Modeling electric vehicle adoption considering a latent travel pattern construct and charging infrastructure

Abstract This paper presents a behavioral model of public, revealed preferences (RP) for various types of electric vehicles (EVs) while accounting for a latent (green) travel pattern construct and charging infrastructure characteristics . Specifically, a two-level nested logit (NL) model is estimated to explain households’ fuel type choice among five alternatives and three nests: (1) battery electric vehicles (BEVs); (2) hybrid vehicles including hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) and plug-in HEVs (PHEVs); and (3) conventional vehicles including gasoline and diesel vehicles. Further, a latent travel pattern construct which captures a week-long number of trips by non-vehicle travel modes as well as daily vehicle and tollway use is estimated in a structural equation setting and subsequently fed into the NL model. Using a recent RP dataset from the California Household Travel Survey, we identify market segments for alternative fuel types based on households’ socio-economic characteristics, built environment factors concerning public plug-in EV (PEV) charging infrastructure characteristics, latent and observable travel behavior factors of a household vehicle’s principal driver, and vehicle attributes. The results highlight that the number of public PEV charging stations is only significant for households choosing PHEVs and interestingly insignificant in the BEV utility. Furthermore, the sensitivity analysis of the findings reveals that PHEV users are elastic with respect to household vehicle ownership ratio and the latent green travel pattern construct, while BEV users are inelastic to any explanatory variable.

[1]  Zhenhong Lin,et al.  Promoting the Market for Plug-In Hybrid and Battery Electric Vehicles , 2011 .

[2]  F. Koppelman,et al.  The generalized nested logit model , 2001 .

[3]  Reinhard Madlener,et al.  Consumer Preferences for Alternative Fuel Vehicles: A Discrete Choice Analysis , 2012 .

[4]  Eric Molin,et al.  Consumer preferences for electric vehicles: a literature review , 2017 .

[5]  A. Satorra,et al.  Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. , 1994 .

[6]  Zhaomiao Guo,et al.  Residual value analysis of plug-in vehicles in the United States , 2019, Energy Policy.

[7]  Cinzia Cirillo,et al.  A time-dependent stated preference approach to measuring vehicle type preferences and market elasticity of conventional and green vehicles , 2017 .

[8]  D. McFadden,et al.  MIXED MNL MODELS FOR DISCRETE RESPONSE , 2000 .

[9]  Joan L. Walker,et al.  How, when and why integrated choice and latent variable models are latently useful , 2016 .

[10]  Stefan Lindhard Mabit,et al.  Demand for alternative-fuel vehicles when registration taxes are high , 2011 .

[11]  John M. Rose,et al.  Can you ever be certain? Reducing hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments via respondent reported choice certainty , 2016 .

[12]  Aldo Goia,et al.  Demographic processes in a model of innovation diffusion with dynamic market , 2007 .

[13]  Stephane Hess,et al.  A joint model for vehicle type and fuel type choice: evidence from a cross-nested logit study , 2012 .

[14]  Jillian Anable,et al.  The role of instrumental, hedonic and symbolic attributes in the intention to adopt electric vehicles , 2013 .

[15]  Scott Hardman,et al.  The effectiveness of financial purchase incentives for battery electric vehicles – A review of the evidence , 2017 .

[16]  H. Timmermans,et al.  Expanding scope of hybrid choice models allowing for mixture of social influences and latent attitudes: Application to intended purchase of electric cars , 2014 .

[17]  D. Bolduc,et al.  Sequential and Simultaneous Estimation of Hybrid Discrete Choice Models , 2010 .

[18]  Andreas R. Ziegler,et al.  Individual Characteristics and Stated Preferences for Alternative Energy Sources and Propulsion Technologies in Vehicles: A Discrete Choice Analysis , 2010 .

[19]  Abolfazl Mohammadian,et al.  Shared versus private mobility: Modeling public interest in autonomous vehicles accounting for latent attitudes , 2018, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[20]  D. McFadden.  The Choice Theory Approach to Market Research , 1986 .

[21]  John R. Hauser,et al.  DESTINATION CHOICE BEHAVIOR FOR NON-GROCERY-SHOPPING TRIPS , 1978 .

[22]  Saba Siddiki,et al.  The Role of Public Policy in Technology Diffusion: The Case of Plug-in Electric Vehicles. , 2018, Environmental science & technology.

[23]  Francisco J. Bahamonde-Birke,et al.  Is Sequential Estimation a Suitable Second Best for Estimation of Hybrid Choice Models? , 2014 .

[24]  Ali Nejat,et al.  A comprehensive model of regional electric vehicle adoption and penetration , 2017 .

[25]  J. H. Steiger.  Structural Model Evaluation and Modification: An Interval Estimation Approach. , 1990, Multivariate behavioral research.

