Hybrid polygon and hydrodynamic nebula modeling with multi-waveband radiation transfer in astrophysics

We demonstrate the potential for research and outreach of mixed polygon and hydrodynamic modeling and multi-waveband rendering in the interactive 3-D astrophysical virtual laboratory Shape. In 3-D special effects and animation software for the mass media, computer graphics techniques that mix polygon and numerical hydrodynamics have become common place. In astrophysics, however, interactive modeling with polygon structures has only become available with the software Shape. Numerical hydrodynamic simulations and their visualization are usually separate, while in Shape it is integrated with the polygon modeling approach that requires no programming by the user. With two generic examples, we demonstrate that research and outreach modeling can be achieved with techniques similar to those used in the media industry with the added capability for physical rendering at any wavelength band, yielding more realistic radiation modeling. Furthermore, we show how the hydrodynamics and the polygon mesh modeling can be mixed to achieve results that are superior to those obtained using either one of these modeling techniques alone.

[1]  W. Steffen,et al.  POST ASYMPTOTIC GIANT BRANCH BIPOLAR REFLECTION NEBULAE: RESULT OF DYNAMICAL EJECTION OR SELECTIVE ILLUMINATION? , 2013 .

[2]  S. Imboden,et al.  Splotch: visualizing cosmological simulations , 2008, 0807.1742.

[3]  K. Nordsieck,et al.  The Size distribution of interstellar grains , 1977 .

[4]  Marcus A. Magnor,et al.  Shape: A 3D Modeling Tool for Astrophysics , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[5]  Cosmology,et al.  Morpho-kinematical modelling of Nova Eridani 2009 (KT Eri) , 2013, 1305.3834.

[6]  Bernard Pailthorpe,et al.  Visualizing Stars and Emission Nebulas , 2001, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[7]  J. L. Bourlot,et al.  The global dust SED: tracing the nature and evolution of dust with DustEM , 2010, 1010.2769.

[8]  W. Kapferer,et al.  Visualization needs and techniques for astrophysical simulations , 2008 .

[9]  D. Leahy,et al.  Quark nova imprint in the extreme supernova explosion SN 2006gy: the advent of the Quark Star , 2010, 1010.5530.

[10]  M. Magnor,et al.  A wind–shell interaction model for multipolar planetary nebulae , 2013, 1308.4372.

[11]  M. Richer,et al.  MORPHO-KINEMATIC ANALYSIS OF THE POINT-SYMMETRIC, BIPOLAR PLANETARY NEBULAE Hb 5 AND K 3-17, A PATHWAY TO POLY-POLARITY , 2012, 1203.3394.

[12]  Rickard Edén jMonkeyEngine 3.0 Cookbook , 2014 .

[13]  Peter R. Young,et al.  CHIANTI - an atomic database for emission lines. IX. Ionization rates, recombination rates, ionization equilibria for the elements hydrogen through zinc and updated atomic data , 2009 .

[14]  Christopher J. Fluke,et al.  Scientific Visualization in Astronomy: Towards the Petascale Astronomy Era , 2011, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia.

[15]  M. Richer,et al.  A DETAILED MORPHO-KINEMATIC MODEL OF THE ESKIMO, NGC 2392: A UNIFYING VIEW WITH THE CAT'S EYE AND SATURN PLANETARY NEBULAE , 2012, 1211.6717.

[16]  R. Humphreys,et al.  Dissecting a supernova impostor’s circumstellar medium: MUSEing about the SHAPE of η Carinae’s outer ejecta , 2016, 1610.01688.