A Comparison of Outcomes Between Robotic-Assisted, Single-Site Laparoscopy Versus Laparoendoscopic Single Site for Benign Hysterectomy.

[1]  A. Fader,et al.  Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique. , 2015, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[2]  A. Akdemir,et al.  Learning curve analysis of intracorporeal cuff suturing during robotic single-site total hysterectomy. , 2014, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.

[3]  G. Scambia,et al.  Laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy: is it safe and feasible? , 2014, Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology.

[4]  A. Akdemir,et al.  Single-site robotic total hysterectomy: standardization of technique and surgical outcomes. , 2014, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.

[5]  J. Nam,et al.  Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgical Staging for Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer , 2014, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[6]  G. Scambia,et al.  Robotic single-site hysterectomy (RSS-H) vs. laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy (LESS-H) in early endometrial cancer: a double-institution case-control study. , 2013, Gynecologic oncology.

[7]  Jason Knight,et al.  da Vinci® single‐site platform: anthropometrical, docking and suturing considerations for hysterectomy in the cadaver model , 2012, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[8]  Nicole Donnellan,et al.  Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence After Different Modes of Hysterectomy , 2011, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  R. Farnam.  Robotic Single-Incision Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Novel Surgical Technique , 2011 .

[10]  Jennifer M Wu,et al.  Hysterectomy Rates in the United States, 2003 , 2007, Obstetrics and gynecology.