Self-monitoring in social networks

Web 2.0 has changed the technological landscape of the internet computing world today. The shift from traditional web which is also known as Web 1.0 is forced by the growing need for more efficient information sharing, collaboration, and business processes. The disclosure of personal/organisational information in Web 2.0 via social networks, digital contributions and data feeds has created new security and privacy challenges. Designing transparent, usable systems in support of personal privacy, security, and trust, requires advanced knowledge retrieval techniques that can support information sharing processes by applying appropriate policies. This paper proposes a Web 2.0 analysis methodology that provides reusable foundation components for information extraction, analysis and visualisation. These components can be used by the same method can be also used by individuals to make a self-test of their Web 2.0 contributions and find out what inferences will be derived from their web presence.

[1]  Ricardo Baeza-Yates,et al.  Information Retrieval: Data Structures and Algorithms , 1992 .

[2]  Michael E. Lesk,et al.  Automatic sense disambiguation using machine readable dictionaries: how to tell a pine cone from an ice cream cone , 1986, SIGDOC '86.

[3]  A Min Tjoa,et al.  Context Oriented Analysis of Web 2.0 Social Network Contents - MindMeister Use-Case , 2010, ACIIDS.

[4]  John C. Mallery.  Thinking About Foreign Policy: Finding an Appropriate Role for Artificially Intelligent Computers , 1988 .

[5]  方华.  google,我,萨娜 , 2006 .

[6]  R. Darnell.  Translation , 1873, The Indian medical gazette.

[7]  Michael Fitzgerald,et al.  Google ajax search api , 2007 .

[8]  Christiane Fellbaum,et al.  Combining Local Context and Wordnet Similarity for Word Sense Identification , 1998 .

[9]  Venkata Subramaniam,et al.  Information Retrieval: Data Structures & Algorithms , 1992 .

[10]  Ted Briscoe,et al.  32nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 27-30 June 1994, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA, Proceedings , 1994, ACL.

[11]  Ted Pedersen,et al.  Extended Gloss Overlaps as a Measure of Semantic Relatedness , 2003, IJCAI.

[12]  Tim O'Reilly,et al.  What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software , 2007 .

[13]  Martha Palmer,et al.  Verb Semantics and Lexical Selection , 1994, ACL.

[14]  Joseph Becker,et al.  Information Retrieval and Processing , 1975 .

[15]  Efthimis N. Efthimiadis,et al.  Conversational tagging in twitter , 2010, HT '10.

[16]  M. V. Velzen,et al.  Self-organizing maps , 2007 .

[17]  Martin Chodorow,et al.  Combining local context and wordnet similarity for word sense identification , 1998 .

[18]  Steven Pemberton,et al.  RDFa in XHTML: Syntax and Processing , 2008 .

[19]  冯利芳.  Facebook , 2020, The SAGE International Encyclopedia of Mass Media and Society.

[20]  Dmitri Roussinov,et al.  A Scalable Self-organizing Map Algorithm for Textual Classification: A Neural Network Approach to Thesaurus Generation , 1998 .

[21]  C. Bauckhage,et al.  Analyzing Social Bookmarking Systems : A del . icio . us Cookbook , 2008 .

[22]  Hsinchun Chen,et al.  Internet Categorization and Search: A Self-Organizing Approach , 1996, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent..

[23]  Adam Kilgarriff,et al.  Framework and Results for English SENSEVAL , 2000, Comput. Humanit..