Leveraging Digital On-Board Processing to Increase Communications Satellite Flexibility and Effective Capacity

Communications satellite service providers, acutely aware of their need to remain competitive with terrestrial alternatives, have embraced payload technologies promising to lower their costs of service. Multi-Beam Antennas (MBAs), Digital Channelizers (DCs), Digital Channelizer Beamformers (DCBs) and even Fully Regenerative Processors (FRPs which demodulate, decode, packet switch, encode and modulate communications paths) have been adopted when the Size, Weight and Power (SWaP), financial and risk costs of doing so are outweighed by the increases in effective communications capacity and flexibility realized. The continuing advance of Moore’s Law in space together with advances in signal processing architectures have dramatically reduced the SWaP, monetary and risk costs of exploiting Digital On-Board Processing (OBP) to increase the effective capacity and flexibility of communications satellites. This paper reviews the advantages of these OBP approaches and examines the efficacy of Moore’s Law and advanced signal processing architectures in reducing the costs of adopting processed communications payload systems.

[1]  Enrico Colzi,et al.  Performance Assessment of Output Sections of Satellite Flexible Payloads , 2008 .

[2]  N. V. Jespersen Satellite-based cellular communication , 2000 .

[3]  K. Wiemann,et al.  The ACeS digital channelizer-the next generation in regional digital satellite telephone communications , 2000, 19th DASC. 19th Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37126).

[4]  Eric Wiswell,et al.  Fast-packet vs circuit switch and bent pipe satellite network architectures , 1999, Int. J. Satell. Commun. Netw..

[5]  J.R. Marshall,et al.  Increasing Performance and Removing Bottlenecks in Reconfigurable Space Processing , 2007, 2007 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[6]  Douglas McKinnon Evaluation of Flexible Payload Technologies for Use in Conventional GEO Communications Satellites , 2008 .

[7]  Piero Angeletti,et al.  How Did Metcalfe's Law Affected Satellite Systems Architectures? , 2007 .

[8]  Riccardo De Gaudenzi,et al.  From "Bent Pipes" to "Software Defined Payloads": Evolution and Trends of Satellite Communications Systems , 2008 .

[9]  Takashi Iida,et al.  Regenerative process gain at the rain condition in the satellite communications link , 1998 .

[10]  G. Gallinaro,et al.  Beam hopping in multi-beam broadband satellite systems: System simulation and performance comparison with non-hopped systems , 2010, 2010 5th Advanced Satellite Multimedia Systems Conference and the 11th Signal Processing for Space Communications Workshop.

[11]  Jean-Didier Gayrard,et al.  Future trends in digital On-Board Processors for telecommunication satellites , 2007 .

[12]  Jean-Didier Gayrard,et al.  Flexible Satellites: A New Challenge for the Communication Satellite Industry , 2007 .