The prioritization and categorization method (PCM) process evaluation at Ericsson: a case study

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate and evaluate the prioritization and categorization method (PCM), which facilitates the active participation of process stakeholders (managers, owners, customers) in process assessments. Stakeholders evaluate processes in terms of effectiveness, efficiency and relevance against certain contextual business and industry factors. This collective evaluation serves as a foundation for the management decision-making process regarding process improvement and redesign. Design/methodology/approach: The PCM is examined based on a case study at Ericsson. In total, 55 stakeholders, representing different organizational levels and functions, assessed eight core processes. Follow-up interviews and feedback after the evaluation sessions were collected for triangulation purpose. Findings: The PCM helps Ericsson evaluate its processes within business context and industry environments. The results show that, to realize seamless end-to-end processes in the eight assessed processes, Ericsson has to make a greater effort to improve its process structures, governance and culture for fulfilling the needs of future business. Ericsson Steering Group is satisfied with the insights provided and has decided to train more stakeholders to use PCM. Research limitations/implications: This research is based on a single case within a specific organizational setting. The results may not be necessary generalizable to other business and industry settings. Organizations need to configure PCM in consideration of their own processes and business contingencies to explore and fulfil their process improvement purposes. Originality/value: This paper presents a new context-aware, easy-to-use and holistic method for business process management (BPM), the PCM. The method requires the active engagement of stakeholders, it focusses on developing dynamic BPM capabilities and fully embeds organizational contingencies and contextual factors in the decision-making regarding BPM. This paper contributes a novel method to explorative BPM.

[1]  Jörg Becker,et al.  Maturity models in business process management , 2012, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[2]  Rainer Sommer,et al.  Comparison and evaluation of business process modelling and management tools , 2007, Int. J. Serv. Stand..

[3]  Patricia Malone,et al.  Mastering the Unpredictable: How Adaptive Case Management Will Revolutionize the Way That Knowledge Workers Get Things Done , 2011 .

[4]  Bing Yu,et al.  Software tools supporting business process analysis and modelling , 1997, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[5]  Remco M. Dijkman,et al.  Properties that influence business process management maturity and its effect on organizational performance , 2016, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[6]  Bill Curtis,et al.  Process modeling , 1992, CACM.

[7]  H. Harrington.  Business process improvement : the breakthrough strategy for total quality, productivity, and competitiveness , 1991 .

[8]  Wasana Bandara,et al.  Prioritizing Process Improvement: An Example from the Australian Financial Services Sector , 2015, Handbook on Business Process Management.

[9]  Jan vom Brocke,et al.  On the role of context in business process management , 2016, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[10]  Gregor Zellner,et al.  A structured evaluation of business process improvement approaches , 2011, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[11]  M. Hammer.  The process audit. , 2007, Harvard business review.

[12]  Paul Johannesson,et al.  Prioritizing Business Processes Improvement Initiatives: The Seco Tools Case , 2014, CAiSE.

[13]  Edward F. Watson,et al.  Business Process Automation , 2009, Handbook of Automation.

[14]  Harry Bouwman,et al.  European Conference on Information Systems ( ECIS ) 1-1-2004 Business Architecture : A New Paradigm to Relate eBusiness Strategy to ICT , 2013 .

[15]  Robert MacIntosh,et al.  Planning reconsidered: Paradox, poetry and people at the edge of strategy , 2015 .

[16]  Narayan Ramasubbu,et al.  How Information Management Capability Influences Firm Performance , 2011, MIS Q..

[17]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  The Six Core Elements of Business Process Management , 2015, Handbook on Business Process Management.

[18]  William J. Kettinger,et al.  Business Process Change: A Study of Methodologies, Techniques, and Tools , 1997, MIS Q..

[19]  Eva-Maria Kern,et al.  Surveys in business process management - a literature review , 2015, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[20]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Process Innovation: Reengineering Work Through Information Technology , 1992 .

[21]  Henk Jonkers,et al.  The Architecture of the ArchiMate Language , 2009, BMMDS/EMMSAD.

[22]  Tom Chippendale.  About the company , 2015 .

[23]  Øystein D. Fjeldstad,et al.  CONFIGURING VALUE FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: ON CHAINS, SHOPS, AND NETWORKS , 1998 .

