Numbers Matter to Informed Patient Choices

Background. How drug adverse events (AEs) are communicated in the United States may mislead consumers and result in low adherence. Requiring written information to include numeric AE-likelihood information might lessen these effects, but providing numbers may disadvantage less skilled populations. The objective was to determine risk comprehension and willingness to use a medication when presented with numeric or nonnumeric AE-likelihood information across age, numeracy, and cholesterol-lowering drug-use groups. Methods. In a cross-sectional Internet survey (N = 905; American Life Panel, 15 May 2008 to 18 June 2008), respondents were presented with a hypothetical prescription medication for high cholesterol. AE likelihoods were described using 1 of 6 formats (nonnumeric: consumer medication information (CMI)–like list, risk labels; numeric: percentage, frequency, risk labels + percentage, risk labels + frequency). Main outcome measures were risk comprehension (recoded to indicate presence/absence of risk overestimation and underestimation), willingness to use the medication (7-point scale; not likely = 0, very likely = 6), and main reason for willingness (chosen from 8 predefined reasons). Results. Individuals given nonnumeric information were more likely to overestimate risk, were less willing to take the medication, and gave different reasons than those provided numeric information across numeracy and age groups (e.g., among the less numerate, 69% and 18% overestimated risks in nonnumeric and numeric formats, respectively; among the more numerate, these same proportions were 66% and 6%). Less numerate middle-aged and older adults, however, showed less influence of numeric format on willingness to take the medication. It is unclear whether differences are clinically meaningful, although some differences are large. Conclusions. Providing numeric AE-likelihood information (compared with nonnumeric) is likely to increase risk comprehension across numeracy and age levels. Its effects on uptake and adherence of prescribed drugs should be similar across the population, except perhaps in older, less numerate individuals.

[1]  William J. Burns,et al.  Risk Perception and the Economic Crisis: A Longitudinal Study of the Trajectory of Perceived Risk , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[2]  I. Lipkus Numeric, Verbal, and Visual Formats of Conveying Health Risks: Suggested Best Practices and Future Recommendations , 2007, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[3]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Effect of communication strategy on personal risk perception and treatment adherence intentions , 2009, Psychology, health & medicine.

[4]  Lisa M. Schwartz,et al.  The Role of Numeracy in Understanding the Benefit of Screening Mammography , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[5]  Cathy Schoen,et al.  Physician–Patient Communication About Prescription Medication Nonadherence: A 50-state Study of America’s Seniors , 2007, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[6]  Ellen Peters,et al.  Breast Cancer Patients’ Treatment Expectations after Exposure to the Decision Aid Program Adjuvant Online: The Influence of Numeracy , 2010, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[7]  P. Knapp,et al.  Communicating risk of medication side effects: An empirical evaluation of EU recommended terminology , 2003 .

[8]  Robin Gregory,et al.  Making sense of uncertainty: advantages and disadvantages of providing an evaluative structure , 2012 .

[9]  P. Knapp,et al.  Comparison of two methods of presenting risk information to patients about the side effects of medicines , 2004, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[10]  W. Bruin,et al.  Judgment and Decision Making as a Skill: Aging and decision skills , 2011 .

[11]  B. Rimer,et al.  General Performance on a Numeracy Scale among Highly Educated Samples , 2001, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[12]  Vicki L Burt,et al.  Prescription drug use continues to increase: U.S. prescription drug data for 2007-2008. , 2010, NCHS data brief.

[13]  Peter H. Schwartz Questioning the Quantitative Imperative: Decision Aids, Prevention, and the Ethics of Disclosure , 2011, The Hastings Center report.

[14]  J. Concato,et al.  Unwillingness of rheumatoid arthritis patients to risk adverse effects. , 2002, Rheumatology.

[15]  A. L. Dal-Fabbro,et al.  Adherence to long term therapies: evidence for action , 2005 .

[16]  R. Kravitz,et al.  Physician communication when prescribing new medications. , 2006, Archives of internal medicine.

