Photovoltaic power plants: a multicriteria approach to investment decisions and a case study in western Spain

This paper proposes a compromise programming (CP) model to help investors decide whether to construct photovoltaic power plants with government financial support. For this purpose, we simulate an agreement between the government, who pursues political prices (guaranteed prices) as low as possible, and the project sponsor who wants returns (stochastic cash flows) as high as possible. The sponsor’s decision depends on the positive or negative result of this simulation, the resulting simulated price being compared to the effective guaranteed price established by the country legislation for photovoltaic energy. To undertake the simulation, the CP model articulates variables such as ranges of guaranteed prices, technical characteristics of the plant, expected energy to be generated over the investment life, investment cost, cash flow probabilities, and others. To determine the CP metric, risk aversion is assumed. As an actual application, a case study on photovoltaic power investment in Extremadura, western Spain, is developed in detail.

[1]  David Pla-Santamaria,et al.  Grading the performance of market indicators with utility benchmarks selected from Footsie: a 2000 case study , 2005 .

[2]  Y. Anwar,et al.  Income tax incentives on renewable energy industry: Case of geothermal industry in USA and Indonesia , 2011 .

[3]  Enrique Ballestero,et al.  Selecting the CP metric: A risk aversion approach , 1997 .

[4]  Juan Miguel Sánchez-Lozano,et al.  Evaluation of photovoltaic cells in a multi-criteria decision making process , 2012, Ann. Oper. Res..

[5]  Roland W. Scholz,et al.  Principles for sustainability rating of investment funds , 2005 .

[6]  T. Mazzuchi,et al.  Feasibility Analysis of Solar Photovoltaic Commercial Power Generation in California , 2012 .

[7]  Milan Zeleny Multiple criteria decision making : instructor's manual to accompany , 1982 .

[8]  M. Torres-Roldán,et al.  Mathematical approach to the characterization of daily energy balance in autonomous photovoltaic solar systems , 2016 .

[9]  P. Yu Multiple-Criteria Decision Making: "Concepts, Techniques, And Extensions" , 2012 .

[10]  Ruirui Zhao,et al.  Present status and prospects of photovoltaic market in China , 2011 .

[11]  George Mavrotas,et al.  Combined MCDA–IP Approach for Project Selection in the Electricity Market , 2003, Ann. Oper. Res..

[12]  David Pla-Santamaria,et al.  Selecting portfolios for mutual funds , 2004 .

[13]  Enrique Ballestero,et al.  Project finance: a multi-criteria approach to arbitration , 2000, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[14]  Amelia Bilbao-Terol,et al.  Selecting Portfolios Given Multiple Eurostoxx-Based Uncertainty Scenarios: A Stochastic Goal Programming Approach from Fuzzy Betas , 2009, INFOR Inf. Syst. Oper. Res..

[15]  Grant Michelson,et al.  Ethical Investment Processes and Outcomes , 2004 .

[16]  Ulf Schrader,et al.  Ignorant advice – customer advisory service for ethical investment funds , 2006 .

[17]  Geerten van de Kaa,et al.  Photovoltaic technology selection: A fuzzy MCDM approach , 2014 .

[19]  Sebastian Sitarz Compromise programming with Tchebycheff norm for discrete stochastic orders , 2013, Ann. Oper. Res..

[20]  Joshua M. Pearce,et al.  Improved parametric empirical determination of module short circuit current for modelling and optimization of solar photovoltaic systems , 2012, Solar Energy.

[21]  Kelly Sims Gallagher Why & How Governments Support Renewable Energy , 2013, Daedalus.

[22]  Enrique Ballestero,et al.  Portfolio selection on the Madrid Exchange: a compromise programming model , 2003 .

[23]  David Plà-Santamaria,et al.  Portfolio optimization based on downside risk: a mean-semivariance efficient frontier from Dow Jones blue chips , 2013, Ann. Oper. Res..

[24]  Enrique Ballestero,et al.  Compromise programming: A utility-based linear-quadratic composite metric from the trade-off between achievement and balanced (non-corner) solutions , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[25]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Selecting the optimal renewable energy using multi criteria decision making , 2013 .

[26]  Florian Lüdeke-Freund,et al.  Debt for Brands - Tracking Down a Bias in Financing Photovoltaic Projects in Germany , 2011 .

[27]  Eduardo Lorenzo,et al.  On the usefulness of stand‐alone PV sizing methods , 2000 .

[28]  A. O’Rourke,et al.  The message and methods of ethical investment , 2003 .

[29]  Aaron Chatterji,et al.  How Well Do Social Ratings Actually Measure Corporate Social Responsibility? , 2008 .

[30]  Luiz E. Brandão,et al.  Valuing the switching flexibility of the ethanol-gas flex fuel car , 2010, Ann. Oper. Res..

[31]  Joshua M. Pearce,et al.  A Review of Solar Photovoltaic Levelized Cost of Electricity , 2011 .

[32]  T. Copeland,et al.  Financial Theory and Corporate Policy. , 1980 .

[33]  Belaïd Aouni,et al.  Goal programming model: A glorious history and a promising future , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[34]  S. J. Mills,et al.  Project finance for renewable energy , 1994 .

[35]  Norbert Richter Renewable Project Finance Options: ITC, PTC, or Cash Grant? , 2009 .

[36]  Sujata Gupta,et al.  Financing Renewable Energy , 2012 .

[37]  Carlos Romero,et al.  Portfolio Selection: A Compromise Programming Solution , 1996 .