The Protective Effect of Roadside Barriers for Motorcyclists

Objective: Roadside barriers are often deployed between road users and fixed hazards to protect users from injury. However, the United States and Australian Roadside Design Guides do not consider motorcyclists in the risk-based decision process for the deployment of a barrier, because the severity indices for barriers and fixed hazards were developed for passenger vehicles. The aim of the present article is to quantify the protective effect of barriers with regards to motorcyclist injury and to thereby inform the Roadside Design Guides as to the relative severity of roadside hazards and infrastructure for motorcyclists. Method: A retrospective case series study, using linked police-reported road crash and hospital admission data in New South Wales, Australia, from 2001 to 2009 was performed. Crude and adjusted relative risks of motorcyclist serious injury were determined for various fixed objects compared to barriers, using serious injury rates and multiple variable logistic regression. Calculated relative risks compared with guardrail for motorcyclists were compared with those determined from the United States and Australian Roadside Design Guides for passenger vehicle occupants. Results: The study identified 1364 motorcyclists injured as a result of single-vehicle collisions with roadside barriers, trees, utility poles, and other fixed roadside infrastructure. Trees, posts, and utility poles were shown to provide significantly higher risks of serious injury to motorcyclists compared to barriers. This was also found to be true for serious injuries to particular body regions, such as the head, spine, and torso. The results for motorcyclists were in reasonable agreement with those derived from severity indices in the United States and Australian Roadside Design Guides for passenger vehicle occupants. Conclusions: Roadside barriers provide a significant reduction in the risk of serious injury to motorcyclists compared to various roadside hazards. The provisions in the United States and Australian Roadside Design Guides for passenger vehicle occupants are generally applicable to motorcyclists and support the prior and ongoing use of such guides for designing roadsides that reduce the risk of injury to motorcyclists. However, a more realistic estimation might be derived by increasing the severity indices for barriers by around 25 percent for motorcyclists.

[1]  Allison Daniello,et al.  Fatality risk in motorcycle collisions with roadside objects in the United States. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  Rena Friswell,et al.  Overview of Motorcycle Crash Fatalities Involving Road Safety Barriers , 2009 .

[3]  P. Johnson,et al.  Fatal and Serious Road Crashes Involving Motorcyclists , 2008 .

[4]  Allison Daniello,et al.  Characteristics of Injuries in Motorcycle-to-Barrier Collisions in Maryland , 2012 .

[5]  C Cryer,et al.  Improving the predictive ability of the ICD-based Injury Severity Score , 2008, Injury Prevention.

[6]  Allison Daniello,et al.  Effect of Barrier Type on Injury Severity in Motorcycle-to-Barrier Collisions in North Carolina, Texas, and New Jersey , 2011 .

[7]  Rena Friswell,et al.  Characteristics of fatal motorcycle crashes into roadside safety barriers in Australia and New Zealand. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  G. Zou,et al.  A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. , 2004, American journal of epidemiology.

[9]  Hampton C. Gabler,et al.  The Risk of Fatality in Motorcycle Crashes with Roadside Barriers , 2007 .

[10]  Zoran Bursac,et al.  Purposeful selection of variables in logistic regression , 2008, Source Code for Biology and Medicine.

[11]  J. Zhang,et al.  What's the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. , 1998, JAMA.

[12]  J D Langley,et al.  Diagnosis based injury severity scaling: investigation of a method using Australian and New Zealand hospitalisations , 2004, Injury Prevention.

[13]  Xiaoduan Sun,et al.  Quantifying Crash Risk under Inclement Weather with Radar Rainfall Data and Matched-Pair Method , 2011 .

[14]  Damien Jolley,et al.  Predicting trauma patient mortality: ICD [or ICD‐10‐AM] versus AIS based approaches , 2010, ANZ journal of surgery.

[15]  K Close,et al.  AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS COMPUTER SYSTEMS INDEX , 1976 .

[16]  Alberto Mansilla,et al.  Technical Bases for the Development of a Test Standard for Impacts of Powered Two-Wheelers onRoadside Barriers , 2007 .

[17]  Gary Veith,et al.  Guide to road design: part 6: roadside design, safety and barriers , 2009 .

[18]  Margaret M. Peden,et al.  World Report on Road Traffic Injury Prevention , 2004 .

[19]  Raphael H. Grzebieta,et al.  Fatality Risk for Motorcyclists in Fixed Object Collisions , 2011 .

[20]  M R Bambach,et al.  Injury typology of fatal motorcycle collisions with roadside barriers in Australia and New Zealand. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  D L Sicking,et al.  ROADSIDE SAFETY ANALYSIS PROGRAM (RSAP)--ENGINEER'S MANUAL , 2003 .