3D margin assessment predicts local tumor progression after ablation of colorectal cancer liver metastases

OBJECTIVE To determine the feasibility and prognostic value of 3D measuring of the ablation margins using a dedicated image registration software. METHODS This retrospective study included 104 colorectal liver metastases in 68 consecutive patients that underwent microwave ablation between 08/2012 and 08/2019. The minimal ablation margin (MM) was measured in 2D using anatomic landmarks on contrast enhanced CT(CECT) 4-8 weeks post-ablation, and in 3D using an image registration software and immediate post-ablation CECT. Local tumor progression (LTP) was assessed by imaging up to 24 months after ablation. A blinded interventional radiologist provided feedback on the possibility of additional ablation after examining the 3D-margin measurements. RESULTS The 3D-margin assessment was completed in 79/104 (76%) tumors without the need for target manipulation. In 25/104 (24%) tumors, manipulation was required due to image misregistration. LTP was observed in 40/104 (38.5%) tumors: 92.5% vs 7.5% for those with margin <5mm vs ≥5mm, respectively (p = 0.0001). The 2D and 3D-assessments identified margin <5mm in 17/104 (16%), and in 74/104 (71%) ablated tumors, respectively (p < 0.01). The sensitivity and specificity of the 3D software for predicting LTP was 93% (37/40) and 42% (27/64), respectively. Additional ablation to achieve a MM of 5 mm would have been offered in 26/37 cases if the 3D-margin assessment was available intraoperatively. CONCLUSION Image registration software can measure ablation margins and detect MM under 5 mm intraoperatively, with significantly higher sensitivity than the 2D technique using landmarks on the post-ablation CECT. The identification of a margin under 5 mm is strongly associated with LTP.

[1]  K. Ahrar,et al.  Local tumour progression after percutaneous ablation of colorectal liver metastases according to RAS mutation status , 2017, The British journal of surgery.

[2]  Nobuhiko Hata,et al.  Three-dimensional quantitative assessment of ablation margins based on registration of pre- and post-procedural MRI and distance map , 2016, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[3]  Y. Shibayama,et al.  Clinicopathological analysis of recurrence patterns and prognostic factors for survival after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastasis , 2010, BMC surgery.

[4]  E. Ziv,et al.  Biopsy and Margins Optimize Outcomes after Thermal Ablation of Colorectal Liver Metastases , 2022, Cancers.

[5]  Luigi Solbiati,et al.  A novel software platform for volumetric assessment of ablation completeness , 2019, International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group.

[6]  M. Gönen,et al.  Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Biopsy of the Ablation Zone and Margins Can Be Used to Predict Oncologic Outcome. , 2016, Radiology.

[7]  K. Manova-Todorova,et al.  Fluorescent Tissue Assessment of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases Ablation Zone: A Potential Real-Time Biomarker of Complete Tumor Ablation , 2019, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[8]  J. Vauthey,et al.  Ablation of colorectal liver metastasis: Interaction of ablation margins and RAS mutation profiling on local tumour progression-free survival , 2018, European Radiology.

[9]  S. Nehmeh,et al.  Split-dose technique for FDG PET/CT-guided percutaneous ablation: a method to facilitate lesion targeting and to provide immediate assessment of treatment effectiveness. , 2013, Radiology.

[10]  S. Goldberg,et al.  Volumetric assessment of the periablational safety margin after thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases , 2021, European Radiology.

[11]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Local Recurrence After Hepatic Radiofrequency Coagulation: Multivariate Meta-Analysis and Review of Contributing Factors , 2005, Annals of surgery.

[12]  E. Ziv,et al.  Factors Associated With Local Tumor Control and Complications After Thermal Ablation of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: A 15-year Retrospective Cohort Study. , 2020, Clinical colorectal cancer.

[13]  M. Bottai,et al.  Microwave ablation versus resection for colorectal cancer liver metastases - A propensity score analysis from a population-based nationwide registry. , 2019, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[14]  W. Shi,et al.  Volumetric 3D assessment of ablation zones after thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases to improve prediction of local tumor progression , 2018, European Radiology.

[15]  M. Gonen,et al.  Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Factors Affecting Outcomes--A 10-year Experience at a Single Center. , 2016, Radiology.

[16]  E. Ziv,et al.  Immuno-Fluorescent Assessment of Ablated Colorectal Liver Metastases: The Frozen Section of Image-Guided Tumor Ablation? , 2021, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[17]  S. Weber,et al.  Volumetric Quantitative Ablation Margins for Assessment of Ablation Completeness in Thermal Ablation of Liver Tumors , 2021, Frontiers in Oncology.

[18]  Karen T. Brown,et al.  Margin Size is an Independent Predictor of Local Tumor Progression After Ablation of Colon Cancer Liver Metastases , 2013, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[19]  S. Park,et al.  A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis of Periprocedural Variables Affecting Local Tumor Progression after Radiofrequency Ablation of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases. , 2020, Radiology.

[20]  K. Brock,et al.  A novel use of biomechanical model-based deformable image registration (DIR) for assessing colorectal liver metastases ablation outcomes , 2021, Medical physics.

[21]  T. Vogl,et al.  Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria--a 10-year update. , 2014, Radiology.

[22]  R. Duran,et al.  Radiofrequency Ablation of Liver Tumors: No Difference in the Ablation Zone Volume Between Cirrhotic and Healthy Liver , 2018, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[23]  M. Gonen,et al.  Percutaneous Microwave versus Radiofrequency Ablation of Colorectal Liver Metastases: Ablation with Clear Margins (A0) Provides the Best Local Tumor Control. , 2017, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[24]  Luigi Solbiati,et al.  Small liver colorectal metastases treated with percutaneous radiofrequency ablation: local response rate and long-term survival with up to 10-year follow-up. , 2012, Radiology.

[25]  R. Günther,et al.  Radiofrequency Ablation of Liver Metastases—Software-Assisted Evaluation of the Ablation Zone in MDCT: Tumor-Free Follow-Up Versus Local Recurrent Disease , 2010, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.