Educational Complexity: Centrality of Design and Monitoring of the Experience

In the first part of the paper we discuss why the characteristics of the "organic" era of interaction, we are living, make us claim the centrality of the "Design" as an element of possible innovation for the whole educational scene of this new century and more so for educational processes that have strong relationships with design domains and practices (HCI, I×D, Design for experience, TEL, etc.). The dissemination and the acquisition of the "design literacy" require, however, the adoption of complex educational processes, like the "organic process", that, in turn, requires the development of an equally complex monitoring system, able to assist teachers/tutors in the evaluation of qualities of the educational Experience and individual Experience styles, to customize, contextualize and, more in general, improve the experiences. In the second part of the paper, thus, we present, as a first step toward the realization of such monitoring system, the development of tools and methodologies that allow to monitor in quasi-real time the social level of the interaction and the quality of the social emotions, i.e. individuals' emotional feelings and emotional nuances of their relationships.

[1]  Vladimir Pavlovic,et al.  Real-Time Vision for Human-Computer Interaction , 2010 .

[2]  F. Cambi Manuale di storia della pedagogia , 2003 .

[3]  Reinhard Pekrun,et al.  Progress and open problems in educational emotion research , 2005 .

[4]  Carlo Giovannella,et al.  Monitoring Learning Experiences and Styles: The Socio-emotional Level , 2010, 2010 10th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.

[5]  Bill Moggridge,et al.  Designing interactions , 2006 .

[6]  Mark Weiser,et al.  Some computer science issues in ubiquitous computing , 1993, CACM.

[7]  Mark Weiser,et al.  Some Computer Science Problems in Ubiquitous Computing , 1993 .

[8]  Carlo Strapparava,et al.  The Affective Weight of Lexicon , 2006, LREC.

[9]  Adam Greenfield,et al.  Everyware: The Dawning Age of Ubiquitous Computing , 2006 .

[10]  Kinshuk,et al.  In-Depth Analysis of the Felder-Silverman Learning Style Dimensions , 2007 .

[11]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[12]  John Thackara,et al.  In the Bubble: Designing in a Complex World , 2005 .

[13]  Carlo Giovannella,et al.  Challenging Technologies, Rethinking Pedagogy, Being Design-Inspired: The Grand Challenge of this Century , 2010, ELERN.

[14]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Affective Learning — A Manifesto , 2004 .

[15]  P. Ekman An argument for basic emotions , 1992 .

[16]  Carlo Giovannella,et al.  From Learning Styles to Experience Styles , 2010, 2010 10th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.

[17]  R. Plutchik Emotion, a psychoevolutionary synthesis , 1980 .

[18]  William Lidwell,et al.  Universal Principles of Design , 2003 .

[19]  D. Schoen The Reflective Practitioner , 1983 .

[20]  J. Löwgren Articulating the use qualities of digital designs , 2006 .

[21]  K. Ecclestone,et al.  Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning , 2004 .

[22]  U. Eco The Open Work , 1989 .

[23]  K. Scherer What are emotions? And how can they be measured? , 2005 .

[24]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994 .