Follow the Money: Analyzing @slpng_giants_pt's Strategy to Combat Misinformation

In 2020, the activist movement @sleeping_giants_pt (SGB) made a splash in Brazil. Similar to its international counterparts, the movement carried "campaigns" against media outlets spreading misinformation. In those, SGB targeted companies whose ads were shown in these outlets, publicly asking them to remove the ads. In this work, we present a careful characterization of SGB’s activism model, analyzing the three campaigns carried by the movement up to September 2020. We study how successful its complaints were and what factors are associated with their success, how attention towards the targeted media outlets progressed, and how online interactions with the companies were impacted after they were targeted. Leveraging an annotated corpus of SGB’s tweets as well as other data from Twitter and Google Search, we show that SGB’s “campaigns” were largely successful: over 83% of the requests (n=192) were acceptably answered, and, for those that received an answer, we find user pressure to be negatively correlated with the time companies take to respond (r=-0.67; p<0.001). Finally, we find that, although changes in the interactions with companies were transient, the impact in targeted media outlets endured: all three outlets experienced a significant decrease in engagement on Twitter and search volume on Google following the start of SGB’s campaigns. Overall, our work suggests that internet-based activism can leverage the transient attention it captures towards concrete goals to have a long-lasting impact.

[1]  Joshua A. Braun,et al.  Activism, Advertising, and Far-Right Media: The Case of Sleeping Giants , 2019 .

[2]  Mathias Klang,et al.  The Case for Digital Activism , 2020 .

[3]  Cherian George The Net Delusion: How not to liberate the world , 2013 .

[4]  W. Bennett,et al.  Communicating Global Activism , 2003 .

[5]  A. Chasteen,et al.  The ironic impact of activists: Negative stereotypes reduce social change influence , 2013 .

[6]  Sarah J. Jackson,et al.  #HashtagActivism: Networks of Race and Gender Justice , 2020 .

[7]  Ethan Zuckerman,et al.  Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election , 2017 .

[8]  Shahla Ghobadi,et al.  "These days will never be forgotten ...": A critical mass approach to online activism , 2015, Inf. Organ..

[9]  D. Stolle,et al.  Spill-Over Effects Between Facebook and On/Offline Political Participation? Evidence from a Two-Wave Panel Study , 2014 .

[10]  Francesca Colli Indirect consumer activism and politics in the market , 2020, Social Movement Studies.

[11]  Lee Rainie,et al.  The future of truth and misinformation online , 2017 .

[12]  ThelwallMike,et al.  Sentiment strength detection in short informal text , 2010 .

[13]  Henrik Serup Christensen Political activities on the Internet: Slacktivism or political participation by other means? , 2011, First Monday.

[14]  Molly Sauter Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest , 2017 .

[15]  Yu-Hao Lee,et al.  Does slacktivism hurt activism?: the effects of moral balancing and consistency in online activism , 2013, CHI.

[16]  Devin Gaffney #iranElection: quantifying online activism , 2010 .