Lack of Gender Bias in Citation Rates of Publications by Dendrochronologists: What is Unique about this Discipline?

Abstract Most academic disciplines have a gender bias that exists in the recognition of research publications: women's publications are cited at lower rates than men's publications. In this paper, we examined whether a similar gender bias existed for publications by dendrochronologists. Tree-ring research is a fairly small field where males outnumber females, and therefore the sample size was limited to 20 female dendrochronologists and 20 male dendrochronologists. It was determined that native language (English or non-native English speaker), current employment (government or academic), and gender of the first-author do not significantly influence a paper's probability of being cited. However, years since dissertation completion was a good predictor of a paper's citation rate. We suggest that the high productivity of female dendrochronologists and a pattern of co-authoring with male colleagues bring the work of females to the attention of their male colleagues and thus eliminate the gender bias in citation of women's work common to other disciplines.

[1]  Duane P. Truex,et al.  Assessing Scholarly Influence: Using the Hirsch Indices to Reframe the Discourse , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Jon R. Sorensen,et al.  Gender differences in research productivity among criminal justice and criminology scholars , 2009 .

[3]  Hariolf Grupp,et al.  Gender-specific patterns in patenting and publishing , 2009 .

[4]  Richard S. J. Tol,et al.  The Matthew effect defined and tested for the 100 most prolific economists , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[5]  Lionel Standing.  Public recognition of major works in psychology: Rise and fall over time , 2009 .

[6]  Xian-Jin Xie,et al.  A gender gap in the dermatology literature? Cross-sectional analysis of manuscript authorship trends in dermatology journals during 3 decades. , 2009, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[7]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  The contribution of star scientists to overall sex differences in research productivity , 2009, Scientometrics.

[8]  Perspectives on botanical research publications in South Africa : an assessment of five local journals from 1988 to 2002, a period of transition and transformation , 2008 .

[9]  P. Cherubini.  Impact Factor Fever , 2008, Science.

[10]  Nicky Dries,et al.  Career success: Constructing a multidimensional model , 2008 .

[11]  T. Zimmers,et al.  Scientific impact of women in academic surgery. , 2008, The Journal of surgical research.

[12]  M. Heilman,et al.  Motherhood: a potential source of bias in employment decisions. , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[13]  Rafael Aleixandre-Benavent,et al.  Valoración de la paridad en la autoría de los artículos publicados en la Revista Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica durante el quinquenio 2001-2005 , 2007 .

[14]  Rafael Aleixandre-Benavent,et al.  [Gender analysis among articles published in Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica (2001-2005)]. , 2007, Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica.

[15]  T. Schmader,et al.  A Linguistic Comparison of Letters of Recommendation for Male and Female Chemistry and Biochemistry Job Applicants , 2007, Sex roles.

[16]  Anne Boschini,et al.  Is Team Formation Gender Neutral? Evidence from Coauthorship Patterns , 2007, Journal of Labor Economics.

[17]  L. Bornmann,et al.  Gender differences in grant peer review: A meta-analysis , 2007, J. Informetrics.

[18]  Neil J. Gemmell,et al.  Gender Differences in Publication Output: Towards an Unbiased Metric of Research Performance , 2006, PloS one.

[19]  E. Dorsey,et al.  Predictors of future publication record and academic rank in a cohort of neurology residents , 2006, Neurology.

[20]  Peter Willett,et al.  Brief communication: Gender differences in publication and citation counts in librarianship and information science research , 2006, J. Inf. Sci..

[21]  J. McDowell,et al.  Two to Tango? Gender Differences in the Decisions to Publish and Coauthor , 2006 .

[22]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  Criteria Used by a Peer Review Committee for Selection of Research Fellows: A Boolean Probit Analysis , 2005 .

[23]  Malin Håkanson,et al.  The Impact of Gender on Citations: An Analysis of College & Research Libraries, Journal of Academic Librarianship, and Library Quarterly , 2005 .

[24]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  Selection of research fellowship recipients by committee peer review. Reliability, fairness and predictive validity of Board of Trustees' decisions , 2005, Scientometrics.

[25]  C. Lafon.  Reconstructing Fire History: An Exercise in Dendrochronology , 2005 .

[26]  I. Levin,et al.  Separating gender biases in screening and selecting candidates for hiring and firing , 2005 .

[27]  Cheryl Caswell,et al.  A "ton of feathers": gender discrimination in academic medical careers and how to manage it. , 2003, Journal of women's health.

[28]  Bonnie McElhinny,et al.  Gender, publication and citation in sociolinguistics and linguistic anthropology: The construction of a scholarly canon , 2003, Language in Society.

[29]  Steven Stack,et al.  Gender and scholarly productivity: The case of criminal justice , 2002 .

[30]  Susan Hanson.  Focus Section: Women in Geography in the 21st Centuary: Networking , 2000 .

[31]  J. Winkler,et al.  Faculty Reappointment, Tenure, and Promotion: Barriers for Women , 2000 .

[32]  Allison Macfarlane,et al.  The Environment of Gender and Science: Status and Perspectives of Women and Men in Physical Geography , 2000 .

[33]  Manuel Martínez-Bueno,et al.  Scientific Publication Trends and the Developing World , 2000, American Scientist.

[34]  B. Lubin,et al.  Gender and Scholarly Productivity in Administration in Social Work, 1977-1995 , 1999 .

[35]  Elisabeth Davenport,et al.  Who Cites women? Whom do women cite?: an Exploration of Gender and scholarly citation in Sociology , 1995, J. Documentation.

[36]  Linda Grant,et al.  Visibility and Dissemination of Women's and Men's Sociological Scholarship , 1992 .