An Experimental Investigation of a Wing-Fuselage Junction Model in the NASA Langley 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Wind Tunnel

Current turbulence models, such as those employed in Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes CFD, are unable to reliably predict the onset and extent of the three-dimensional separated flow that typically occurs in wing-fuselage junctions. To critically assess, as well as to improve upon, existing turbulence models, experimental validation-quality flow-field data in the junction region is needed. In this report, we present an overview of experimental measurements on a wing-fuselage junction model that addresses this need. The experimental measurements were performed in the NASA Langley 14by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel. The model was a full-span wing-fuselage body that was configured with truncated DLR-F6 wings, both with and without leading-edge extensions at the wing root. The model was tested at a fixed chord Reynolds number of 2.4 million, and angles-of-attack ranging from -10 degrees to +10 degrees were considered. Flow-field measurements were performed with a pair of miniature laser Doppler velocimetry (LDV) probes that were housed inside the model and attached to three-axis traverse systems. One LDV probe was used to measure the separated flow field in the trailing-edge junction region. The other LDV probe was alternately used to measure the flow field in the leading-edge region of the wing and to measure the incoming fuselage boundary layer well upstream of the leading edge. Both LDV probes provided measurements from which all three mean velocity components, all six independent components of the Reynolds-stress tensor, and all ten independent components of the velocity triple products were calculated. In addition to the flow-field measurements, static and dynamic pressures were measured at selected locations on the wings and fuselage of the model, infrared imaging was used to characterize boundary-layer transition, oil-flow visualization was used to visualize the separated flow in the leadingand trailing-edge regions of the wing, and unsteady shear stress was measured at limited locations using capacitive shear-stress sensors. Sample results from the measurement techniques employed during the test are presented and discussed.

[1]  P. Miles,et al.  Geometry of the fringe field formed in the intersection of two Gaussian beams. , 1996, Applied optics.

[2]  SemIh M. Ölçmen,et al.  An experimental study of a three-dimensional pressure-driven turbulent boundary layer , 1995 .

[3]  M. A. Kegerise,et al.  Wind Tunnel Test of a Risk-Reduction Wing/Fuselage Model to Examine Juncture-Flow Phenomena , 2016 .

[4]  Albert L. Braslow,et al.  Simplified method for determination of critical height of distributed roughness particles for boundary-layer transition at Mach numbers from 0 to 5 , 1958 .

[5]  Adam Hurst,et al.  An Experimental Frequency Response Characterization of MEMS Piezoresistive Pressure Transducers , 2014 .

[6]  William L. Oberkampf,et al.  Experimental Methodology for Computational Fluid Dynamics Code Validation , 1998 .

[7]  R. Simpson,et al.  Time-depeiident and time-averaged turbulence structure near the nose of a wing-body junction , 1990, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[8]  F. B. Gessner,et al.  The origin of secondary flow in turbulent flow along a corner , 1973, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[9]  G. Corcos Resolution of Pressure in Turbulence , 1963 .

[10]  R. M. Hicks,et al.  Use of grit-type boundary-layer transition trips on wind-tunnel models , 1966 .

[11]  Ping Tcheng,et al.  Model attitude measurements at NASA Langley Research Center , 1992 .

[12]  Luther N. Jenkins,et al.  Boundary Condition Study for the Juncture Flow Experiment in the NASA Langley 14x22-Foot Subsonic Wind Tunnel , 2017 .

[13]  Peter Bradshaw,et al.  The turbulence structure of equilibrium boundary layers , 1967, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[14]  Michael J. Hemsch,et al.  Repeatability Modeling for Wind-Tunnel Measurements: Results for Three Langley Facilities , 2014 .

[15]  Günter Schewe,et al.  On the structure and resolution of wall-pressure fluctuations associated with turbulent boundary-layer flow , 1983, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[16]  V. C. Patel Calibration of the Preston tube and limitations on its use in pressure gradients , 1965, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[17]  Richard M. Lueptow Transducer resolution and the turbulent wall pressure spectrum , 1995 .

[18]  Gregory M. Gatlin,et al.  The Langley 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel: Description, Flow Characteristics, and Guide for Users , 1990 .

[19]  C. Rumsey,et al.  Goals and Status of the NASA Juncture Flow Experiment , 2016 .

[20]  Christopher L. Rumsey,et al.  The NASA Juncture Flow Experiment: Goals, Progress, and Preliminary Testing (Invited) , 2016 .

[21]  Dan H. Neuhart,et al.  Free-Stream Turbulence Intensity in the Langley 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel , 2004 .

[22]  T. Papanastasiou,et al.  Viscous Fluid Flow , 1999 .

[23]  C. Tropea,et al.  Laser Doppler and Phase Doppler Measurement Techniques , 2002 .

[24]  W. Devenport,et al.  Experimental Visualization of Junction Separation Bubbles at Low- to Moderate-Reynolds Numbers , 2016 .

[25]  Edward N. Tinoco,et al.  Abridged Summary of the Third AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Drag Prediction Workshop , 2008 .

[26]  Hugh W. Coleman,et al.  Experimentation and Uncertainty Analysis for Engineers , 1989 .

[27]  K. A. Shinpaugh,et al.  Signal-processing techniques for low signal-to-noise ratio laser Doppler velocimetry signals , 1992 .

[28]  Andy D. Boney Data Reduction Functions for the Langley 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel , 2014 .

[29]  Roger L. Simpson,et al.  An advanced laser-Doppler velocimeter for full-vector particle position and velocity measurements , 2009 .

[30]  William L. Oberkampf,et al.  Estimation of Uncertainties for a Model Validation Experiment in a Wind Tunnel , 2017 .