On the “tuning” of autoconversion parameterizations in climate models

Autoconversion is a highly nonlinear process, which is usually evaluated in global climate models (GCMs) from the mean in-cloud value of the liquid-water mixing ratio q′l. This biases the calculated autoconversion rate, and may explain why it usually seems to be necessary to reduce the autoconversion threshold to an unrealistically low value to obtain a realistic simulation in a GCM. Two versions of a threshold-dependent autoconversion parameterization are compared in the CSIRO GCM. In the standard (“OLD”) treatment, autoconversion occurs in a grid box whenever the mean in-cloud q′l exceeds the threshold qcrit, which is derived from a prescribed threshold cloud-droplet radius rcrit. In the modified (“NEW”) version, the assumed subgrid moisture distribution from the model's condensation scheme is applied in each grid box to determine the fraction of the cloudy area in which q′l > qcrit, and autoconversion occurs in this fraction only. Simulations are performed using both treatments, for present-day and preindustrial distributions of cloud-droplet concentration, and using different values for rcrit. Changing from the OLD to the NEW treatment means that rcrit can be increased from 7.5 μm to a more realistic 9.3 μm, while maintaining the global-mean liquid-water path at about the same value. Simulations for preindustrial and present-day conditions are compared, to see whether the change of scheme alters the modeled cloud-lifetime effect. It is found that the NEW scheme with rcrit = 9.3 μm gives a 0.5 W m−2 (62%) stronger cloud-lifetime effect than the OLD scheme with rcrit = 7.5 μm.

[1]  L. Rotstayn Climate Sensitivity of the CSIRO GCM: Effect of Cloud Modeling Assumptions , 1999 .

[2]  Darren L. Jackson,et al.  A physical retrieval of cloud liquid water over the global oceans using special sensor microwave/imager (SSM/I) observations , 1993 .

[3]  J. W. Telford A NEW ASPECT OF COALESCENCE THEORY , 1955 .

[4]  U. Lohmann,et al.  Comparing Different Cloud Schemes of a Single Column Model by Using Mesoscale Forcing and Nudging Technique , 1999 .

[5]  Olivier Boucher,et al.  The sulfate‐CCN‐cloud albedo effect , 1995 .

[6]  R. Smith A scheme for predicting layer clouds and their water content in a general circulation model , 1990 .

[7]  J. Katzfey,et al.  A Scheme for Calculation of the Liquid Fraction in Mixed-Phase Stratiform Clouds in Large-Scale Models , 2000 .

[8]  W. Cotton,et al.  The Physics of the Marine Stratocumulus-Capped Mixed Layer. , 1987 .

[9]  Robert Pincus,et al.  Precipitation in Stratocumulus Clouds: Observational and Modeling Results. , 1995 .

[10]  J. Penner,et al.  Global Emissions and Models of Photochemically Active Compounds , 1994 .

[11]  B. Albrecht Aerosols, Cloud Microphysics, and Fractional Cloudiness , 1989, Science.

[12]  Jorgen B. Jensen,et al.  Microphysical and short‐wave radiative structure of stratocumulus clouds over the Southern Ocean: Summer results and seasonal differences , 1998 .

[13]  Joyce E. Penner,et al.  Indirect effect of sulfate and carbonaceous aerosols: A mechanistic treatment , 2000 .

[14]  Harry T. Ochs,et al.  Warm-Rain Initiation: An Overview of Microphysical Mechanisms. , 1993 .

[15]  D. Randall,et al.  Liquid and Ice Cloud Microphysics in the CSU General Circulation Model. Part 1: Model Description and Simulated Microphysical Processes , 1996 .

[16]  Variability in concentrations of cloud condensation nuclei in the marine cloud–topped boundary layer , 1993 .

[17]  K. D. Beheng A parameterization of warm cloud microphysical conversion processes , 1994 .

[18]  L. Rotstayn A physically based scheme for the treatment of stratiform clouds and precipitation in large‐scale models. II: Comparison of modelled and observed climatological fields , 1998 .

[19]  L. Delobbe Simulation of marine stratocumulus: effect of precipitation parameterization and sensitivity to droplet number concentration , 1998, Boundary-Layer Meteorology.

[20]  William R. Cotton,et al.  A Numerical Investigation of Several Factors Contributing to the Observed Variable Intensity of Deep Convection over South Florida , 1980 .

[21]  E. Kessler On the distribution and continuity of water substance in atmospheric circulations , 1969 .

[22]  U. Lohmann,et al.  Impact of sulfate aerosols on albedo and lifetime of clouds: A sensitivity study with the ECHAM4 GCM , 1997 .

[23]  F. Weng,et al.  Retrieval of cloud liquid water using the special sensor microwave imager (SSM/I) , 1994 .

[24]  Zhaoxin Li,et al.  Sensitivity of an atmospheric general circulation model to prescribed SST changes: feedback effects associated with the simulation of cloud optical properties , 1991 .

[25]  H. Treut,et al.  Precipitation and radiation modeling in a general circulation model: Introduction of cloud microphysical processes , 1995 .

[26]  Andrew J. Heymsfield,et al.  Precipitation Development in Stratiform Ice Clouds: A Microphysical and Dynamical Study , 1977 .

[27]  Leon D. Rotstayn,et al.  Indirect forcing by anthropogenic aerosols: A global climate model calculation of the effective‐radius and cloud‐lifetime effects , 1999 .

[28]  Ulrike Lohmann,et al.  Design and performance of a new cloud microphysics scheme developed for the ECHAM general circulation model , 1996 .

[29]  Damian R. Wilson,et al.  A microphysically based precipitation scheme for the UK meteorological office unified model , 1999 .

[30]  P. Rowntree,et al.  A Mass Flux Convection Scheme with Representation of Cloud Ensemble Characteristics and Stability-Dependent Closure , 1990 .

[31]  Leon D. Rotstayn,et al.  A physically based scheme for the treatment of stratiform clouds and precipitation in large‐scale models. I: Description and evaluation of the microphysical processes , 1997 .

[32]  Philip J. Rasch,et al.  A Comparison of the CCM3 Model Climate Using Diagnosed and Predicted Condensate Parameterizations , 1998 .

[33]  Hilding Sundqvist,et al.  A parameterization scheme for non-convective condensation including prediction of cloud water content , 1978 .