Large-scale time-lapse microscopy of Oct4 expression in human embryonic stem cell colonies

Identification and quantification of the characteristics of stem cell preparations is critical for understanding stem cell biology and for the development and manufacturing of stem cell based therapies. We have developed image analysis and visualization software that allows effective use of time-lapse microscopy to provide spatial and dynamic information from large numbers of human embryonic stem cell colonies. To achieve statistically relevant sampling, we examined >680 colonies from 3 different preparations of cells over 5 days each, generating a total experimental dataset of 0.9 terabyte (TB). The 0.5 Giga-pixel images at each time point were represented by multi-resolution pyramids and visualized using the Deep Zoom Javascript library extended to support viewing Giga-pixel images over time and extracting data on individual colonies. We present a methodology that enables quantification of variations in nominally-identical preparations and between colonies, correlation of colony characteristics with Oct4 expression, and identification of rare events.

[1]  Anne L. Plant,et al.  An Automated Protocol for Performance Benchmarking a Widefield Fluorescence Microscope , 2015 .

[2]  Xi Chen,et al.  Reciprocal Transcriptional Regulation of Pou5f1 and Sox2 via the Oct4/Sox2 Complex in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2005, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[3]  Fabian J. Theis,et al.  Network plasticity of pluripotency transcription factors in embryonic stem cells , 2015, Nature Cell Biology.

[4]  Jennifer M. Bolin,et al.  Chemically defined conditions for human iPS cell derivation and culture , 2011, Nature Methods.

[5]  Donald W. Fink.  FDA Regulation of Stem Cell–Based Products , 2009, Science.

[6]  Debbie L C van den Berg,et al.  An Oct4-Centered Protein Interaction Network in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2010, Cell stem cell.

[7]  S. Legartová,et al.  Differentiation-independent fluctuation of pluripotency-related transcription factors and other epigenetic markers in embryonic stem cell colonies. , 2012, Stem cells and development.

[8]  J. Miyazaki,et al.  Quantitative expression of Oct-3/4 defines differentiation, dedifferentiation or self-renewal of ES cells , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[9]  Christine A. Wells,et al.  Single-Cell Gene Expression Profiles Define Self-Renewing, Pluripotent, and Lineage Primed States of Human Pluripotent Stem Cells , 2014, Stem cell reports.

[10]  G. Daley,et al.  Live cell imaging distinguishes bona fide human iPS cells from partially reprogrammed cells , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[11]  H. Schöler,et al.  Modulation of the Activity of Multiple Transcriptional Activation Domains by the DNA Binding Domains Mediates the Synergistic Action of Sox2 and Oct-3 on the Fibroblast Growth Factor-4Enhancer* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[12]  Rudolf Jaenisch,et al.  Molecular control of pluripotency. , 2006, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[13]  Megan F. Cole,et al.  Core Transcriptional Regulatory Circuitry in Human Embryonic Stem Cells , 2005, Cell.

[14]  Austin G Smith,et al.  Capturing Pluripotency , 2008, Cell.

[15]  M. Murakami,et al.  The Homeoprotein Nanog Is Required for Maintenance of Pluripotency in Mouse Epiblast and ES Cells , 2003, Cell.

[16]  G. Pan,et al.  A negative feedback loop of transcription factors that controls stem cell pluripotency and self‐renewal , 2006, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[17]  M. Model,et al.  A standard for calibration and shading correction of a fluorescence microscope. , 2001, Cytometry.

[18]  P. Robson,et al.  Transcriptional Regulation of Nanog by OCT4 and SOX2* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[19]  Matt Thomson,et al.  Pluripotency Factors in Embryonic Stem Cells Regulate Differentiation into Germ Layers , 2011, Cell.

[20]  John T Elliott,et al.  Cell cycle dependent TN‐C promoter activity determined by live cell imaging , 2011, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[21]  Tetsushi Sakuma,et al.  Stochastic promoter activation affects Nanog expression variability in mouse embryonic stem cells , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[22]  Hitoshi Niwa,et al.  How is pluripotency determined and maintained? , 2007, Development.

[23]  John T Elliott,et al.  An automated protocol for performance benchmarking a widefield fluorescence microscope , 2014, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[24]  J. Nichols,et al.  Functional Expression Cloning of Nanog, a Pluripotency Sustaining Factor in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2003, Cell.

[25]  Jennifer Nichols,et al.  A defined Oct4 level governs cell state transitions of pluripotency entry and differentiation into all embryonic lineages , 2013, Nature Cell Biology.

[26]  M. Baker.  Reprogramming: faithful reporters , 2012, Nature Methods.

[27]  James A. Thomson,et al.  Homologous recombination in human embryonic stem cells , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[28]  H. Ng,et al.  Reduced Oct4 Expression Directs a Robust Pluripotent State with Distinct Signaling Activity and Increased Enhancer Occupancy by Oct4 and Nanog , 2013, Cell stem cell.

[29]  David A Sivak,et al.  Transcription factor competition allows embryonic stem cells to distinguish authentic signals from noise. , 2015, Cell systems.

[30]  H. Schöler,et al.  Formation of Pluripotent Stem Cells in the Mammalian Embryo Depends on the POU Transcription Factor Oct4 , 1998, Cell.

[31]  Daniel Coca,et al.  Time-Lapse Analysis of Human Embryonic Stem Cells Reveals Multiple Bottlenecks Restricting Colony Formation and Their Relief upon Culture Adaptation , 2014, Stem cell reports.

[32]  K. Bhadriraju,et al.  Background intensity correction for terabyte‐sized time‐lapse images , 2015, Journal of microscopy.

[33]  Guangjin Pan,et al.  Nanog and transcriptional networks in embryonic stem cell pluripotency , 2007, Cell Research.

[34]  W. Cui,et al.  Stably Transfected Human Embryonic Stem Cell Clones Express OCT4‐Specific Green Fluorescent Protein and Maintain Self‐Renewal and Pluripotency , 2005, Stem cells.

[35]  Michael B. Elowitz,et al.  Dynamic Heterogeneity and DNA Methylation in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2014, Molecular cell.

[36]  Gabriel Kolle,et al.  A Continuum of Cell States Spans Pluripotency and Lineage Commitment in Human Embryonic Stem Cells , 2009, PloS one.