Considerations for the use of assistive technology in patients with impaired states of consciousness

While there is limited literature addressing the application of assistive technology in patients in persistent vegetative state (PVS) and minimally conscious state (MCS), it is believed that it can assist with the assessment, diagnosis and treatment as well as management of these patients. The use of technology to assist in PVS and MCS is mostly limited to the application of simple binary switch devices to determine whether a motor response is consistent or otherwise. However, the application of such technology is often undermined due to a lack of established protocols for use by the multidisciplinary team (MDT), as well as a lack of available technical resources. Therefore the ongoing development of assessment instruments as well as effective outcome measures used by an MDT is imperative. This article aims to discuss some key aspects to consider in the use of assistive technology when assessing and treating people in impaired conscious states. Possible considerations and suggestions will be discussed through this paper and a case study will be used to demonstrate some of these interventions.

[1]  H Gill-Thwaites,et al.  The Sensory Modality Assessment Rehabilitation Technique--a tool for assessment and treatment of patients with severe brain injury in a vegetative state. , 1997, Brain injury.

[2]  J. Carr.  Movement Science: Foundations for Physical Therapy in Rehabilitation , 1987 .

[3]  O. Piguet,et al.  Assessment of minimally responsive patients: clinical difficulties of single-case design. , 1999, Brain injury.

[4]  Robert W. Bailey,et al.  Human performance engineering: using human factors/ergonomics to achieve computer system usability (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[5]  David Bates,et al.  The vegetative state: guidance on diagnosis and management. , 2003, Clinical medicine.

[6]  J Angelo,et al.  Factors affecting the use of a single switch with assistive technology devices. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[7]  S. Kolakowsky-Hayner,et al.  A Structured Approach to Family Intervention After Brain Injury , 2002, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[8]  A. M. Gentile,et al.  Movement Science: Implicit and Explicit Processes during Acquisition of Functional Skills , 1998 .

[9]  B. Wilson,et al.  Assessing a minimally responsive brain injured person , 1999 .

[10]  T. McMillan,et al.  Neuropsychological assessment of a potential "euthanasia" case: a 5 year follow up. , 2000, Brain injury.

[11]  Angelo Canedo,et al.  An analysis of assessment instruments for the minimally responsive patient (MRP): clinical observations , 2002, Brain injury.

[12]  M. Rappaport,et al.  Evaluation of coma and vegetative states. , 1992, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[13]  Albert M. Cook,et al.  Assistive Technologies: Principles and Practice , 1995 .

[14]  M. O'dell,et al.  Standardized assessment instruments for minimally-responsive, brain-injured patients. , 1996, NeuroRehabilitation.

[15]  K. Andrews,et al.  Misdiagnosis of the vegetative state: retrospective study in a rehabilitation unit , 1996, BMJ.

[16]  A. Gentile,et al.  Skill acquisition : Action, movement, and neuromotor processes , 1987 .

[17]  B. J. Ansell,et al.  The Western Neuro Sensory Stimulation Profile: a tool for assessing slow-to-recover head-injured patients. , 1989, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[18]  D. W. Ellis,et al.  The Sensory Stimulation Assessment Measure (SSAM): a tool for early evaluation of severely brain-injured patients. , 1994, Brain injury.

[19]  Joseph T. Giacino,et al.  Rehabilitative Management of Patients With Disorders of Consciousness: Grand Rounds , 2004, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[20]  J. Giacino,et al.  The Vegetative and Minimally Conscious States: A Comparison of Clinical Features and Functional Outcome , 1997 .

[21]  R. Munday,et al.  The Sensory Modality Assessment and Rehabilitation Technique (SMART): A Comprehensive and Integrated Assessment and Treatment Protocol for the Vegetative State and Minimally Responsive Patient , 1999 .

[22]  T. McMillan.  Neuropsychological assessment after extremely severe head injury in a case of life or death. , 1997, Brain injury.

[23]  M J Campbell,et al.  The Wessex Head Injury Matrix (WHIM) main scale: a preliminary report on a scale to assess and monitor patient recovery after severe head injury , 2000, Clinical rehabilitation.