The interaction between predation and competition: a review and synthesis

This review discusses the interface between two of the most important types of interactions between species, interspecific competition and predation. Predation has been claimed to increase, decrease, or have little effect on, the strength, impact or importance of interspecific competition. There is confusion about both the meaning of these terms and the likelihood of, and conditions required for, each of these outcomes. In this article we distinguish among three measures of the influence of predation on competitive outcomes: short-term per capita consumption or growth rates, long-term changes in density, and the probability of competitive coexistence. We then outline various theoretical mechanisms that can lead to qualitatively distinct effects of predators. The qualitative effect of predators can depend both on the mechanism of competition and on the definition of competitive strength/impact. In assessing the empirical literature, we ask: (1) What definitions of competitive strength/impact have been assumed? (2) Does strong evidence exist to support one or more of the possible mechanisms that can produce a given outcome? (3) Do biases in the choice of organism or manipulation exist, and are they likely to have influenced the conclusions reached? We conclude by discussing several unanswered questions, and espouse a stronger interchange between empirical and theoretical approaches to this important question.

[1]  J. Shurin,et al.  Effects of Competition, Predation, and Dispersal on Species Richness at Local and Regional Scales , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[2]  T. Schoener,et al.  An experimental study of the effect of lizards on web-spider communities , 1988 .

[3]  R. Holt.  Density-independent mortality, non-linear competitive interactions, and species coexistence , 1985 .

[4]  L. V. Van Valen.  Predation and species diversity. , 1974, Journal of theoretical biology.

[5]  James P Grover,et al.  Stoichiometry, herbivory and competition for nutrients: simple models based on planktonic ecosystems. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[6]  W. Murdoch.  Switching in General Predators: Experiments on Predator Specificity and Stability of Prey Populations , 1969 .

[7]  Peter Chesson,et al.  MacArthur's consumer-resource model , 1990 .

[8]  J. Huisman,et al.  Biodiversity of plankton by species oscillations and chaos , 1999, Nature.

[9]  B. Menge,et al.  Species Diversity Gradients: Synthesis of the Roles of Predation, Competition, and Temporal Heterogeneity , 1976, The American Naturalist.

[10]  J. Diamond,et al.  Ecology and Evolution of Communities , 1976, Nature.

[11]  J. Connell.  The Influence of Interspecific Competition and Other Factors on the Distribution of the Barnacle Chthamalus Stellatus , 1961 .

[12]  David J. Augustine,et al.  Ungulate effects on the functional species composition of plant communities; herbivore selectivity and plant tolerance , 1998 .

[13]  L. V. Valen.  Predation and species diversity , 1974 .

[14]  Franz J. Weissing,et al.  BIOLOGICAL CONDITIONS FOR OSCILLATIONS AND CHAOS GENERATED BY MULTISPECIES COMPETITION , 2001 .

[15]  A. Mazumder,et al.  REVERSAL OF GRAZING IMPACT ON PLANT SPECIES RICHNESS IN NUTRIENT‐POOR VS. NUTRIENT‐RICH ECOSYSTEMS , 1998 .

[16]  P. Chesson,et al.  The forest architecture hypothesis for diversity maintenance. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[17]  D. J. Hall,et al.  AN EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH TO THE PRODUCTION DYNAMICS AND STRUCTURE OF FRESHWATER ANIMAL COMMUNITIES1 , 1970 .

[18]  P. Chesson.  Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity , 2000 .

[19]  P. Yodzis,et al.  Competition for Space and the Structure of Ecological Communities , 1978 .

[20]  Robert D. Holt,et al.  RESOLVING ECOLOGICAL QUESTIONS THROUGH META‐ANALYSIS: GOALS, METRICS, AND MODELS , 1999 .

[21]  A. D. de Roos,et al.  Impact of Intraguild Predation and Stage Structure on Simple Communities along a Productivity Gradient , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[22]  S. Peacor,et al.  PREDATOR EFFECTS ON AN ASSEMBLAGE OF CONSUMERS THROUGH INDUCED CHANGES IN CONSUMER FORAGING BEHAVIOR , 2000 .

[23]  Marcus W. Feldman,et al.  Species Packing and Predation Pressure , 1975 .

[24]  J. Grover.  Resource Competition , 1997, Population and Community Biology Series.

[25]  P. Abrams.  Character displacement and niche shift analyzed using consumer-resource models of competition. , 1986, Theoretical population biology.