[17]  Rosalie Dominik,et al.  Understanding risk: a randomized controlled trial of communicating contraceptive effectiveness. , 2003, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[18]  J. Tulsky,et al.  Provider-patient communication about antidepressants among veterans with mental health conditions. , 2007, The American journal of geriatric pharmacotherapy.

[19]  T. Brennan,et al.  Informed consent and the prescription of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. , 1992, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[20]  P. Slovic,et al.  Numeracy skill and the communication, comprehension, and use of risk-benefit information. , 2007, Health affairs.

[21]  Paul K J Han,et al.  Varieties of uncertainty in health care: a conceptual taxonomy. , 2011, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[22]  Carole L Kimberlin,et al.  Evaluation of consumer medication information dispensed in retail pharmacies. , 2010, Archives of Internal Medicine.

[23]  William H Shrank,et al.  Educating patients about their medications: the potential and limitations of written drug information. , 2007, Health affairs.

[24]  V. Reyna,et al.  How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making. , 2009, Psychological bulletin.

[25]  T. Sensky,et al.  Systematic Review of the Effects of Shared Decision-Making on Patient Satisfaction, Treatment Adherence and Health Status , 2008, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics.

[26]  Daniel Västfjäll,et al.  Adult Age Differences in Dual Information Processes: Implications for the Role of Affective and Deliberative Processes in Older Adults' Decision Making , 2007, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[27]  Michael Pignone,et al.  Numeracy and the medical student's ability to interpret data. , 2002, Effective clinical practice : ECP.

[28]  K. Cox,et al.  A systematic review of the research on communication between patients and health care professionals about medicines: the consequences for concordance , 2004, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[29]  C. K. Mertz,et al.  Less Is More in Presenting Quality Information to Consumers , 2007, Medical care research and review : MCRR.

[30]  Pamela K. Smith,et al.  Models of visuospatial and verbal memory across the adult life span. , 2002, Psychology and aging.

[31]  P. Knapp,et al.  Provision of information about drug side-effects to patients , 2002, The Lancet.

[32]  P. Slovic,et al.  The Use of Narrative Evidence and Explicit Likelihood by Decisionmakers Varying in Numeracy , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[33]  Steven Woloshin,et al.  Using a Drug Facts Box to Communicate Drug Benefits and Harms Two Randomized Trials , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[34]  M. Galesic,et al.  Using plausible group sizes to communicate information about medical risks. , 2011, Patient education and counseling.

[35]  G. Elwyn,et al.  How Should Effectiveness of Risk Communication to Aid Patients' Decisions Be Judged? , 1999, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[36]  C. Charles,et al.  Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). , 1997, Social science & medicine.

[37]  Paul K J Han,et al.  Communicating the Uncertainty of Harms and Benefits of Medical Interventions , 2007, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[38]  Peter Knapp,et al.  Over the counter medicines and the need for immediate action: a further evaluation of European Commission recommended wordings for communicating risk. , 2004, Patient education and counseling.

[39]  C. K. Mertz,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Numeracy and Decision Making , 2022 .

[40]  Paul K. J. Han,et al.  Varieties of Uncertainty in Health Care , 2011 .

[41]  Natalie A. Obrecht,et al.  Physicians' communication of Down syndrome screening test results: The influence of physician numeracy , 2011, Genetics in Medicine.

[42]  K. Okuyemi,et al.  How much information about adverse effects of medication do patients want from physicians? , 2001, Archives of internal medicine.

[43]  Lisa M. Schwartz,et al.  The value of benefit data in direct-to-consumer drug ads. , 2004, Health affairs.

[44]  Steven Woloshin,et al.  The Drug Facts Box: Providing Consumers with Simple Tabular Data on Drug Benefit and Harm , 2007, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[45]  Ellen Peters,et al.  Development and Testing of an Abbreviated Numeracy Scale: A Rasch Analysis Approach: Rasch-Based Numeracy Scale , 2013 .

[46]  D. Berry Informing people about the risks and benefits of medicines: implications for the safe and effective use of medicinal products. , 2006, Current drug safety.

[47]  Peter Knapp,et al.  Patients’ Understanding of Risk Associated with Medication Use , 2003, Drug safety.