in a Sixth-Grade Classroom , 2000 .

[16]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  A Middle Grade Science Teacher's Emerging Understanding of Project-Based Instruction , 1994, The Elementary School Journal.

[17]  Soner Yıldırım Effects of an Educational Computing Course on Preservice and Inservice Teachers , 2000 .

[18]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  Key to the information highway , 1996, CACM.

[19]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Computer Support for Knowledge-Building Communities , 1994 .

[20]  Merrie L. Blunk,et al.  Enacting Project-Based Science: Experiences of Four Middle Grade Teachers , 1994, The Elementary School Journal.

[21]  Chris Dede,et al.  Model-Based Teaching and Learning with BioLogica™: What Do They Learn? How Do They Learn? How Do We Know? , 2004 .

[22]  L. Giddings Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 2d ed , 2005 .

[23]  J. Shea National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[24]  Jonathan A. Supovitz,et al.  The Effects of Professional Development on Science Teaching Practices and Classroom Culture , 2000 .

[25]  R. Hake Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses , 1998 .

[26]  Patricia E. Simmons,et al.  Beginning teachers : Beliefs and classroom actions , 1999 .

[27]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  Distributed collaborative science learning using scientific visualization and wideband telecommunications , 1997 .

[28]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Improving teaching and learning in science and mathematics , 1996 .

[29]  Kenneth J. Schoon,et al.  The Seamless Field Experience Model for Secondary Science Teacher Preparation , 1997 .

[30]  Gillian H. Roehrig,et al.  Growing a Garden without Water: Graduate Teaching Assistants in Introductory Science Laboratories at a Doctoral/Research University , 2004 .

[31]  William C. Kyle,et al.  The effects of new science curricula on student performance , 1983 .

[32]  Brian Alters,et al.  PERSPECTIVE: TEACHING EVOLUTION IN HIGHER EDUCATION , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[33]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[34]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Making Dynamic Modeling Accessible to Precollege Science Students , 1994, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[35]  Joan E. Hughes,et al.  Preservice Teachers , 2003 .

[36]  Stanley B. Straw,et al.  The effect of talk and writing on learning science: An exploratory study , 2000 .

[37]  N. Pelaez,et al.  Problem-based writing with peer review improves academic performance in physiology. , 2002, Advances in physiology education.

[38]  Marilyn Cochran-Smith Reinventing Student Teaching , 1991 .

[39]  M. Brumby,et al.  Misconceptions about the concept of natural selection by medical biology students , 1984 .

[40]  C. Mouza Learning to Teach with New Technology , 2002 .

[41]  Ulrike W Tschirner,et al.  Student Peer Teaching: An Innovative Approach to Instruction in Science and Engineering Education , 2001 .

[42]  M. Alexander,et al.  Professional development. , 1999, Journal of intravenous nursing : the official publication of the Intravenous Nurses Society.

[43]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  Addressing the Challenges of Inquiry-Based Learning Through Technology and Curriculum Design , 1999 .

[44]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  An effective metacognitive strategy: learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based Cognitive Tutor , 2002, Cogn. Sci..

[45]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  Qualitative research and case study applications in education , 1998 .