Numerical validation and parametric investigation on the cold flow field of a typical cavity-based scramjet combustor

Abstract The three-dimensional coupled implicit Reynolds Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations and the two equation standard k – e turbulence model has been employed to numerically simulate the cold flow field in a typical cavity-based scramjet combustor. The numerical results show reasonable agreement with the schlieren photograph and the pressure distribution available in the open literature. The pressure distribution after the first pressure rise is under-predicted. There are five shock waves existing in the cold flow field of the referenced combustor. The first and second pressure rises on the upper wall of the combustor are predicted accurately with the medium grid. The other three shock waves occur in the core flow of the combustor. The location of the pressure rise due to these three shock waves could not be predicted accurately due to the presence of recirculation zone downstream of the small step. Further, the effect of length-to-depth ratio of the cavity and the back pressure on the wave structure in the combustor has been investigated. The obtained results show that there is an optimal length-to-depth ratio for the cavity to restrict the movement of the shock wave train in the flow field of the scramjet combustor. The low velocity region in the cavity affects the downstream flow field for low back pressure. The intensity of the shock wave generated at the exit of the isolator depends on the back pressure at the exit of the combustor and this in turn affects the pressure distribution on the upper wall of the combustor.

[1]  Wei Huang,et al.  Research status of key techniques for shock-induced combustion ramjet (shcramjet) engine , 2010 .

[2]  Randall T. Voland,et al.  X-43A Hypersonic vehicle technology development , 2006 .

[3]  Campbell D. Carter,et al.  Stability limits of cavity-stabilized flames in supersonic flow , 2005 .

[4]  Lin Ma,et al.  Investigation on the flameholding mechanisms in supersonic flows: backward-facing step and cavity flameholder , 2010, J. Vis..

[5]  J. Le,et al.  An experimental investigation of the cold flowfield in a model scramjet combustor , 2009 .

[6]  Chin‐Hsiang Cheng,et al.  Buoyancy-induced periodic flow and heat transfer in lid-driven cavities with different cross-sectional shapes , 2005 .

[7]  Chang-Kee Kim,et al.  Cavity Flows in a Scramjet Engine by the Space-Time Conservation and Solution Element Method , 2004 .

[8]  Lin Ma,et al.  Hydrogen Fueled Scramjet Combustor - the Impact of Fuel Injection , 2010 .

[9]  Lin Ma,et al.  Effect of geometric parameters on the drag of the cavity flameholder based on the variance analysis method , 2012 .

[10]  Wei Huang,et al.  Effect of cavity flame holder configuration on combustion flow field performance of integrated hypersonic vehicle , 2010 .

[11]  David W. Zingg,et al.  A perspective on turbulence models for aerodynamic flows , 2009 .

[12]  Ronald K. Hanson,et al.  Cavity Flame-Holders for Ignition and Flame Stabilization in Scramjets: An Overview , 2001 .

[13]  Jing Lei,et al.  Numerical investigation on the shock wave transition in a three-dimensional scramjet isolator , 2011 .

[14]  S. Baek,et al.  Numerical study on supersonic combustion with cavity-based fuel injection , 2004 .

[15]  Jing Lei,et al.  A parametric study on the aerodynamic characteristics of a hypersonic waverider vehicle , 2011 .

[16]  A. Napartovich,et al.  Plasma-Assisted Combustion of Gaseous Fuel in Supersonic Duct , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[17]  Zhenguo Wang,et al.  Drag force investigation of cavities with different geometric configurations in supersonic flow , 2011 .

[18]  N. S. Vikramaditya,et al.  Effect of aft wall slope on cavity pressure oscillations in supersonic flows , 2009, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[19]  E. Erdem,et al.  Numerical and experimental investigation of transverse injection flows , 2010 .

[20]  Hyungrok Do,et al.  Plasma assisted cavity flame ignition in supersonic flows , 2010 .

[21]  Sébastien Deck,et al.  A DES method applied to a Backward Facing Step reactive flow , 2009 .

[22]  Lin Ma,et al.  Overview of Fuel Injection Techniques for Scramjet Engines , 2011 .

[23]  F. A. Greene,et al.  Turbulent Supersonic/Hypersonic Heating Correlations for Open and Closed Cavities , 2009 .

[24]  E. T. Curran,et al.  Scramjet Engines: The First Forty Years , 2001 .

[25]  Toshiaki Setoguchi,et al.  Computational Study on the Critical Nozzle Flow of High-Pressure Hydrogen Gas , 2008 .

[26]  Lin Ma,et al.  Parametric effects in a scramjet engine on the interaction between the air stream and the injection , 2012 .

[27]  W. Jones,et al.  The prediction of laminarization with a two-equation model of turbulence , 1972 .

[28]  B. Launder,et al.  The numerical computation of turbulent flows , 1990 .

[29]  Chih-Jen Sung,et al.  An Experimental Study of Kerosene Combustion in a Supersonic Model Combustor Using Effervescent Atomization , 2005 .

[30]  J. Driscoll,et al.  Combustion characteristics of a dual-mode scramjet combustor with cavity flameholder , 2009 .

[31]  Dimitri Papamoschou,et al.  Supersonic flow separation in planar nozzles , 2009 .