Solid-state reactive sintering mechanism for proton conducting ceramics

Abstract The recently developed solid-state reactive sintering (SSRS) method significantly simplifies the fabrication process for proton conducting ceramics by combining phase formation, densification, and grain growth into a single high-temperature sintering step. The fabrication simplicity provided by SSRS greatly enhances the potential for deployment of proton conducting ceramics in a number of electrochemical devices. Nevertheless, the mechanisms behind SSRS are still poorly understood. In this report, the SSRS mechanism is clarified through a systematic study of the effect of a suite of metal oxide sintering additives on the phase formation and densification of prototypical proton conducting ceramics BaCe 0.6 Zr 0.3 Y 0.1 O 3 − δ (BCZY63), BaCe 0.8 Y 0.2 O 3 − δ (BCY20), BaZr 0.8 Y 0.2 O 3 − δ (BZY20), and BaZr 0.9 Y 0.1 O 3 − δ (BZY10). Sintering additives with metal ions having a stable oxidation state of + 2 and an ionic radius similar to Zr 4 + (which easily occupy the Zr 4 + site of the BaZrO 3 perovskite structure, resulting in the formation of large amounts of defects) produce the best sinterability. Sintering additives with metal ions having multiple stable oxidation states (2 +, 3 +, 4 + etc.) and ionic radii near to Zr 4 + (which also readily occupy the Zr 4 + sites of BaZrO 3 perovskite structure, but form fewer amounts of defects) can result in partial sintering by the formation of mechanically stable highly-porous microstructures with limited grain sizes. Sintering additives with metal ions having stable oxidation states ≥ 3 + or ionic radii far from Zr 4 + are unlikely to form a solid solution with BaZrO 3 and yield no effect on sintering behavior (virtually identical to the control sample without any additives). These findings provide a useful guide for the selection of sintering additives to engineer optimal microstructures in proton conducting ceramics and may have potential consequences in other ceramic systems as well.

[1]  Sossina M. Haile,et al.  Enhanced Sintering of Yttrium‐Doped Barium Zirconate by Addition of ZnO , 2005 .

[2]  Y. Kiselev.  On matrix stabilisation of d- and f-transition metal ions in unstable oxidation states , 2009 .

[3]  Zongping Shao,et al.  Effect of Ba nonstoichiometry on the phase structure, sintering, electrical conductivity and phase s , 2011 .

[4]  S. Haile,et al.  Processing of yttrium-doped barium zirconate for high proton conductivity , 2007 .

[5]  J. O’Brien,et al.  Conductivity degradation of NiO-containing 8YSZ and 10YSZ electrolyte during reduction , 2009 .

[6]  Masaharu Hatano,et al.  Ba(Zr0.1Ce0.7Y0.2)O3–δ as an Electrolyte for Low‐Temperature Solid‐Oxide Fuel Cells , 2006 .

[7]  S. Licoccia,et al.  Design and fabrication of a chemically-stable proton conductor bilayer electrolyte for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells (IT-SOFCs) , 2008 .

[8]  R. O’Hayre,et al.  Proton-conducting yttrium-doped barium cerate ceramics synthesized by a cost-effective solid-state reactive sintering method , 2010 .

[9]  J. Irvine,et al.  Conductivity studies of dense yttrium-doped BaZrO3 sintered at 1325 °C , 2007 .

[10]  R. Gerbasi,et al.  High conductivity and chemical stability of BaCe1−x−yZrxYyO3−δ proton conductors prepared by a sol–gel method , 2008 .

[11]  Ryan O'Hayre,et al.  Solid-state reactive sintering mechanism for large-grained yttrium-doped barium zirconate proton conducting ceramics , 2010 .

[12]  Zhe Cheng,et al.  Enhanced Sulfur and Coking Tolerance of a Mixed Ion Conductor for SOFCs: BaZr0.1Ce0.7Y0.2–xYbxO3–δ , 2009, Science.

[13]  Emiliana Fabbri,et al.  Materials challenges toward proton-conducting oxide fuel cells: a critical review. , 2010, Chemical Society reviews.

[14]  J. Gale,et al.  Dopant and proton incorporation in perovskite-type zirconates , 1999 .

[15]  Ryan O'Hayre,et al.  Cost-effective solid-state reactive sintering method for high conductivity proton conducting yttrium-doped barium zirconium ceramics , 2010 .

[16]  L. Gauckler,et al.  Sintering of Nanocrystalline CeO2 Ceramics , 2001 .

[17]  Meilin Liu,et al.  Enhanced sinterability of BaZr0.1Ce0.7Y0.1Yb0.1O3−δ by addition of nickel oxide , 2011 .

[18]  J. Irvine,et al.  A Stable, Easily Sintered Proton‐ Conducting Oxide Electrolyte for Moderate‐Temperature Fuel Cells and Electrolyzers , 2006 .

[19]  R. D. Shannon.  Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides , 1976 .

[20]  S. Licoccia,et al.  A novel single chamber solid oxide fuel cell based on chemically stable thin films of Y-doped BaZrO3 proton conducting electrolyte , 2010 .

[21]  Emiliana Fabbri,et al.  High proton conduction in grain-boundary-free yttrium-doped barium zirconate films grown by pulsed laser deposition. , 2010, Nature materials.