The effects of initial lifting height, load magnitude, and lifting speed on the peak dynamic L5/S1 moments

The purpose of this study was to quantify the peak dynamic bending moments on the spine during sagittal plane lifting as a function of the load's initial height above the floor, the load's magnitude, and the lifting speed. Ten male subjects participated in a repeated measures experiment in which 24 lifts were performed. The boxes lifted by the subjects contained loads that were 20, 100, 200, and 300 N. The lifts originated from three vertical locations (7.5 cm or “floor” level, knee level, and knuckle level), and were lifted at two qualitatively defined lifting speeds (“normal” and “fast”). All lifts were symmetric about the body's mid-sagittal plane and the boxes were gripped with both hands using the handles. Kinetic and kinematic data were used in a “bottom-up” linked segment dynamic model to determine the peak sagittal bending moment experienced by the subjects during each lift. The peak moments were significantly greater when lifting from lower lift heights (p<0.001), at faster lifting speeds (p<0.001), and with heavier loads (p<0.001). Moreover, the peak moments were dependent upon the combination of these three factors. Based on these data, a regression model was developed to predict the peak dynamic moment given the load magnitude, the starting height, and a qualitative estimate of lifting speed. This model was then used to assess whether the current National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health's (NIOSH's) model can control the peak bending moments acting on the spine as the limits for safe lifting are adjusted according to changes in the initial lifting height. It was found that the current NIOSH guidelines under-represent the increased bimechanical load experienced during low-level lifting.

[1]  A Garg,et al.  Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. , 1993, Ergonomics.

[2]  H M Toussaint,et al.  The evaluation of a practical biomechanical model estimating lumbar moments in occupational activities. , 1994, Ergonomics.

[3]  W. G. Allread,et al.  The Role of Dynamic Three-Dimensional Trunk Motion in Occupationally-Related Low Back Disorders: The Effects of Workplace Factors, Trunk Position, and Trunk Motion Characteristics on Risk of Injury , 1993, Spine.

[4]  G. Andersson Epidemiology of Back Pain in Industry , 2003 .

[5]  O. Schipplein,et al.  The Influence of Initial Horizontal Weight Placement on the Loads at the Lumbar Spine While Lifting , 1995, Spine.

[6]  M. de Looze,et al.  Joint moments and muscle activity in the lower extremities and lower back in lifting and lowering tasks. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  R W Norman,et al.  Dynamically and statically determined low back moments during lifting. , 1985, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  T P Leskinen,et al.  Comparison of static and dynamic biomechanical models. , 1985, Ergonomics.

[9]  G. W. Bennett,et al.  Regression models for the prediction of dynamic L4/L5 compression forces during lifting , 1992 .

[10]  R W Norman,et al.  A simple polynomial that predicts low-back compression during complex 3-D tasks. , 1996, Ergonomics.

[11]  D B Chaffin,et al.  A longitudinal study of low-back pain as associated with occupational weight lifting factors. , 1973, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[12]  W. M. Keyserling,et al.  Back disorders and nonneutral trunk postures of automobile assembly workers. , 1991, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[13]  G B Andersson,et al.  Influence of body segment dynamics on loads at the lumbar spine during lifting. , 1992, Ergonomics.

[14]  John W. Frymoyer,et al.  The adult spine : principles and practice , 1991 .

[15]  G B Andersson,et al.  The effects of lifting speed on the peak external forward bending, lateral bending, and twisting spine moments. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[16]  M. Bergquist-Ullman,et al.  Acute low back pain in industry. A controlled prospective study with special reference to therapy and confounding factors. , 1977, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[17]  D B Chaffin,et al.  A dynamic biomechanical evaluation of lifting maximum acceptable loads. , 1984, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  T. Andriacchi,et al.  Relationship between moments at the L5/S1 level, hip and knee joint when lifting. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  G. Andersson,et al.  The epidemiology of spinal disorders , 1997 .

[20]  A. Schultz,et al.  Loads on the lumbar spine. Validation of a biomechanical analysis by measurements of intradiscal pressures and myoelectric signals. , 1982, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.