How do undergraduate STEM mentors reflect upon their mentoring experiences in an outreach program engaging K-8 youth?

BackgroundMany university students are becoming involved in mentoring programs, yet few studies describe the impact of mentoring on the mentor. Additionally, many studies report that students graduating from college are not prepared to enter the workforce in terms of key career skills and/or content knowledge. Herein, we examine the impact of our program, NE STEM 4U (Nebraska Science, Technology, Engineering and Math for You), in which undergraduate (UG) mentors engage K-8 youth in after-school STEM experiments. The UGs reflected upon their experiences using post-mentoring evaluations, 12- and 24-week interviews, and exit surveys. Many of the questions asked of the mentors related directly to their own professional development, such as self-evaluation of communication, organization, and problem-solving skills, while other questions related to content knowledge and reflection.ResultsPost-mentoring, UGs reflected on the delivery/teaching significantly more (p ≤ 0.001 for each) than other variables (i.e., their own content knowledge gains, the students’ content knowledge gains, scaffolding the lessons, or overall professional growth). By analyzing the evaluations and interviews together, some significant, self-reported gains emerged. For example, 94.15% of the UG reported that the experience was beneficial to their education. Additionally, UG mentors self-reported significant gains (p ≤ 0.01 for each) moving from 12- to 24-weeks in the program in the categories of organization, STEM content knowledge, preparedness to teach, and engagement in the program. However, UG did not report significant gains in dependability. Importantly, when mentors ranked themselves at 24-weeks, they were blinded to (unaware of) the ranking they gave themselves at 12-weeks.ConclusionsThis study helps to fill a gap in the literature by providing insight into the gains UG mentors report attaining after mentoring to K-8 students. These data suggest that participation by UGs in this program promoted self-reflection as well as self-reported gains related to career preparedness and STEM content knowledge.

[1]  G. Humiston,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of Student Engagement, Learning, and Satisfaction in Lecture Hall and Online Learning Settings. , 2009 .

[2]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[3]  Gary W. Ritter,et al.  The Effectiveness of Volunteer Tutoring Programs for Elementary and Middle School Students: A Meta-Analysis , 2009 .

[4]  Linda S. Lotto.  Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods , 1986 .

[5]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  A Scaffolding Design Framework for Software to Support Science Inquiry , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[6]  Brett D. Jones,et al.  Perspective Transformation: Effects of a Service-Learning Tutoring Experience on Prospective Teachers. , 2002 .

[7]  Tammy D. Lee,et al.  Science Center Partnership: Outreach to Students and Teachers , 2006 .

[8]  Bernice Grafstein,et al.  PBL 2.0: enhancing problem-based learning through increased student participation , 2012, Medical education online.

[9]  Sonia M. Underwood,et al.  Development and Assessment of a Molecular Structure and Properties Learning Progression. , 2012 .

[10]  Tony D. Marable.  The Role of Student Mentors in a Precollege Engineering Program , 1999 .

[11]  C. Hmelo‐Silver.  Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn? , 2004 .

[12]  Mary Lee S. Ledbetter,et al.  Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education: A Call to Action Presentation to Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience, July 2011 , 2012, Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience.

[13]  A. Carnevale,et al.  Help Wanted: Projections of Jobs and Education Requirements through 2018. , 2010 .

[14]  A. Huberman,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook , 1994 .

[15]  Rod D. Roscoe,et al.  Tutor learning: the role of explaining and responding to questions , 2008 .

[16]  Valerie L. Williams,et al.  Merging University Students into K-12 Science Education Reform , 2002 .

[17]  Henk G. Schmidt,et al.  Effects of tutor-related behaviours on the process of problem-based learning , 2011, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[18]  T. Nicholl,et al.  A Model for Small-Group Problem-Based Learning in a Large Class Facilitated by One Instructor , 2012, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

[19]  D. Allen,et al.  Approaches to biology teaching and learning: science teaching and learning across the school--university divide--cultivating conversations through scientist-teacher partnerships. , 2003, Cell biology education.

[20]  C. Hmelo‐Silver,et al.  Scaffolding and Achievement in Problem-Based and Inquiry Learning: A Response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006) , 2007 .

[21]  Patrick Lai,et al.  A comparison of the effects of problem‐based learning and lecturing on the development of students' critical thinking , 2006, Medical education.

[22]  Karen E. Levitt,et al.  Working within the Zone of Proximal Development: Formative Assessment as Professional Development , 2003 .

[23]  R. Garrett.  The observatory on borderless higher education , 2003 .

[24]  Rod D. Roscoe,et al.  Understanding Tutor Learning: Knowledge-Building and Knowledge-Telling in Peer Tutors’ Explanations and Questions , 2007 .

[25]  Robert Avanzato.  Mobile robotics for freshman design, research, and high school outreach , 2000, Smc 2000 conference proceedings. 2000 ieee international conference on systems, man and cybernetics. 'cybernetics evolving to systems, humans, organizations, and their complex interactions' (cat. no.0.

[26]  David N. Beede,et al.  STEM: Good Jobs Now and for the Future. ESA Issue Brief #03-11. , 2011 .

[27]  Christine E. Cutucache,et al.  NE STEM 4U: an out-of-school time academic program to improve achievement of socioeconomically disadvantaged youth in STEM areas , 2016 .

[28]  L. Vygotsky,et al.  The Development of Scientific Concepts in Childhood. , 1962 .

[29]  S. Arnott,et al.  Schools of thought , 1985, Nature.

[30]  Susan R. Singer,et al.  Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. , 2012 .

[31]  Xiaodong Lin,et al.  Designing technology to support reflection , 1999 .

[32]  Candice L. Garwood,et al.  An Objective Structured Clinical Examination to Assess Problem-Based Learning , 2012, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

[33]  Xianglei Chen.  STEM Attrition: College Students' Paths into and out of STEM Fields. Statistical Analysis Report. NCES 2014-001. , 2013 .

[34]  Carol Bond,et al.  Undergraduates' experiences of critical thinking , 2004 .

[35]  Erin L. Dolan.  Next Steps for Vision and Change: Moving from Setting the Vision to Change , 2012, CBE life sciences education.

[36]  Stacey L. Carpenter.  Undergraduates’ Perceived Gains and Ideas About Teaching and Learning Science From Participating in Science Education Outreach Programs , 2015 .

[37]  Marcy P. Osgood,et al.  PULSE Vision & Change Rubrics , 2013, CBE life sciences education.

[38]  Xiufeng Liu,et al.  Supporting the Development of Science Communication Skills in STEM University Students: Understanding their learning experiences as they work in middle and high school classrooms , 2015 .

[39]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation , 2009 .