Structural Features of the mdg1 Lineage of the Ty3/gypsy Group of LTR Retrotransposons Inferred from the Phylogenetic Analyses of Its Open Reading Frames

Abstract. The increasing amount of data generated in recent years has opened the way to exhaustive studies of the relationships among different members of the Ty3/gypsy group of LTR retrotransposons, a widespread group of eukaryotic transposable elements. Former research led to the identification of several independent lineages within this group. One of the worse represented of them is that of mdg1, integrated so far only by the Drosophila retrotransposons mdg1 and 412. Our exhaustive database searches indicate the existence of three other Drosophila members of this lineage. Two of them correspond to elements already known, namely, Stalker and blood, but the third one is a new element, which we have called Pilgrim. This element is well represented within the D. melanogaster genome, as revealed by our Southern blot analysis of different strains. The case of Stalker is particularly remarkable, since its phylogenetic relationships clearly point to the mosaic origin of its genome. Finally, our analysis of the evolution of a small ORF preserved within the 5′ leader region of these elements indicates different evolutionary rates, presumably as a result of distinct selective constraints.

[1]  K. Saigo,et al.  Complete nucleotide sequence and genome organization of a Drosophila transposable genetic element, 297. , 1986, European journal of biochemistry.

[2]  Thomas L. Madden,et al.  BLAST 2 Sequences, a new tool for comparing protein and nucleotide sequences. , 1999, FEMS microbiology letters.

[3]  Avedisov Sn,et al.  [Features of the structural organization of the MDG1 retrotransposon of Drosophila, revealed during its sequencing]. , 1990 .

[4]  Roderic D. M. Page,et al.  TreeView: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers , 1996, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[5]  Z. Yang,et al.  Estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution rates under realistic evolutionary models. , 2000, Molecular biology and evolution.

[6]  J. McDonald,et al.  Evolution and consequences of transposable elements. , 1993, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[7]  E. Southern.  Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis. , 1975, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  K. Saigo,et al.  Nucleotide sequence characterization of a Drosophila retrotransposon, 412. , 1986, European journal of biochemistry.

[9]  Claude Bazin,et al.  Dynamics and evolution of trans-posable elements , 1996 .

[10]  Ziheng Yang,et al.  Phylogenetic Analysis by Maximum Likelihood (PAML) , 2002 .

[11]  Y. Ilyin,et al.  Leader region of mdg1 Drosophila retrotransposon RNA contains 3'-end processing sites. , 1991, Nucleic acids research.

[12]  N. Bowen,et al.  Genomic analysis of Caenorhabditis elegans reveals ancient families of retroviral-like elements. , 1999, Genome research.

[13]  Michael Tristem,et al.  Identification of Multiple Gypsy LTR-Retrotransposon Lineages in Vertebrate Genomes , 1999, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[14]  I. K. Jordan,et al.  Evidence for the Role of Recombination in the Regulatory Evolution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ty Elements , 1998, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[15]  Hugh B. Nicholas,et al.  GeneDoc: a tool for editing and annotating multiple sequence alignments , 1997 .

[16]  O. Simonova,et al.  A novel transposition system in Drosophila melanogaster depending on the Stalker mobile genetic element. , 1990, The EMBO journal.

[17]  E. Myers,et al.  Basic local alignment search tool. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  J. Costas,et al.  Amplification and Phylogenetic Relationships of a Subfamily of blood, a Retrotransposable Element of Drosophila , 2001, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[19]  B. Cullen,et al.  An ancient family of human endogenous retroviruses encodes a functional homolog of the HIV-1 Rev protein. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  T. Eickbush,et al.  Origin and evolution of retroelements based upon their reverse transcriptase sequences. , 1990, The EMBO journal.

[21]  Wei Qian,et al.  Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. , 2000, Molecular biology and evolution.

[22]  S. Parkhurst,et al.  Developmental expression of Drosophila melanogaster retrovirus‐like transposable elements. , 1987, The EMBO journal.

[23]  M. Nei,et al.  Simple methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions. , 1986, Molecular biology and evolution.

[24]  J. Costas,et al.  Evolutionary history of the human endogenous retrovirus family ERV9. , 2000, Molecular biology and evolution.

[25]  J. Thompson,et al.  The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[26]  T. Eickbush,et al.  Modular Evolution of the Integrase Domain in the Ty3/Gypsy Class of LTR Retrotransposons , 1999, Journal of Virology.

[27]  N. Saitou,et al.  The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. , 1987, Molecular biology and evolution.

[28]  C. Lloréns,et al.  Ty3/Gypsy retrotransposons: description of new Arabidopsis thaliana elements and evolutionary perspectives derived from comparative genomic data. , 2000, Molecular biology and evolution.