Investigation of the effects of bandwidth and time delay on helicopter roll-axis handling qualities

Several years of cooperative research conducted under the U.S./German Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) in helicopter aeromechanics have recently resulted in a successful handling qualities study. The focus of this cooperative research has been the effect of time delays in a high bandwidth vehicle on handling qualities. The jointly performed study included the use of U.S. ground-based simulation and German in-flight simulation facilities. The NASA-Ames Vertical Motion Simulator (VMS) was used to develop a high bandwidth slalom tracking task which took into consideration the constraints of the facilities. The VMS was used to define a range of the test parameters and to perform initial handling qualities evaluations. The flight tests were conducted using DLR's variable-stability BO 105 S3 Advanced Technology Testing Helicopter System (ATTHeS). Configurations included a rate command and an attitude command response system with added time delays of up to 160 milliseconds over the baseline and band width values between 1.5 and 4.5 rad/sec. Sixty-six evaluations were performed in about 25 hours of flight time during ten days of testing. The results indicate a need to more tightly constrain the allowable roll axis phase delay for the Level 1 and Level 2 requirements in the U.S. Army's specification for helicopter handling qualities Aeronautical Design Standard (ADS)-33C.

[1]  L. D. Corliss,et al.  A helicopter flight investigation of roll-control sensitivity, damping and cross coupling in a low altitude lateral maneuvering task , 1983 .

[2]  W. von Grünhagen,et al.  ATTHeS In-Flight Simulator for Flying Qualities Research. , 1991 .

[3]  W. von Grünhagen,et al.  Handling Qualities Evaluation for Highly Augmented Helicopters. , 1990 .

[4]  William A. Decker,et al.  A piloted simulation investigation of yaw dynamics requirements for turreted gun use in low-level helicopter air combat , 1988 .

[5]  Mark B. Tischler,et al.  Applications of flight control system methods to an advanced combat rotorcraft , 1989 .

[6]  Ronald A. Hess,et al.  Study of Helicopter Roll Control Effectiveness Criteria. , 1986 .

[7]  Robert T. N. Chen,et al.  A piloted simulation of helicopter air combat to investigate effects of variations in selected performance and control response characteristics , 1987 .

[8]  J. Kaletka,et al.  Identification of Mathematical Derivative Models for the Design of a Model Following Control System , 1989 .

[9]  Ezra S. Krendel,et al.  Mathematical Models of Human Pilot Behavior , 1974 .

[10]  Sterling Federal Systems,et al.  A Piloted Simulation Investigation of Pitch and Roll Handling Qualities Requirements for Air-to-Air Combat , 1992 .

[11]  David G. Mitchell,et al.  Simulation investigation of the effects of helicopter hovering dynamics on pilot performance , 1990 .

[12]  David G. Mitchell,et al.  Flight investigation of helicopter low-speed response requirements , 1989 .

[13]  R. M. Gerdes,et al.  The effects of pilot stress factors on handling quality assessments during US/German helicopter agility flight tests , 1982 .

[14]  H.-J. Pausder.  A Study of Roll Response Required in a Low Altitude Slalom Task. , 1990 .

[15]  George E. Cooper,et al.  The use of pilot rating in the evaluation of aircraft handling qualities , 1969 .

[16]  David G. Mitchell,et al.  Proposed MIL Standard and Handbook - Flying Qualities of Air Vehicles. Volume 2. Proposed MIL Handbook , 1982 .

[17]  Matthew S. Whalley,et al.  Development and Evaluation of an Inverse Solution Technique for Studying Helicopter Maneuverability and Agility , 1991 .

[18]  Mark B. Tischler,et al.  Frequency-Response Method for Rotorcraft System Identification: Flight Applications to BO 105 Coupled Rotor/Fuselage Dynamics , 1992 .