Life cycle assessment of fast pyrolysis of municipal solid waste in North Carolina of USA

Abstract This study was to investigate whether a pyrolysis plant using municipal solid waste (MSW) in North Carolina would be environmentally friendly. Based on the analysis of primary landfills and wasteflow across North Carolina, five pyrolysis plants were assumed to be built to utilize MSW. Life cycle assessment results indicate that global warming potential (GWP), acidification potential (AP), human toxicity potential (HTP) and photochem ozone creation potential (POCP) are mainly from bio-oil production, which accounts for 32.8%, 59.4%, 98.2% and 99.8% of the total potentials generated by the whole process, respectively. Besides, the main source of ozone depletion potential (ODP) and terrestric ecotoxicity potential (TETP) is electricity for bio-oil production. Eutrophication potential (EP) emission is mainly from the exhaust of diesel vehicle operation. Hydrogen and char are produced in production and upgrading of bio-oil as co-products, which generate 5.5 MJ and 2.7 MJ energy credits per kg MSW, respectively. Sensitivity analysis indicates that the yield of bio-oil is the most sensitive parameter in determining GWP and the electricity consumption also plays a significant role on GWP. The impact potentials of MSW pyrolysis were compared with those of other three alternatives of anaerobic digestion, incineration and landfill for treating MSW. Results show fast pyrolysis for bio-oil causes the least impact, while the disposal of the MSW in landfills causes the worst impact on the environment. Based on above results, pyrolysis of MSW for transportation fuels is an environment-friendly way to utilize the MSW.

[1]  A. Bridgwater,et al.  Overview of Applications of Biomass Fast Pyrolysis Oil , 2004 .

[2]  Zhaowei Zhong,et al.  Environmental Impacts of Three Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) Manufacturing Processes , 2009 .

[3]  Prasert Pavasant,et al.  Life cycle assessment of bagasse waste management options. , 2009, Waste management.

[4]  Petr Stehlík,et al.  Contribution to advances in waste-to-energy technologies. , 2009 .

[5]  Gene E. Likens,et al.  Trends in stream nitrogen concentrations for forested reference catchments across the USA , 2013 .

[6]  Arnaud Hélias,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of biodiesel production from microalgae. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  Suiran Yu,et al.  Simulation based life cycle assessment of airborne emissions of biomass-based ethanol products from different feedstock planting areas in China , 2009 .

[8]  Guiping Hu,et al.  Life cycle assessment of the production of hydrogen and transportation fuels from corn stover via fast pyrolysis , 2013 .

[9]  Paul T. Williams.  Waste Treatment and Disposal , 1998 .

[10]  David Laner,et al.  The consideration of long-term emissions from landfills within life-cycle assessment , 2009, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[11]  Cedric Briens,et al.  Flash pyrolysis of grape residues into biofuel in a bubbling fluid bed. , 2009 .

[12]  Stelvia Matos,et al.  Brazilian biofuels and social exclusion: established and concentrated ethanol versus emerging and dispersed biodiesel , 2009 .

[13]  Yrjö Solantausta,et al.  Co-processing of upgraded bio-liquids in standard refinery units - fundamentals , 2006 .

[14]  E. Benetto,et al.  Life cycle assessment of ecological sanitation system for small-scale wastewater treatment. , 2009, The Science of the total environment.

[15]  Philip H. Steele,et al.  Life-Cycle Assessment of Pyrolysis Bio-Oil Production* , 2012 .

[16]  Mats Eklund,et al.  Biofuel development initiatives in Tanzania: development activities, scales of production and conditions for implementation and utilization , 2009 .

[17]  J. W. Ponton,et al.  Biofuels: Thermodynamic sense and nonsense , 2009 .

[18]  M. K. Mann,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Coal-fired Power Production , 1999 .

[19]  Pallav Purohit.  Economic potential of biomass gasification projects under clean development mechanism in India , 2009 .

[20]  Ni-Bin Chang,et al.  Pyrolysis kinetics of refuse-derived fuel , 1999 .

[21]  Pratik N. Sheth,et al.  Differential Evolution Approach for Obtaining Kinetic Parameters in Nonisothermal Pyrolysis of Biomass , 2008 .

[22]  Manuele Margni,et al.  Life cycle assessment of two baby food packaging alternatives: glass jars vs. plastic pots , 2009 .

[23]  G N Demirer,et al.  Life cycle assessment of municipal solid waste management methods: Ankara case study. , 2006, Environment international.

[24]  T. Buchholz,et al.  Sustainability criteria for bioenergy systems: results from an expert survey , 2009 .

[25]  Stefan Bringezu,et al.  Global implications of biomass and biofuel use in Germany : recent trends and future scenarios for domestic and foreign agricultural land use and resulting GHG emissions , 2009 .

[26]  Aldo Roberto Ometto,et al.  Atmospheric impacts of the life cycle emissions of fuel ethanol in Brazil: based on chemical exergy. , 2010 .

[27]  A. Corma,et al.  Synthesis of transportation fuels from biomass: chemistry, catalysts, and engineering. , 2006, Chemical reviews.

[28]  Paul T. Williams,et al.  Characterization of Products from the Pyrolysis of Municipal Solid Waste , 2007 .