Performance of a computer-aided program for automated matching of metastatic pulmonary nodules detected on follow-up chest CT.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of a computer-aided program that allows automated matching of metastatic pulmonary nodules imaged with two serial clinical chest CT studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS The cases of 30 patients with metastatic pulmonary nodules depicted on two serial clinical MDCT scans (16- or 64-MDCT, 5-mm section thickness) were studied. The number of nodules per patient varied from a minimum of two to innumerable. A maximum of 10 well-defined solid nodules per patient, a total of 210 nodules, were selected from each baseline CT scan and were evaluated for matching detection in follow-up CT by means of an automated program. Substantial changes in lung findings and lung volumes between serial scans were visually assessed. The effects on matching rate of interval lung changes and location, size, and total number of nodules in the lung were analyzed with contingency tables. Chi-square tests were used to evaluate patterns for statistical significance. RESULTS The nodule-matching rate per patient ranged from 0 to 100% (median, 87.5%). By nodule, the overall matching rate was 140 of 210 (66.7%). Matching rate was highly associated with changes in lung quality between serial studies. Matching of 122 of 148 nodules (82.4%) occurred in 23 patients with relatively unchanged lung findings, compared with 18 of 62 nodules (29.0%) in seven patients with substantial interval changes (p < 0.001). The matching rate decreased with an increased total number of nodules per lung. For 10 or fewer nodules per lung, matching was successful for 31 of 36 nodules; for 11-50 nodules per lung, 60 of 73 nodules; for 51-100 nodules per lung, 33 of 47 nodules; and for more than 100 nodules per lung, 16 of 54 nodules (p < 0.001). The matching rate was not significantly different with location or size of nodules. CONCLUSION The rate of automated matching of metastatic pulmonary nodules on clinical serial CT scans was high (82.4%) when the lung findings and lung expansion between the serial scans were relatively unchanged. The rate decreased significantly, however, with substantial interval changes in the lung and a larger number of nodules.

[1]  David Spizarny,et al.  Final results of the Lung Screening Study, a randomized feasibility study of spiral CT versus chest X-ray screening for lung cancer. , 2005, Lung cancer.

[2]  M. Giger,et al.  Computerized Detection of Pulmonary Nodules in Computed Tomography Images , 1994, Investigative radiology.

[3]  M. van Glabbeke,et al.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[4]  S. Armato,et al.  Computerized detection of pulmonary nodules on CT scans. , 1999, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[5]  G. Angelelli,et al.  Multi slice computed tomography in the study of pulmonary metastases , 2008, La radiologia medica.

[6]  E R Heitzman,et al.  The role of computed tomography in the diagnosis and management of lung cancer. An overview. , 1986, Chest.

[7]  B. Odry,et al.  Klinische Evaluation einer Software zur automatischen Lokalisation von Lungenrundherden in CT-Verlaufskontrollen , 2004, RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren.

[8]  K. Bae,et al.  Pulmonary nodules: automated detection on CT images with morphologic matching algorithm--preliminary results. , 2005, Radiology.

[9]  Margrit Betke,et al.  Landmark detection in the chest and registration of lung surfaces with an application to nodule registration , 2003, Medical Image Anal..

[10]  Margrit Betke,et al.  Chest CT: automated nodule detection and assessment of change over time--preliminary experience. , 2001, Radiology.

[11]  Li Fan,et al.  Knowledge-based automatic detection of multitype lung nodules from multidetector CT studies , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[12]  Binsheng Zhao,et al.  Small pulmonary nodules: volumetrically determined growth rates based on CT evaluation. , 2000, Radiology.

[13]  O. Miettinen,et al.  Survival of Patients with Stage I Lung Cancer Detected on CT Screening , 2008 .

[14]  W J Kostis,et al.  Computer-aided diagnosis for lung cancer. , 2000, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[15]  M. McNitt-Gray,et al.  Lung micronodules: automated method for detection at thin-section CT--initial experience. , 2003, Radiology.

[16]  O. Miettinen,et al.  Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening , 1999, The Lancet.

[17]  Paul Pinsky,et al.  Baseline findings of a randomized feasibility trial of lung cancer screening with spiral CT scan vs chest radiograph: the Lung Screening Study of the National Cancer Institute. , 2004, Chest.