In-vivo Experimental and Numerical Studies of Cardiac Flow in Right Atrium

The experimental and computational modes of determining cardiac flow are presented. In a computational fluid dynamics study, we attempt to simulate the physiological environment and flow conditions accurately in the right atrium. During the initial stage, we performed magnetic resonance imaging at multiple slices for chamber reconstruction and mesh refinements. A transient-state numerical simulation based on physiological data is developed. For our experimental approach, phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging of a selected slice of the heart is used to measure velocity of blood within the heart chamber in-vivo. This imaging technique can provide velocity maps to compare with the simulated flow. The velocity maps by the two methods are post-processed to generate vorticity maps for evaluation. Both experimental and computational results present the flow pattern of right atrial vortices with good agreement.

[1]  I. Marshall,et al.  Comparative Study of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Image-Based Computational Fluid Dynamics for Quantification of Pulsatile Flow in a Carotid Bifurcation Phantom , 2003, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  A. D. Gosman,et al.  Computational Flow Modeling of the Left Ventricle Based on In Vivo MRI Data: Initial Experience , 2001, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  M. H. Friedman,et al.  Relation between coronary artery geometry and the distribution of early sudanophilic lesions. , 1993, Atherosclerosis.

[4]  Ian Marshall,et al.  MRI measurement of time‐resolved wall shear stress vectors in a carotid bifurcation model, and comparison with CFD predictions , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[5]  Derek Abbott,et al.  Noninvasive Cardiac Flow Assessment Using High Speed Magnetic Resonance Fluid Motion Tracking , 2009, PloS one.

[6]  Derek Abbott,et al.  Cardiac Flow Analysis Applied to Phase Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Heart , 2009, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  R. Fimmers,et al.  Coronary MR angiography at 3.0 T versus that at 1.5 T: initial results in patients suspected of having coronary artery disease. , 2005, Radiology.

[8]  I. Marshall,et al.  Quantitative comparison of CFD predicted and MRI measured velocity fields in a carotid bifurcation phantom. , 2002, Biorheology.

[9]  Jiyuan Tu,et al.  Vortical flow analysis , 2010 .

[10]  J. Hennig,et al.  Time‐resolved 3D MR velocity mapping at 3T: Improved navigator‐gated assessment of vascular anatomy and blood flow , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  Zhonghua Sun,et al.  Multislice CT angiography in cardiac imaging. Part II: clinical applications in coronary artery disease. , 2010, Singapore medical journal.

[12]  Derek Abbott,et al.  Cardiac flow component analysis. , 2010, Medical engineering & physics.

[13]  G. S. Makin,et al.  Velocity of Blood Flow in Normal Human Venae Cavae , 1968 .

[14]  M. Yacoub,et al.  Asymmetric redirection of flow through the heart , 2000, Nature.

[15]  Laurence Vial,et al.  1 Title In vitro validation of computational fluid dynamics simulation in human proximal airways with hyperpolarized 3 He magnetic resonance phase-contrast velocimetry , 2007 .

[16]  I. Marshall,et al.  MRI and CFD studies of pulsatile flow in healthy and stenosed carotid bifurcation models. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  Quan Long,et al.  Combined CFD/MRI Analysis of Left Ventricular Flow , 2004, Medical Imaging and Augmented Reality.