Dominance-based Rough Set Classifier without Induction of Decision Rules

Abstract Rough Sets Theory is often applied to the task of classification and prediction, in which objects are assigned to some pre-defined decision classes. When the classes are preference-ordered, the process of classification is referred to as sorting. To deal with the specificity of sorting problems an extension of the Classic Rough Sets Approach, called the Dominance-based Rough Sets Approach, was introduced. The final result of the analysis is a set of decision rules induced from what is called rough approximations of decision classes. The main role of the induced decision rules is to discover regularities in the analyzed data set, but the same rules, when combined with a particular classification method, may also be used to classify/sort new objects (i.e. to assign the objects to appropriate classes). There exist many different rule induction strategies, including induction of an exhaustive set of rules. This strategy produces the most comprehensive knowledge base on the analyzed data set, but it requires a considerable amount of computing time, as the complexity of the process is exponential. In this paper we present a shortcut that allows classifying new objects without generating the rules. The presented approach bears some resemblance to the idea of lazy learning.

[1]  C. Zopounidis Operational tools in the management of financial risks , 1997 .

[2]  R. Słowiński Intelligent Decision Support: Handbook of Applications and Advances of the Rough Sets Theory , 1992 .

[3]  Jan M. Zytkow,et al.  Handbook of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery , 2002 .

[4]  Ron Kohavi,et al.  Oblivious Decision Trees, Graphs, and Top-Down Pruning , 1995, IJCAI.

[5]  Robert Susmaga,et al.  Fast rule extraction with binary-coded relations , 2003, Intell. Data Anal..

[6]  David W. Aha,et al.  Special Issue on Lazy Learning , 1997 .

[7]  Jerzy W. Grzymala-Busse,et al.  LERS-A System for Learning from Examples Based on Rough Sets , 1992, Intelligent Decision Support.

[8]  Hung Son Nguyen,et al.  Scalable Classification Method Based on Rough Sets , 2002, Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing.

[9]  Andrzej Skowron,et al.  The Discernibility Matrices and Functions in Information Systems , 1992, Intelligent Decision Support.

[10]  Patrick Brézillon,et al.  Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence , 1999 .

[11]  Jerzy W. Grzymala-Busse,et al.  Rough Sets , 1995, Commun. ACM.

[12]  Salvatore Greco,et al.  A New Rough Set Approach to Multicriteria and Multiattribute Classification , 1998, Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing.

[13]  Z. Pawlak Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data , 1991 .

[14]  Arkadiusz Wojna,et al.  Local Attribute Value Grouping for Lazy Rule Induction , 2002, Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing.

[15]  Salvatore Greco,et al.  An Algorithm for Induction of Decision Rules Consistent with the Dominance Principle , 2000, Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing.

[16]  Roman Słowiński,et al.  A New Rough Set Approach to Evaluation of Bankruptcy Risk , 1998 .

[17]  Peter Clark,et al.  The CN2 Induction Algorithm , 1989, Machine Learning.

[18]  Jan G. Bazan Discovery of Decision Rules by Matching New Objects Against Data Tables , 1998, Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing.