Viscosity Discrimination: A Comparison of an Adaptive Two-Alternative Forced-Choice and an Adjustment Procedure

Differential thresholds for viscosity were measured in ten subjects with the use of an adaptive two-alternative forced-choice procedure. An electromagnetic linear motor was connected to each wrist and the viscosity of the motors was under computer servo control. For each block of 50 trials the viscosity of one motor was fixed at a reference value which ranged from 4 to 512 N s m−1, and the viscosity of the other motor varied according to the subject's responses. On each trial subjects were required to indicate which motor had the greater viscosity and were given feedback of the correct response. By this procedure the Weber fraction for viscosity was calculated to be 19%, which is lower than the Weber fraction of 34% estimated by using the method of adjustment. The criterion used for determining the threshold differs in the two procedures (71% and 84% correct, respectively), and the results from the two studies were found to be consistent. They suggest that the Weber fraction for viscosity remains remarkably stable despite differences in the methods of measurement.

[1]  G. W. Blair,et al.  The Subjective Judgment of the Elastic and Plastic Properties of Soft Bodies; the , 1939 .

[2]  W. N. Kellogg.  An experimental comparison of psychophysical methods , 2022 .

[3]  D. M. Green,et al.  Comparison of method‐of‐adjustment and forced‐choice procedures in frequency discrimination , 1975 .

[4]  Micha Peleg.  THEORETICAL ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MECHANICAL HARDNESS AND ITS SENSORY ASSESSMENT , 1980 .

[5]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Tactual discrimination of softness. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  N. Durlach,et al.  Manual discrimination of force using active finger motion , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  H. Levitt.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Scaling of Apparent Viscosity , 1964, Science.

[9]  Mandayam A. Srinivasan,et al.  Manual resolution of viscosity and mass , 1995 .

[10]  G. W. Scott Blair,et al.  THE SUBJECTIVE JUDGEMENT OF THE ELASTIC AND PLASTIC PROPERTIES OF SOFT BODIES , 1940 .

[11]  R. J. Irwin,et al.  Differential thresholds for limb movement measured using adaptive techniques , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  Lynette A. Jones,et al.  A Teleoperated Microsurgical Robot and Associated Virtual Environment for Eye Surgery , 1993, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[13]  L. Jones,et al.  Perception of force and weight: theory and research. , 1986, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  J G Kreifeldt,et al.  Moment of inertia: psychophysical study of an overlooked sensation. , 1979, Science.

[15]  B. Cardozo.  Adjusting the Method of Adjustment: SD vs DL , 1965 .