Impaired expression of NER gene network in sporadic solid tumors

Nucleotide repair genes are not generally altered in sporadic solid tumors. However, point mutations are found scattered throughout the genome of cancer cells indicating that the repair pathways are dysfunctional. To address this point, in this work we focus on the expression pathways rather than in the DNA structure of repair genes related to either genome stability or essential metabolic functions. We present here a novel statistical analysis comparing ten gene expression pathways in human normal and cancer cells using serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE) data. We find that in cancer cells nucleotide-excision repair (NER) and apoptosis are the most impaired pathways and have a highly altered diversity of gene expression profile when compared to normal cells. We propose that genome point mutations in sporadic tumors can be explained by a structurally conserved NER with a functional disorder generated from its entanglement with the apoptosis gene network.

[1]  Christian von Mering,et al.  STRING: known and predicted protein–protein associations, integrated and transferred across organisms , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[2]  Tomas Lindahl,et al.  Human DNA repair genes, 2005. , 2005, Mutation research.

[3]  G. Kroemer,et al.  Apoptosis and genomic instability , 2004, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[4]  T. Hubbard,et al.  A census of human cancer genes , 2004, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[5]  Andreas Prlic,et al.  Ensembl 2006 , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[6]  C. Harris,et al.  p53: traffic cop at the crossroads of DNA repair and recombination , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[7]  Richard D. Wood,et al.  Human DNA Repair Genes , 2001, Science.

[8]  Sarah A Teichmann,et al.  Conservation of gene co-regulation in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. , 2002, Trends in biotechnology.

[9]  J. Milner,et al.  p53 is a chromatin accessibility factor for nucleotide excision repair of DNA damage , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[10]  J. Jiricny The multifaceted mismatch-repair system , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[11]  K. Kinzler,et al.  Cancer genes and the pathways they control , 2004, Nature Medicine.

[12]  H. van Steeg,et al.  Nucleotide excision repair- and p53-deficient mouse models in cancer research. , 2005, Mutation research.

[13]  Christian von Mering,et al.  STRING: a database of predicted functional associations between proteins , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[14]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[15]  Jean Marx,et al.  Debate Surges Over the Origins of Genomic Defects in Cancer , 2002, Science.

[16]  Sue Povey,et al.  Genew: the Human Gene Nomenclature Database, 2004 updates , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[17]  J. Hoeijmakers Genome maintenance mechanisms for preventing cancer , 2001, Nature.

[18]  J. Ford,et al.  p53 and DNA damage-inducible expression of the xeroderma pigmentosum group C gene , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[20]  W. Kendal The use of information theory to analyze genomic changes in neoplasia. , 1990, Mathematical biosciences.

[21]  P. Duesberg,et al.  The Chromosomal Basis of Cancer , 2005, Cellular oncology : the official journal of the International Society for Cellular Oncology.

[22]  Kiyoko F. Aoki-Kinoshita,et al.  From genomics to chemical genomics: new developments in KEGG , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[23]  Sue Povey,et al.  Genew: the Human Gene Nomenclature Database , 2002, Nucleic Acids Res..

[24]  Jason H Bielas,et al.  Generation of mutator mutants during carcinogenesis. , 2006, DNA repair.

[25]  C. Maley,et al.  Cancer is a disease of clonal evolution within the body1–3. This has profound clinical implications for neoplastic progression, cancer prevention and cancer therapy. Although the idea of cancer as an evolutionary problem , 2006 .

[26]  T. Grisar,et al.  Housekeeping genes as internal standards: use and limits. , 1999, Journal of biotechnology.

[27]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  The significance of unstable chromosomes in colorectal cancer , 2003, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[28]  G. Parmigiani,et al.  The Consensus Coding Sequences of Human Breast and Colorectal Cancers , 2006, Science.

[29]  Joshua M. Stuart,et al.  A Gene-Coexpression Network for Global Discovery of Conserved Genetic Modules , 2003, Science.

[30]  Kenneth H Buetow,et al.  An anatomy of normal and malignant gene expression , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[32]  José C. F. Moreira,et al.  Chromosome aberrations in solid tumors have a stochastic nature. , 2006, Mutation research.

[33]  Peer Bork,et al.  Medusa: a simple tool for interaction graph analysis , 2005, Bioinform..

[34]  José C. F. Moreira,et al.  Profiling cytogenetic diversity with entropy-based karyotypic analysis. , 2005, Journal of Theoretical Biology.

[35]  Gregory D. Schuler,et al.  Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[36]  P. Hanawalt,et al.  Expression of the p48 xeroderma pigmentosum gene is p53-dependent and is involved in global genomic repair. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  S. Altschul,et al.  SAGEmap: a public gene expression resource. , 2000, Genome research.

[38]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Lethality and centrality in protein networks , 2001, Nature.

[39]  J. Ptak,et al.  Three classes of genes mutated in colorectal cancers with chromosomal instability. , 2004, Cancer research.

[40]  Robert A Gatenby,et al.  Information dynamics in carcinogenesis and tumor growth. , 2004, Mutation research.

[41]  K. Loeb,et al.  Multiple mutations and cancer , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.