[24]  Jan Recker,et al.  Teaching Business Process Modelling: Experiences and Recommendations , 2009, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Birger Andersson,et al.  Aligning goals and services through goal and business modelling , 2009, Inf. Syst. E Bus. Manag..

[26]  A. Sohal,et al.  Business Process Reengineering A review of recent literature , 1999 .

[27]  Fu-Ren Lin,et al.  A generic structure for business process modeling , 2002, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[28]  Mutaz M. Al-Debei,et al.  Developing a unified framework of the business model concept , 2010, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[29]  O. A. Sawy,et al.  Digital business strategy: toward a next generation of insights , 2013 .

[30]  Jan Recker,et al.  Ten principles of good business process management , 2014, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[31]  Jens Poeppelbuss,et al.  New frontiers in business process management (BPM) , 2014 .

[32]  Henry Mintzberg.  Musings on management. Ten ideas designed to rile everyone who cares about management. , 1996, Harvard business review.

[33]  David E. Avison,et al.  The potential of hermeneutics in information systems research , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[34]  David T. Wilson,et al.  The Future of Competition , 2001 .

[35]  Keith D. Swenson,et al.  Mastering the Unpredictable: How Adaptive Case Management Will Revolutionize the Way That Knowledge Workers Get Things Done , 2010 .

[36]  Hajo A. Reijers,et al.  Business process maturity models: a systematic literature review , 2016 .

[37]  Kyösti Pennanen,et al.  The value space: how firms facilitate value creation , 2016, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[38]  William J. Kettinger.  Business Process Change: A Study of , 2016 .

[39]  Leonardo Ensslin,et al.  Research Opportunities in Business Process Management and Performance Measurement from a Constructivist View , 2016 .

[40]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[41]  Peter Trkman,et al.  International Journal of Information Management , 2022 .

[42]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[43]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[44]  Barrie G. Dale,et al.  Business process management: a review and evaluation , 1998, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[45]  W.M.P. van der Aalst,et al.  Business Process Management: A Comprehensive Survey , 2013 .

[46]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  Proposals for Future BPM Research Directions , 2014, AP-BPM.

[47]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  Business Process Management , 2016, Business & Information Systems Engineering.

[48]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  Towards a Business Process Management Maturity Model , 2005, ECIS.

[49]  Frederik D. Wiersema,et al.  The Discipline of Market Leaders , 1995 .

[50]  Jan Recker,et al.  Which cultural values matter to business process management?: Results from a global Delphi study , 2013, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[51]  Michael Hammer,et al.  Reengineering Work: Don’t Automate, Obliterate , 1990 .

[52]  Björn Niehaves,et al.  BPM capability development - a matter of contingencies , 2014, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[53]  Jason Bennett Thatcher,et al.  Looking Toward the Future of IT-Business Strategic Alignment through the Past: A Meta-Analysis , 2014, MIS Q..

[54]  Roger T. Burlton.  Delivering Business Strategy Through Process Management , 2015, Handbook on Business Process Management.

[55]  Paul Johannesson,et al.  Developing a Method for Prioritizing Business Process Improvement Initiatives , 2014, PACIS.

[56]  Dax D. Jacobson,et al.  Business Process Governance , 2010 .

[57]  F. Caeldries.  Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution , 1994 .

[58]  Shahid A. Zia,et al.  Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries & Competitors , 2013 .

[59]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Interfirm IT Capability Profiles and Communications for Cocreating Relational Value: Evidence from the Logistics Industry , 2012, MIS Q..

[60]  Nathalie. Tocci.  What Is a Strategy , 2017 .

[61]  George M. Giaglis,et al.  A Taxonomy of Business Process Modeling and Information Systems Modeling Techniques , 2001 .

[62]  Mathias Weske,et al.  Business Process Management: A Survey , 2003, Business Process Management.

[63]  M. Hammer,et al.  REENGINEERING THE CORPORATION: A MANIFESTO FOR BUSINESS REVOLUTION , 1995 .

[64]  Maximilian Röglinger,et al.  Interview with Michael Rosemann on ambidextrous business process management , 2014, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[65]  Craig Huxley,et al.  An improved method to identify critical processes , 2003 .

[66]  Sam Solaimani,et al.  A framework for the alignment of business model and business processes: A generic model for trans-sector innovation , 2012, Bus. Process. Manag. J..