Patient doses from fluoroscopically guided cardiac procedures in pediatrics

Infants and children are a higher risk population for radiation cancer induction compared to adults. Although some values on pediatric patient doses for cardiac procedures have been reported, data to determine reference levels are scarce, especially when compared to those available for adults in diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. The aim of this study is to make a new contribution to the scarce published data in pediatric cardiac procedures and help in the determination of future dose reference levels. This paper presents a set of patient dose values, in terms of air kerma area product (KAP) and entrance surface air kerma (ESAK), measured in a pediatric cardiac catheterization laboratory equipped with a biplane x-ray system with dynamic flat panel detectors. Cardiologists were properly trained in radiation protection. The study includes 137 patients aged between 10 days and 16 years who underwent diagnostic catheterizations or therapeutic procedures. Demographic data and technical details of the procedures were also gathered. The x-ray system was submitted to a quality control programme, including the calibration of the transmission ionization chamber. The age distribution of the patients was 47 for <1 year; 52 for 1-<5 years; 25 for 5-<10 years and 13 for 10-<16 years. Median values of KAP were 1.9, 2.9, 4.5 and 15.4 Gy cm(2) respectively for the four age bands. These KAP values increase by a factor of 8 when moving through the four age bands. The probability of a fatal cancer per fluoroscopically guided cardiac procedure is about 0.07%. Median values of ESAK for the four age bands were 46, 50, 56 and 163 mGy, which lie far below the threshold for deterministic effects on the skin. These dose values are lower than those published in previous papers.

[1]  J. F. Keane,et al.  Diagnostic and Interventional Catheterization in Congenital Heart Disease , 1987, Springer US.

[2]  B Geiger,et al.  Dynamic flat panel detector versus image intensifier in cardiac imaging: dose and image quality , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  I. McLean,et al.  Comparative evaluation of an II based and a flat panel based cardiovascular fluoroscopy system within a clinical environment , 2005, Australasian Physics & Engineering Sciences in Medicine.

[4]  B. Wall,et al.  Revised radiation doses for typical X-ray examinations. Report on a recent review of doses to patients from medical X-ray examinations in the UK by NRPB. National Radiological Protection Board. , 1997, The British journal of radiology.

[5]  D. Blanc,et al.  European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images , 1998 .

[6]  J. Geleijns,et al.  Monte Carlo calculations for assessment of radiation dose to patients with congenital heart defects and to staff during cardiac catheterizations. , 2003, The British journal of radiology.

[7]  B. Wall,et al.  Reference Doses and Patient Size in Paediatric Radiology , 2001 .

[8]  S. McFadden,et al.  X-ray dose and associated risks from radiofrequency catheter ablation procedures. , 2002, The British journal of radiology.

[9]  D. Dance,et al.  Conversion factors for the estimation of effective dose in paediatric cardiac angiography , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  Martin Spahn,et al.  Flat detectors and their clinical applications , 2005, European Radiology.

[11]  V. Sluming,et al.  Radiation exposure to children during cardiac catheterization. , 1997, The British journal of radiology.

[12]  K. Faulkner,et al.  The impact of cardiology on the collective effective dose in the North of England. , 1997, The British journal of radiology.

[13]  R. H. Hernández Antolín,et al.  [Spanish Registry of Cardiac Catheterization and Coronary Interventions. Thirteenth Official Report of the Working Group on Cardiac Catheterization and Interventional Cardiology of the Spanish Society of Cardiology (1990-2003)]. , 2004, Revista espanola de cardiologia.

[14]  J Zoetelief,et al.  Dose conversion coefficients for interventional procedures. , 2005, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[15]  Virginia Tsapaki,et al.  Dose performance evaluation of a charge coupled device and a flat-panel digital fluoroscopy system recently installed in an interventional cardiology laboratory. , 2004, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[16]  W. Mortensson,et al.  Estimating the effective dose to children undergoing heart investigations--a phantom study. , 1999, The British journal of radiology.

[18]  J. Valentin,et al.  Abstract: Avoidance of radiation injuries from medical interventional procedures, ICRP Publication 85 , 2000 .

[19]  E. Vano,et al.  Preliminary reference levels in interventional cardiology , 2003, European Radiology.

[20]  Madan M. Rehani,et al.  Training of interventional cardiologists in radiation protection--the IAEA's initiatives. , 2007, International journal of cardiology.

[21]  R. López-Palop,et al.  Registro Español de Hemodinámica y Cardiología Intervencionista. XIII Informe Oficial de la Sección de Hemodinámica y Cardiología Intervencionista de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología (1990-2003) , 2004 .

[22]  H. Bosmans,et al.  Patient Dosimetry for X Rays Used in Medical Imaging , 2005, Journal of the ICRU.

[23]  Icrp.  Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication 60 , 1991 .

[24]  J. Valentine,et al.  Preface, Main Points, Chapters 1–6 , 2004 .

[25]  Jack Valentin,et al.  Managing patient dose in digital radiology , 2004 .

[26]  K. Sullivan,et al.  Quantifying and Minimizing Radiation Exposure During Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization , 2004, Pediatric Cardiology.

[27]  J Rassow,et al.  Effective doses to patients from paediatric cardiac catheterization. , 2000, The British journal of radiology.

[28]  D. Holmes,et al.  Flat‐panel detectors in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: Revolution or evolution—what are the issues? , 2004, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[29]  H. Thierens,et al.  Patient-Specific Dose and Radiation Risk Estimation in Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization , 2005, Circulation.

[30]  R. Sievert,et al.  Book Reviews : Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (as amended 1959 and revised 1962). I.C.R.P. Publication 6. 70 pp. PERGAMON PRESS. Oxford, London and New York, 1964. £1 5s. 0d. [TB/54] , 1964 .