ANTECEDENTS OF INTERVIEW INTERACTIONS, INTERVIEWERS' RATINGS, AND APPLICANTS' REACTIONS

This study examined the effects of two antecedents–interviewers' perceived screening-recruiting priorities and training–on interview interactions and outcomes. Data from 39 interview transcripts, 364 interviewer evaluations, and 106 applicant surveys were analyzed. Results showed that recruitment-oriented interviewers talked 50% more, volunteered twice as much information, and asked half as many questions as did joint-focus or screening-oriented interviewers. Trained interviewers asked more secondary, open, and performance-differentiating questions than did untrained interviewers and were less likely to discuss non-job-related topics. The untrained (but not the trained) interviewers became significantly harsher in their evaluations as their orientations shifted from recruitment to screening. Although applicants detected behavioral differences by interviewers' orientations and training, these differences did not affect their attraction to interviewers' organizations. Research and practical implications are highlighted.

[1]  C. Stevens,et al.  Making the right impression: A field study of applicant impression management during job interviews. , 1995 .

[2]  John R. Hollenbeck,et al.  The effects of interview focus on recruitment effectiveness : a field experiment , 1994 .

[3]  Thomas W. Dougherty,et al.  Influences of Campus Recruiting on Applicant Attraction to Firms , 1992 .

[4]  Michael M. Harris.  RECONSIDERING THE EMPLOYMENT INTERVIEW: A REVIEW OF RECENT LITERATURE AND SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH , 1989 .

[5]  Michael M. Harris,et al.  A FIELD STUDY OF APPLICANT REACTIONS TO EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES: DOES THE RECRUITER MAKE A DIFFERENCE? , 1987 .

[6]  T. J. Bergmann,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL RECRUITMENT ACTIVITIES AND APPLICANTs' REACTIONS AT DIFFERENT STAGES OF THE RECRUITMENT PROCESS , 1987 .

[7]  John W. Boudreau,et al.  College Recruiting in Large Organizations: Practice, Evaluation, and Research Implications. , 1986 .

[8]  Ronald J. Ebert,et al.  Policy capturing in the employment interview. , 1986 .

[9]  Charles C. Manz,et al.  Linking Cognition and Behavior: A Script Processing Interpretation of Vicarious Learning , 1985 .

[10]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Scripts in Organizational Behavior , 1984 .

[11]  Fredric M. Jablin,et al.  Effects of question type, orientation, and sequencing in the employment screening interview 1 , 1983 .

[12]  Robert L. Dipboye,et al.  Self-Fulfilling Prophecies in the Selection-Recruitment Interview , 1982 .

[13]  R. Abelson.  Psychological status of the script concept. , 1981 .

[14]  D. Jackson,et al.  Impressions of Personality in the Employment Interview. , 1980 .

[15]  M. Hakel,et al.  JOB APPLICANT ATTRIBUTES JUDGED IMPORTANT ACROSS SEVEN DIVERSE OCCUPATIONS , 1971 .

[16]  W. Tullar,et al.  Relational control in the employment interview. , 1989 .

[17]  P. Rowe.  Decision processes in personnel selection , 1984 .