Instructional supports for students with disabilities in K-5 computing: Findings from a cross-case analysis

As computer programming and computational thinking (CT) become more integrated into K-12 instruction, content teachers and special educators need to understand how to provide instructional supports to a wide range of learners, including students with disabilities. This cross-case analysis study examined the supports that two students with disabilities, who were initially disengaged during computing activities, received during computing instruction. Data revealed that students' support needs during computing activities were not CT-specific. Rather, supports specific to these students' needs that were successful in other educational areas were also successful and sufficient in CT. Although additional studies would need to be conducted to ascertain the transferability of these findings to other contexts and students, our results contribute evidence that students with disabilities can and should participate in CT and be provided with the supports they need, just as in all other areas of the curriculum. We present a framework for evaluating student engagement to identify student-specific supports and, when needed, refine the emerging K-12 CT pedagogy to facilitate full participation of all students. We then offer a list of four implications for practice based on the findings. Study of two elementary students with disabilities during computing instruction.Students with disabilities participated in computing instruction with supports.Effective student-specific supports from other subjects can be applied in computing.Refining emerging K-12 computing pedagogy may be needed for participation of all.

[1]  David H. Rose,et al.  Teaching Every Student in the Digital Age: Universal Design for Learning , 2002 .

[2]  Mark Guzdial Bringing evidence-based education to CS , 2015, Commun. ACM.

[3]  Fred Martin,et al.  Integrating computational thinking across the K--8 curriculum , 2014, Inroads.

[4]  Mark Guzdial,et al.  Subgoals, Context, and Worked Examples in Learning Computing Problem Solving , 2015, ICER.

[5]  M. F. Giangreco,et al.  “Be Careful What You Wish for …”: Five Reasons to be concerned about the Assignment of Individual Paraprofessionals , 2005 .

[6]  Maya Israel,et al.  Empowering K–12 Students With Disabilities to Learn Computational Thinking and Computer Programming , 2015 .

[7]  Shuchi Grover,et al.  Computational Thinking in K–12 , 2013 .

[8]  M. Patton Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice , 2014 .

[9]  Richard E. Ladner,et al.  Increasing the Participation of People with Disabilities in Computing Fields , 2007, Computer.

[10]  Yves Lachapelle,et al.  Conceptualizing supports and the support needs of people with intellectual disability. , 2009, Intellectual and developmental disabilities.

[11]  Richard E. Ladner,et al.  The impact of the United Nations convention on the rights of persons with disabilities , 2014, Commun. ACM.

[12]  Elena M. Umland,et al.  A Common Language for Interprofessional Education: The World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) , 2013 .

[13]  Richard E. Ladner,et al.  Introduction to AccessCS10K and Accessible Tools for Teaching Programming , 2015, SIGCSE.

[14]  Julie N. Causton-Theoharis The Golden Rule of Providing Support in Inclusive Classrooms: Support others as You Would Wish to Be Supported , 2009 .

[15]  Alfred V. Aho,et al.  Computation and Computational Thinking , 2012, Comput. J..

[16]  Robert T. Jiménez,et al.  Qualitative Studies in Special Education , 2005 .

[17]  Janet B W Williams Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , 2013 .

[18]  Maya Israel,et al.  Supporting all learners in school-wide computational thinking: A cross-case qualitative analysis , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[19]  Jeannette M. Wing An introduction to computer science for non-majors using principles of computation , 2007, SIGCSE.

[20]  James D. Basham,et al.  A Comprehensive Approach to RTI: Embedding Universal Design for Learning and Technology , 2010 .

[21]  Robert E. Stake,et al.  Multiple Case Study Analysis , 2005 .

[22]  Richard E. Ladner,et al.  Strategies for increasing the participation in computing of students with disabilities , 2012, INROADS.

[23]  Yasmin B. Kafai,et al.  Computer Programming Goes Back to School , 2013 .

[24]  Maureen E. Angell,et al.  Self-Determination: Hearing the Voices of Adults with Physical Disabilities. , 2006 .

[25]  Grace Meo,et al.  Curriculum Planning for All Learners: Applying Universal Design for Learning (UDL) to a High School Reading Comprehension Program , 2008 .

[26]  Mark Guzdial,et al.  Subgoal-labeled instructional material improves performance and transfer in learning to develop mobile applications , 2012, ICER '12.

[27]  Mark Guzdial,et al.  What do we do when the jobs are gone, and why we must embrace active learning , 2015, Commun. ACM.

[28]  Thomas D. Snyder,et al.  Digest of Education Statistics , 1994 .