Usability is the best policy: public policy and the lived experience of transport systems in London

This paper explores the relations between public policy and usability in lived experience, drawing on 3 case studies in one important area of urban policy, transport. For these studies, discourse from interviews and focus groups with a total of 120 participants, and a written corpus of over 80 documents, were collected and analyzed, together with interviews with 25 key staff and observations of user interactions both in the laboratory and in situ. The resulting rich dataset presents a new perspective on e-government systems in use. The results show that usability must be prioritised at the policy design stage; it cannot be left to implementation. Failure to do so is experienced by users in systems which fail to work together to meet their needs. Negative experiences, in turn, may lead to loss of trust and legitimacy, and detract from public value and community well-being. These findings, therefore, provide lessons from HCI insights for both public policy-makers and implementers of e-government systems. The paper concludes by suggesting some HCI methods for pre-venting usability problems in e-government systems, by involving users in design in order to understand their lived experiences around the ecology of the systems.

[1]  Juliet Jain Bypassing and WAPing: Reconfiguring timetables for real time mobility , 2006 .

[2]  Paul Dourish,et al.  On "Technomethodology": Foundational Relationships Between Ethnomethodology and System Design , 1998, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[3]  Patrick Dunleavy,et al.  Better public services through e-government: academic article in support of better public services through e-government , 2002 .

[4]  Alan Cooper,et al.  The Inmates Are Running the Asylum: Why High Tech Products Drive Us Crazy and How to Restore the Sanity (2nd Edition) , 1999 .

[5]  Joanna McGrenere,et al.  Affordances: Clarifying and Evolving a Concep , 2000, Graphics Interface.

[6]  J. Potter,et al.  Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour , 1987 .

[7]  N. Hoffart Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2000 .

[8]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication (Learning in Doing: Social, , 1987 .

[9]  Mitchell Kapor A software design manifesto , 1990 .

[10]  Michael Grimsley,et al.  e-Government information systems: Evaluation-led design for public value and client trust , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Interface: an evolving concept , 1993, CACM.

[12]  Roland Traunmüller,et al.  Electronic Government: Where Are We Heading? , 2002, EGOV.

[13]  Ann Blandford,et al.  User interface design as systems design , 2002 .

[14]  Colin Potts,et al.  Design of Everyday Things , 1988 .

[15]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Understanding computers and cognition - a new foundation for design , 1987 .

[16]  James H. Aylor,et al.  Computer for the 21st Century , 1999, Computer.

[17]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Ten Usability Heuristics , 2006 .

[18]  Andrew Dillon,et al.  Beyond usability: process, outcome and affect in human-computer interactions , 2001 .

[19]  David Banister,et al.  Critical pragmatism and congestion charging in London , 2003 .

[20]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Power, politics, and MIS implementation , 1987, CACM.

[21]  E. Deci,et al.  The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  Karen Ruhleder,et al.  Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[23]  William W. Gaver Technology affordances , 1991, CHI.

[24]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[25]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Through the Interface: A Human Activity Approach To User Interface Design , 1990 .

[26]  T. Brooks Information Ecologies: Using Technology with Heart , 1999 .

[27]  Andrew Dillon,et al.  Group Dynamics Meet Cognition: Combining Socio-Technical Concepts and Usability Engineering in the Design of Information Systems , 2000 .

[28]  R. Boland Information System Use as a Hermeneutic Process , 2002 .

[29]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Where the action is , 2001 .

[30]  Don Ihde Technics and praxis , 1978 .

[31]  Liam J. Bannon,et al.  Beyond the Interface: Encountering Artifacts in Use , 1989 .

[32]  R.I.A. Mercuri,et al.  Technology as Experience , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.