Electrode alignment of transverse tripoles using a percutaneous triple-lead approach in spinal cord stimulation

The aim of this modeling study is to determine the influence of electrode alignment of transverse tripoles on the paresthesia coverage of the pain area in spinal cord stimulation, using a percutaneous triple-lead approach. Transverse tripoles, comprising a central cathode and two lateral anodes, were modeled on the low-thoracic vertebral region (T10-T12) using percutaneous triple-lead configurations, with the center lead on the spinal cord midline. The triple leads were oriented both aligned and staggered. In the staggered configuration, the anodes were offset either caudally (caudally staggered) or rostrally (rostrally staggered) with respect to the midline cathode. The transverse tripolar field steering with the aligned and staggered configurations enabled the estimation of dorsal column fiber thresholds (I(DC)) and dorsal root fiber thresholds (I(DR)) at various anodal current ratios. I(DC) and I(DR) were considerably higher for the aligned transverse tripoles as compared to the staggered transverse tripoles. The aligned transverse tripoles facilitated deeper penetration into the medial dorsal columns (DCs). The staggered transverse tripoles always enabled broad and bilateral DC activation, at the expense of mediolateral steerability. The largest DC recruited area was obtained with the rostrally staggered transverse tripole. Transverse tripolar geometries, using percutaneous leads, allow for selective targeting of either medial or lateral DC fibers, if and only if the transverse tripole is aligned. Steering of anodal currents between the lateral leads of the staggered transverse tripoles cannot target medially confined populations of DC fibers in the spinal cord. An aligned transverse tripolar configuration is strongly recommended, because of its ability to provide more post-operative flexibility than other configurations.

[1]  J. Holsheimer,et al.  Excitation of dorsal root fibers in spinal cord stimulation: a theoretical study , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  R Hoekema,et al.  Theoretical performance and clinical evaluation of transverse tripolar spinal cord stimulation. , 1998, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[3]  J. Holsheimer,et al.  Optimum electrode geometry for spinal cord stimulation: The narrow bipole and tripole , 1997, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[4]  J. Holsheimer Effectiveness of Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Management of Chronic Pain: Analysis of Technical Drawbacks and Solutions , 1997 .

[5]  G. Barolat Spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain management. , 2000, Archives of medical research.

[6]  W A Wesselink,et al.  Clinical evaluation of paresthesia steering with a new system for spinal cord stimulation. , 1998, Neurosurgery.

[7]  Nathan A. Torgerson,et al.  Quantitative Aspects of the Clinical Performance of Transverse Tripolar Spinal Cord Stimulation , 1999, Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society.

[8]  J. Holsheimer,et al.  Recruitment of dorsal column fibers in spinal cord stimulation: influence of collateral branching , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  J. Sieracki,et al.  Spinal Cord Stimulation Electrode Design: Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Percutaneous and Laminectomy Electrodes—Part I: Technical Outcomes , 2002, Neurosurgery.

[10]  G. Barolat,et al.  Multifactorial analysis of epidural spinal cord stimulation. , 1991, Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery.

[11]  J. Holsheimer,et al.  Transverse Tripolar Spinal Cord Stimulation: Results of an International Multicenter Study , 2006, Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society.

[12]  N. Klug,et al.  Augmentative Treatment of Chronic Deafferentation Pain Syndromes after Peripheral Nerve Lesions , 2000, Minimally invasive neurosurgery : MIN.

[13]  J. Holsheimer,et al.  A model of the electrical behaviour of myelinated sensory nerve fibres based on human data , 1999, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[14]  Jiping He,et al.  Stimulation Usage Range for Chronic Pain Management , 1994 .

[15]  A. Buvanendran,et al.  Efficacy of transverse tripolar spinal cord stimulator for the relief of chronic low back pain from failed back surgery. , 2008, Pain physician.

[16]  K. Bulsara,et al.  Laminectomy versus percutaneous electrode placement for spinal cord stimulation. , 2000, Neurosurgery.

[17]  R. North,et al.  Spinal cord stimulation for chronic, intractable pain. , 1995 .

[18]  Steven Piantadosi,et al.  Spinal cord stimulation for chronic, intractable pain: Superiority of “multi-channel” devices , 1991, Pain.

[19]  Jan Holsheimer,et al.  Which Neuronal Elements are Activated Directly by Spinal Cord Stimulation , 2002, Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society.

[20]  M. Carpenter,et al.  The Essentials of Neuroanatomy , 1978 .

[21]  Jiping He,et al.  Mapping of sensory responses to epidural stimulation of the intraspinal neural structures in man. , 1993, Journal of neurosurgery.

[22]  J. Struijk,et al.  Transverse tripolar spinal cord stimulation: Theoretical performance of a dual channel system , 1996, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[23]  Ljubomir Manola,et al.  Technical Performance of Percutaneous and Laminectomy Leads Analyzed by Modeling , 2004, Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society.

[25]  Ljubomir Manola,et al.  Theoretical Investigation Into Longitudinal Cathodal Field Steering in Spinal Cord Stimulation , 2007, Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society.