[26]  Mark J. Koetse,et al.  A choice experiment on alternative fuel vehicle preferences of private car owners in the Netherlands , 2014 .

[27]  Jonn Axsen,et al.  Lifestyle Practices and Proenvironmental Technology , 2012 .

[28]  Harry Timmermans,et al.  Understanding the relationship between travel satisfaction and subjective well-being considering the role of personality traits: A structural equation model , 2017 .

[29]  Abolfazl Mohammadian,et al.  Dynamic Household Vehicle Decision Modeling Considering Plug-In Electric Vehicles , 2018, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

[30]  Joan L. Walker,et al.  Integration of Choice and Latent Variable Models , 1999 .

[31]  Francisco J. Bahamonde-Birke,et al.  Analyzing the continuity of attitudinal and perceptual indicators in hybrid choice models , 2015 .

[32]  D. Yeager,et al.  Comparing the Accuracy of RDD Telephone Surveys and Internet Surveys Conducted with Probability and Non-Probability Samples , 2011 .

[33]  Pavlos S. Kanaroglou,et al.  Household demand and willingness to pay for clean vehicles , 2007 .

[34]  Enrico Benetto,et al.  Agent-based modelling for assessing hybrid and electric cars deployment policies in Luxembourg and Lorraine , 2014 .

[35]  Georg Bühler,et al.  The impact of fuel availability on demand for alternative-fuel vehicles , 2012 .

[36]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  Evolution of the household vehicle fleet: Anticipating fleet composition, PHEV adoption and GHG emissions in Austin, Texas , 2011 .

[37]  Lixian Qian,et al.  Heterogeneous consumer preferences for alternative fuel cars in China , 2011 .

[38]  Elisabetta Cherchi,et al.  On the stability of preferences and attitudes before and after experiencing an electric vehicle , 2013 .

[39]  Romeo Danielis,et al.  Simulating the market penetration of cars with alternative fuelpowertrain technologies in Italy , 2015 .

[40]  F. Sprei,et al.  A review of consumer preferences of and interactions with electric vehicle charging infrastructure , 2018, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

[41]  Patrick De Pelsmacker,et al.  Emotions as determinants of electric car usage intention , 2012 .

[42]  Thomas F. Golob,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling For Travel Behavior Research , 2001 .

[43]  Mark Ferguson,et al.  Size matters: How vehicle body type affects consumer preferences for electric vehicles , 2017 .

[44]  Johan Jansson,et al.  Advances in consumer electric vehicle adoption research: A review and research agenda , 2015 .

[45]  Margaret J. Eppstein,et al.  An agent-based model to study market penetration of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles , 2011 .

[46]  Takanori Ida,et al.  Consumers’ willingness to pay for alternative fuel vehicles: A comparative discrete choice analysis between the US and Japan , 2014 .

[47]  Elizabeth A Stuart,et al.  Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward. , 2010, Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics.

[48]  H. Williams.  On the Formation of Travel Demand Models and Economic Evaluation Measures of User Benefit , 1977 .

[49]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  A New Estimation Approach to Integrate Latent Psychological Constructs in Choice Modeling , 2014 .

[50]  Wei Ji,et al.  Electric Vehicle Fast Charger Planning for Metropolitan Planning Organizations , 2015 .

[51]  Maria Johansson,et al.  The effects of attitudes and personality traits on mode choice , 2006 .

[52]  Michael A Nicholas,et al.  Exploring the Impact of the Federal Tax Credit on the Plug-In Vehicle Market , 2016 .

[53]  Soora Rasouli,et al.  Influence of Social Networks on Latent Choice of Electric Cars: A Mixed Logit Specification Using Experimental Design Data , 2016 .

[54]  Garrett. Barter,et al.  The Future Adoption and Benefit of Electric Vehicles: A Parametric Assessment , 2013 .

[55]  Zhenhong Lin,et al.  What drives the market for plug-in electric vehicles? - A review of international PEV market diffusion models , 2018, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[56]  D. McFadden.  Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[57]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[58]  Barbara M. Byrne,et al.  Structural equation modeling with EQS : basic concepts, applications, and programming , 2000 .

[59]  Sebastián Raveau,et al.  Inclusion of latent variables in Mixed Logit models: Modelling and forecasting , 2010 .

[60]  Ricardo A. Daziano,et al.  Forecasting Adoption of Ultra-Low-Emission Vehicles Using Bayes Estimates of a Multinomial Probit Model and the GHK Simulator , 2014, Transp. Sci..

[61]  Kalidas Ashok,et al.  Extending Discrete Choice Models to Incorporate Attitudinal and Other Latent Variables , 2002 .

[62]  Meryl P. Gardner,et al.  Willingness to pay for electric vehicles and their attributes , 2011 .