A Reduced Dissipation Approach for Unsteady Flows on

A reduced dissipation approach is developed for and studied on unstructured grids using the BCFD code. The approach, termed bounded central dierencing, or BCD, acts in two ways to reduce the inherent dissipation in the Roe scheme on arbitrary meshes. The proposed BCD approach blends several recent low dissipation approaches and adjusts them for a greater deal of robustness on unstructured grids of arbitrary element type. BCFD typically uses least squares cell-based gradients whose stencil involves all node neighbors. These gradients have been shown to be overly dissipative for unsteady simulations. To lessen the dissipation in the BCD approach, the component of the derivative in the edge direction is replaced with 50% of the central dierence derivative based on the cell center data of the parent and face neighbor cells. Second, the Roe dissipation term is allowed to be decreased by an amount determined from the parameter fd from the Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation (DDES) method in combination with a wiggle detector and grid quality metric. This approach ensures that the simulation recovers the full Roe scheme in the RANS region, while allowing a more central-dierence -like behavior far from the walls where typically it is desired to resolve eddy structures. An important distinguishing factor of the current method is its attention to regions of poor grid quality. Performance of the approach is tested in decaying isotropic turbulence for dierent grid resolutions and two topologies, on a NACA 0021 airfoil, and on a typical commercial aircraft flap edge where acoustics are of concern. All test cases are compared to experimental data when available. In all cases, the BCD approach delivered favorable results and was shown to be robust across many grid types/resolutions.

[1]  Dimitri J. Mavriplis,et al.  Revisiting the Least-squares Procedure for Gradient Reconstruction on Unstructured Meshes , 2003 .

[2]  J. Palma,et al.  Numerical simulation of isotropic turbulence using a collocated approach and a nonorthogonal grid system , 2002 .

[3]  Frank Thiele,et al.  A STUDY OF GRID CONVERGENCE ISSUES FOR THE SIMULATION OF THE MASSIVELY SEPARATED FLOW AROUND A STALLED AIRFOIL USING DES AND RELATED METHODS , 2006 .

[4]  John Sheridan,et al.  Frequency analysis of surface pressures on an airfoil after stall , 2003 .

[5]  Edward N. Tinoco,et al.  Structured and Unstructured Navier-Stokes Solvers for the Third Drag Prediction Workshop , 2008 .

[6]  S. Corrsin,et al.  Simple Eulerian time correlation of full-and narrow-band velocity signals in grid-generated, ‘isotropic’ turbulence , 1971, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[7]  M. Strelets Detached eddy simulation of massively separated flows , 2001 .

[8]  Doyle Knight,et al.  Compressible large eddy simulation using unstructured grids , 1998 .

[9]  Marius Paraschivoiu,et al.  Self-Adaptive Upwinding for Large Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Flows on Unstructured Elements , 2009 .

[10]  Patrick Chassaing,et al.  Turbulence modelling improvement for highly detached unsteady aerodynamic flows by statistical and hybrid approaches , 2006 .

[11]  Philippe R. Spalart,et al.  Evaluation of Structured and Unstructured Grids for Detached Eddy Simulation of Flap Edge Noise , 2009 .

[12]  F. Menter,et al.  Development and Application of SST-SAS Turbulence Model in the DESIDER Project , 2008 .

[13]  Todd Simons,et al.  Large eddy simulation of turbulent flows using unstructured grids , 1998 .

[14]  P. Spalart,et al.  A hybrid RANS-LES approach with delayed-DES and wall-modelled LES capabilities , 2008 .

[15]  Siva Nadarajah,et al.  Detached-Eddy Simulation of a Wing Tip Vortex at Dynamic Stall Conditions , 2009 .

[16]  P. Spalart,et al.  A New Version of Detached-eddy Simulation, Resistant to Ambiguous Grid Densities , 2006 .

[17]  S. Corrsin,et al.  The use of a contraction to improve the isotropy of grid-generated turbulence , 1966, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[18]  K. Takeuchi On the prediction of the kurtosis of velocity derivatives in a turbulent field , 1979 .

[19]  C. Meneveau,et al.  Decaying turbulence in an active-grid-generated flow and comparisons with large-eddy simulation , 2003, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[20]  D. Youngs,et al.  Three-dimensional numerical simulation of turbulent mixing by Rayleigh-Taylor instability , 1991 .

[21]  John C. LaRue,et al.  The decay power law in grid-generated turbulence , 1990, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[22]  Edward N. Tinoco,et al.  Abridged Summary of the Third AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Drag Prediction Workshop , 2008 .

[23]  Mori Mani,et al.  A two-equation large eddy stress model for high sub-grid shear , 2001 .