BAYESIAN NETWORKS MODEL FOR DIALOGUE ACT RECOGNITION BASED ON INTRA-UTTERANCE FEATURES AND INTER-UTTERANCES CONTEXT

Abstract Previous dialogue act recognition models assume inter-utterances independency, in which each utteranceis independent of the preceding utterance given the preceding utterance dialogue act. Accordingly,in these models, the recognition of the dialogue act of an utterance depends on the linguistic featuresextracted from the utterance itself and the dialogue act of the preceding utterance. This paperpresents a Bayesian Networks model for dialogue act recognition in a dialogue system. In addition tothe linguistic features of the user utterance and the previous utterance dialogue act, the presentedmodel employs inter-utterances context which results from relaxing inter-utterance independencyassumption. To design the model two sets of linguistic features have been identified, intra-utterancefeatures extracted from the user utterance and context features extracted from the previous utterance.Bayesian networks machine learning has been used to induce the networks from a task orienteddialogue corpus. A series of experimental cases have been conducted to evaluate the Bayesian Networksmodel. In each case, different features have been used. The results show that the inter-utterance contextis an effective factor in the recognition of dialogue act and the model which is based on intra-utterancefeatures and inter-utterances context has the highest recognition accuracy.Keywords: Dialogue act recognition, dialogue system, bayesian networks, machine learning

[1]  Dan Jurafsky,et al.  Pragmatics and Computational Linguistics , 2008 .

[2]  Norbert Reithinger,et al.  Dialogue act classification using language models , 1997, EUROSPEECH.

[3]  C. Raymond Perrault,et al.  A Plan-Based Analysis of Indirect Speech Act , 1980, CL.

[4]  Arne Jönsson,et al.  Wizard of Oz studies -- why and how , 1993, Knowl. Based Syst..

[5]  J. Searle Expression and Meaning: A taxonomy of illocutionary acts , 1975 .

[6]  Edward Ivanovic,et al.  Dialogue Act Tagging for Instant Messaging Chat Sessions , 2005, ACL.

[7]  Andreas Stolcke,et al.  Can Prosody Aid the Automatic Classification of Dialog Acts in Conversational Speech? , 1998, Language and speech.

[8]  Ken Samuel,et al.  Automatically Selecting Useful Phrases for Dialogue Act Tagging , 1999, ArXiv.

[9]  Wray L. Buntine Operations for Learning with Graphical Models , 1994, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[10]  Daniel Jurafsky,et al.  Lexical, Prosodic, and Syntactic Cues for Dialog Acts , 1998 .

[11]  P. Spirtes,et al.  Causation, prediction, and search , 1993 .

[12]  Andreas Stolcke,et al.  Dialogue act modeling for automatic tagging and recognition of conversational speech , 2000, CL.

[13]  Simon Keizer,et al.  Reasoning under Uncertainty in Natural Language Dialogue using Bayesian Networks , 2003 .

[14]  Kevin B. Korb,et al.  Bayesian Artificial Intelligence , 2004, Computer science and data analysis series.

[15]  Jennifer Chu-Carroll,et al.  A Statistical Model for Discourse Act Recognition in Dialogue Interactions , 1998 .

[16]  Anton Nijholt,et al.  Dialogue Act Recognition with Bayesian Networks for Dutch Dialogues , 2002, SIGDIAL Workshop.

[17]  David J. Spiegelhalter,et al.  Local computations with probabilities on graphical structures and their application to expert systems , 1990 .

[18]  T. Daniel Midgley,et al.  Discourse Chunking: A Tool in Dialogue Act Tagging , 2003, ACL.