Vulnerability Evaluation of Logistics Transportation Networks under Seismic Disasters

The concept of vulnerability analysis is related to evaluating the consequences of network degradation caused by incidents such as social or natural disasters. Many methodologies have been proposed to evaluate transportation network vulnerability by quantifying the consequences of partial network degradation. However, the consequences of network degradation without a consideration of the probability of degradation are not enough to show the vulnerability features of a network under a specific disaster. In fact, because degradation of some parts of a network may have great consequences but a low probability of occurrence, it would not be reasonable to say that these parts are vulnerable. A methodology is proposed to scan the vulnerability of logistics transportation networks under seismic disasters. This methodology considers both the difference caused by component degradation and the probability of component degradation caused by a seismic disaster. The results will be helpful in forming a reinforcement policy for resisting seismic damage. An appropriate measurement of performance specific to logistics transportation networks, total generalized cost, is used in this method. Finally, visual results of the vulnerability evaluation of a study network are demonstrated with geographic information system technology.

[1]  Anne FINDING THE n MOST VITAL LINKS IN FLOW NETWORKS , 2022 .

[2]  Anne S. Kiremidjian,et al.  Method for Probabilistic Evaluation of Seismic Structural Damage , 1996 .

[3]  Wen Long Yue,et al.  THE ROLE OF TRANSPORTATION IN LOGISTICS CHAIN , 2005 .

[4]  R. Kevin Wood,et al.  Shortest‐path network interdiction , 2002, Networks.

[5]  Tom Petersen,et al.  Importance and Exposure in Road Network Vulnerability Analysis , 2006 .

[6]  M. Di Gangi,et al.  Transportation network vulnerability indicators for risk evaluation and exposition reduction , 2005 .

[7]  Satish V. Ukkusuri,et al.  A methodology to assess the criticality of highway transportation networks , 2009 .

[8]  J.,et al.  Earthquake prediction: a critical review , 1997 .

[9]  Michael A. P. Taylor,et al.  DENSE NETWORK TRAFFIC MODELS, TRAVEL TIME RELIABILITY AND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT. II: APPLICATION TO NETWORK RELIABILITY , 1999 .

[10]  Glen M. D'Este,et al.  Application of Accessibility Based Methods for Vulnerability Analysis of Strategic Road Networks , 2006 .

[11]  Kunihiro Kishi,et al.  Transportation Network Vulnerability , 2014 .

[12]  Erik Jenelius,et al.  Developing a methodology for road network vulnerability analysis , 2006 .

[13]  Dai Nakagawa,et al.  A study on the Evaluation of the Freight Train Network using High Speed Passenger Tracks , 2006 .

[14]  Gian Michele Calvi,et al.  A study on damage scenarios for residential buildings in Catania city , 1999 .

[15]  A J Richardson,et al.  TRAVEL TIME VARIABILITY ON COMMUTER JOURNEYS , 1978 .

[16]  Guido Magenes,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF SEISMIC VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGIES OVER THE PAST 30 YEARS , 2006 .

[17]  Fumio Yamazaki,et al.  Fragility curves for expressway embankments based on damage datasets after recent earthquakes in Japan , 2010 .

[18]  Alan T. Murray,et al.  Critical network infrastructure analysis: interdiction and system flow , 2007, J. Geogr. Syst..

[19]  Katja Berdica,et al.  AN INTRODUCTION TO ROAD VULNERABILITY: WHAT HAS BEEN DONE, IS DONE AND SHOULD BE DONE , 2002 .

[20]  Angelo Masi,et al.  Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Gravity Load Designed R/C Frames , 2003 .

[21]  A. Smolka,et al.  THE PRINCIPLE OF RISK PARTNERSHIP AND THE ROLE OF INSURANCE IN RISK MITIGATION , 2002 .

[22]  H Yang,et al.  RELIABILITY OF TRANSPORT NETWORKS. CHAPTER 9. TRAVEL TIME VERSUS CAPACITY RELIABILITY OF A ROAD NETWORK , 2001 .