[26]  Peter A Abrams,et al.  The Adaptive Dynamics of Consumer Choice , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[27]  R. May,et al.  Interspecific competition, predation and species diversity: a comment. , 1972, Journal of theoretical biology.

[28]  L. Slobodkin,et al.  Community Structure, Population Control, and Competition , 1960, The American Naturalist.

[29]  U. Sommer.  The impact of herbivore type and grazing pressure on benthic microalgal diversity , 1999 .

[30]  Burt P. Kotler,et al.  Predation and competition: the interaction of two types of species interactions , 1989 .

[31]  S. Diehl,et al.  Effects of Enrichment on Three‐Level Food Chains with Omnivory , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[32]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  Foraging trade‐offs and resource patchiness: theory and experiments with a freshwater snail community , 2001 .

[33]  D. Janzen.  Herbivores and the Number of Tree Species in Tropical Forests , 1970, The American Naturalist.

[34]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Competition in Field Experiments , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[35]  Peter A. Abrams,et al.  Effect of Increased Productivity on the Abundances of Trophic Levels , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[36]  C. Carroll,et al.  Effect of a Keystone Predaceous Ant, Solenopsis Geminata, on Arthropods in a Tropical Agroecosystem , 1982 .

[37]  M. Gilpin,et al.  Perturbation Experiments in Community Ecology: Theory and Practice , 1984 .

[38]  R. Lenski,et al.  The Relative Importance of Competition and Predation Varies with Productivity in a Model Community , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[39]  J. Lubchenco.  Plant Species Diversity in a Marine Intertidal Community: Importance of Herbivore Food Preference and Algal Competitive Abilities , 1978, The American Naturalist.

[40]  J. Roughgarden,et al.  THEORY OF MARINE COMMUNITIES: COMPETITION, PREDATION, AND RECRUITMENT-DEPENDENT INTERACTION STRENGTH , 1999 .

[41]  P. Hamilton,et al.  Experimental evidence for interactive impacts of human activities on lake algal species richness , 1996 .

[42]  M. Crawley.  Herbivory: the Dynamics of Animal-plant Interactions , 1984 .

[43]  R. Holt.  Predation, apparent competition, and the structure of prey communities. , 1977, Theoretical population biology.

[44]  Joseph H. Connell,et al.  Effects of Competition, Predation by Thais lapillus, and Other Factors on Natural Populations of the Barnacle Balanus balanoides , 1961 .

[45]  J. P. Grime,et al.  The effects of trophic structure and soil fertility on the assembly of plant communities: a microcosm experiment , 2000 .

[46]  David A. Spiller.  Consumptive-Competition Coefficients: An Experimental Analysis with Spiders , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[47]  R. Paine.  Food Web Complexity and Species Diversity , 1966, The American Naturalist.

[48]  James P. Grover,et al.  Simple Rules for Interspecific Dominance in Systems with Exploitative and Apparent Competition , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[49]  P. Abrams.  The Effect of Density‐Independent Mortality on the Coexistence of Exploitative Competitors for Renewing Resources , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[50]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  Plant tolerance and resistance in food webs: community-level predictions and evolutionary implications , 2000, Evolutionary Ecology.

[51]  Mathew A. Leibold,et al.  A Graphical Model of Keystone Predators in Food Webs: Trophic Regulation of Abundance, Incidence, and Diversity Patterns in Communities , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[52]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Immigration and the Maintenance of Local Species Diversity , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[53]  John H. Lawton,et al.  The Ecological Consequences of Shared Natural Enemies , 1994 .

[54]  James P. Grover,et al.  Assembly Rules for Communities of Nutrient-Limited Plants and Specialist Herbivores , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[55]  P. Hambäck.  Seasonality, Optimal Foraging, and Prey Coexistence , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[56]  J. Addicott.  Predation and Prey Community Structure: An Experimental Study of the Effect of Mosquito Larvae on the Protozoan Communities of Pitcher Plants , 1974 .

[57]  J. Wootton.  Putting the Pieces Together: Testing the Independence of Interactions among Organisms , 1994 .

[58]  P. Abrams.  How should resources be counted , 1988 .

[59]  John Vandermeer,et al.  Loose Coupling of Predator-Prey Cycles: Entrainment, Chaos, and Intermittency in the Classic Macarthur Consumer-Resource Equations , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[60]  C. Pfister.  Estimating Competition Coefficients from Census Data: A Test with Field Manipulations of Tidepool Fishes , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[61]  P. Abrams.  Consumer functional response and competition in consumer-resource systems. , 1980, Theoretical population biology.

