Advances in Systems and Technologies Toward Interopoerating Operational Military C2 and Simulation Systems

Abstract : Since 2003, a community focused on interoperation of command and control (C2) systems with simulation systems has developed a new area of technology known as Battle Management Language (BML). Their vision is a future where military organizations can link their C2 and simulation systems, without special preparation, in support of coalition operations. This paper reports on systems and technology developments of the last ten years, which have made great progress toward achieving that vision, as part of the work of the NATO Modeling and Simulation Group (MSG). The technology used in these projects to achieve effective operational use of C2 with interoperating simulations is based around a shared understanding of information, defined in an XML schema and implemented in each participating system. Interoperation is facilitated by an agreed upon definition of the information to be shared, recently supported by two coordinated standards: Military Scenario Definition Language (MSDL) and Coalition Battle Management Language (C-BML). The paper will review the history and current status of systems and technologies, including the standards, C2 systems, simulation systems, and server systems employed. The conclusion addresses next steps to achieve operational deployment, based on emerging commercial products and military systems.

[2]  S. Kimmel Architecture , 2013, Arsham-isms.

[3]  Raanan Lipshitz,et al.  Planning Under Time Pressure: An Attempt Toward a Prescriptive Model of Military Tactical Decision Making , 2004 .

[5]  Kevin Heffner,et al.  A systems engineering approach to M&S standards development: Application to the Coalition Battle Management Language , 2013 .

[6]  Jeff Abbott Answering The Question Why A BML Standard Has Taken So Long To Be Established ? , 2012 .

[7]  Bo Sun,et al.  Web Services based on the C2IEDM - Data Mediation and Data Storage , 2005 .

[8]  Ross Gore,et al.  Integrating CPOF, JSAF and ONESAF through CBMS , 2013 .

[9]  J. Mark Pullen,et al.  Extensible Battle Management Language as a Transformation Enabler , 2004, Simul..

[10]  L. Khimeche,et al.  Lessons learned from NMSG-085 CIG Land Operation demonstration , 2013 .

[11]  Michael R. Hieb,et al.  Developing Battle Management Language into a Web Service , 2004 .

[12]  J. M. Pullen,et al.  Supporting NATO C2-Simulation Experimentation with Scripted Web Services , 2011 .

[13]  A. Alstad,et al.  BML-enabling national C2 systems for coupling to Simulation , 2008 .

[14]  Per M. Gustavsson,et al.  Incorporating C2-Simulation Interoperability Services Into an Operational C2 System , 2013 .

[15]  Andreas Tolk,et al.  Integrating Air and Ground Operations Within a Common Battle Management Language , 2005 .

[16]  Curtis Blais Coalition Battle Management Language (C-BML) Study Group Report , 2005 .

[17]  Andreas Tolk,et al.  Joint Battle Management Language (JBML) - US Contribution to the C-BML PDG , 2007 .

[18]  Michael R. Hieb,et al.  The Environment in Network Centric Operations: A Framework for Command and Control , 2007 .

[19]  J. M. Pullen,et al.  NATO MSG-048 C-BML Final Report Summary , 2010 .