Supporting reinterpretation in computer-aided conceptual design

This paper presents research that aims to inform the development of computational tools that better support design exploration and idea transformation - key objectives in conceptual design. Analyses of experimental data from two fields - product design and architecture - suggest that the interactions of designers with their sketches can be formalised according to a finite number of generalised shape rules defined within a shape grammar. Such rules can provide a basis for the generation of alternative design concepts and they have informed the development of a prototype shape synthesis system that supports dynamic reinterpretation of shapes in design activity. The notion of 'sub-shapes' is introduced and the significance of these to perception, recognition and the development of emergent structures is discussed. The paper concludes with some speculation on how such a system might find application in a range of design fields.

[1]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  A Micro Language: Generating MEMS Resonators by Using a Coupled Form — Function Shape Grammar , 2000 .

[2]  Scott Curland Chase,et al.  Sketching in design: formalising a transformational process , 2008 .

[3]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  On visual design thinking: the vis kids of architecture , 1994 .

[4]  M. Suwa.  Constructive perception: Coordinating perception and conception toward acts of problem-finding in a creative experience , 2003 .

[5]  Iestyn Jowers,et al.  Computation with Curved Shapes: Towards Freeform Shape Generation in Design , 2007 .

[6]  Mark Evans.  The integration of rapid prototyping within industrial design practice , 2002 .

[7]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing , 1992 .

[8]  Christine Alvarado,et al.  Designing a sketch recognition front-end: user perception of interface elements , 2007, SBIM '07.

[9]  Eric Saund,et al.  A perceptually-supported sketch editor , 1994, UIST '94.

[10]  Hau Hing Chau,et al.  EVALUATION OF A 3D SHAPE GRAMMAR IMPLEMENTATION , 2004 .

[11]  Masaki Suwa,et al.  What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? A protocol analysis , 1997 .

[12]  Bryan Lawson,et al.  How Designers Think , 1980 .

[13]  Michael Tovey,et al.  Drawing and CAD in industrial design , 1989 .

[14]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  Conceptual Design: An Operational Prescription for a Computer Support System , 2007, Computer Graphics, Imaging and Visualisation (CGIV 2007).

[15]  Scott Curland Chase,et al.  Categorisation of designs according to preference values for shape rules , 2008 .

[16]  George Stiny,et al.  Shape: Talking about Seeing and Doing , 2006 .

[17]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Descriptive models of creative design: application to an example , 1997 .

[18]  Mark D. Gross,et al.  Emergence in a Recognition Based Drawing Interface , 2001 .

[19]  Iestyn Jowers,et al.  Computer Aided Design: An Early Shape Synthesis System , 2008 .

[20]  H. Koning,et al.  The Language of the Prairie: Frank Lloyd Wright's Prairie Houses , 1981 .