[62]  Peter A. Abrams,et al.  Describing and quantifying interspecific interactions: a commentary on recent approaches , 2001 .

[63]  L. Slobodkin.  Growth and regulation of animal populations , 1962 .

[64]  P. Abrams.  Density-Independent Mortality and Interspecific Competition: A Test of Pianka's Niche Overlap Hypothesis , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[65]  S. Dodson,et al.  Predation, Body Size, and Composition of Plankton. , 1965, Science.

[66]  Peter A. Abrams,et al.  IS PREDATOR‐MEDIATED COEXISTENCE POSSIBLE INUNSTABLE SYSTEMS? , 1999 .

[67]  S. Levin.  Community Equilibria and Stability, and an Extension of the Competitive Exclusion Principle , 1970, The American Naturalist.

[68]  Hal Caswell,et al.  Predator-Mediated Coexistence: A Nonequilibrium Model , 1978, The American Naturalist.

[69]  Robert D. Holt,et al.  A Theoretical Framework for Intraguild Predation , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[70]  P. Abrams.  Resource partitioning and competition for shells between intertidal hermit crabs on the outer coast of Washington , 1987, Oecologia.

[71]  Robert A. Armstrong,et al.  Prey Species Replacement along a Gradient of Nutrient Enrichment: A Graphical Approach , 1979 .

[72]  Jonathan M. Chase.  Differential competitive interactions and the included niche : an experimental analysis with grasshoppers , 1996 .

[73]  Simon A. Levin,et al.  Stochastic Spatial Models: A User's Guide to Ecological Applications , 1994 .

[74]  David Claessen,et al.  Dwarfs and Giants: Cannibalism and Competition in Size‐Structured Populations , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[75]  I. Noy‐Meir.  Theoretical dynamics of competitors under predation , 1981, Oecologia.

[76]  Montgomery Slatkin,et al.  Competition and Regional Coexistence , 1974 .

[77]  J. R. Ott,et al.  Interspecific interactions in phytophagous insects : competition reexamined and resurrected , 1995 .

[78]  J. Grover.  Competition, Herbivory, and Enrichment: Nutrient-Based Models for Edible and Inedible Plants , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[79]  Joseph H. Connell,et al.  On the Prevalence and Relative Importance of Interspecific Competition: Evidence from Field Experiments , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[80]  Mark A. McPeek,et al.  Predation, Competition, and Prey Communities: A Review of Field Experiments , 1985 .

[81]  Thomas W. Schoener,et al.  Field Experiments on Interspecific Competition , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[82]  T. Schoener,et al.  LIZARDS REDUCE SPIDER SPECIES RICHNESS BY EXCLUDING RARE SPECIES , 1998 .

[83]  Robert D Holt,et al.  Spatial Heterogeneity, Indirect Interactions, and the Coexistence of Prey Species , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[84]  H. Godfray,et al.  Trade-off between parasitoid resistance and larval competitive ability in Drosophila melanogaster , 1997, Nature.

[85]  T. Case,et al.  Habitat structure determines competition intensity and invasion success in gecko lizards. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[86]  P. Chesson,et al.  The Roles of Harsh and Fluctuating Conditions in the Dynamics of Ecological Communities , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[87]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  The Interaction between Competition and Predation: A Meta‐analysis of Field Experiments , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[88]  J. Connell.  On the role of the natural enemies in preventing competitive exclusion in some marine animals and in rain forest trees , 1971 .

[89]  Jonathan M. Chase.  Food Web Effects of Prey Size Refugia: Variable Interactions and Alternative Stable Equilibria , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[90]  R. Holt,et al.  Disentangling Resource and Apparent Competition: Realistic Models for Plant-herbivore Communities , 1998 .

[91]  J. Lawton,et al.  Enemy free space and the structure of ecological communities , 1984 .

[92]  M. Lynch.  Predation, competition, and zooplankton community structure: An experimental study1,2 , 1979 .

[93]  J. Timothy Wootton,et al.  Effects of birds on sea urchins and algae: A lower-intertidal trophic cascade , 1995 .

[94]  R. Paine,et al.  Disturbance, patch formation, and community structure. , 1974, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[95]  High Competition with Low Similarity and Low Competition with High Similarity: Exploitative and Apparent Competition in Consumer‐Resource Systems , 1998, The American Naturalist.