Relation of human papilloma virus status to cervical lesions and consequences for cervical-cancer screening: a prospective study

BACKGROUND A relation has been established between infection with high-risk types of human papillomavirus and development of cervical cancer. We investigated a role for testing for human papillomavirus as part of cervical-cancer screening. METHODS We monitored by cytology, colposcopy, and testing for high-risk human papillomavirus 353 women referred to gynaecologists with mild to moderate and severe dyskaryosis. The median follow-up time was 33 months. At the last visit we took biopsy samples. Our primary endpoint was clinical progression, defined as cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 3, covering three or more cervical quadrants on colposcopy, or a cervical-smear result of suspected cervical cancer. FINDINGS 33 women reached clinical progression. All had persistent infection with high-risk human papillomavirus. The cumulative 6-year incidence of clinical progression among these women was 40% (95% CI 21-59). In women with end histology CIN 3, 98 (95%) of 103 had persistent infection with high-risk human papillomavirus from baseline. Among women with mild to moderate dyskaryosis at baseline, a second test for human papillomavirus at 6 months predicted end histology CIN 3 better than a second cervical smear. INTERPRETATION Persistent infection with high-risk human papillomavirus is necessary for development and maintenance of CIN 3. All women with severe dyskaryosis should be referred to gynaecologists, whereas women with mild to moderate dyskaryosis should be referred only after a second positive test for high-risk human papillomavirus at 6 months.

[1]  T. Wright,et al.  Precancerous Lesions of the Cervix , 1994 .

[2]  Jorma Paavonen,et al.  A cohort study of the risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 in relation to papillomavirus infection. , 1992 .

[3]  J. Walboomers,et al.  HPV typing and testing in gynaecological pathology: has the time come? , 1998, Histopathology.

[4]  C. de Wolf,et al.  New developments in cervical cancer screening and prevention. Geneva, Switzerland, June 17-19 1996. Workshop. , 1996, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[5]  H. Fox,et al.  Haines and Taylor obstetrical and gynaecological pathology , 1987 .

[6]  P. Kenemans,et al.  Observer agreement on interpreting colposcopic images of CIN. , 1995, Gynecologic oncology.

[7]  L. Koss The Papanicolaou test for cervical cancer detection. A triumph and a tragedy. , 1989, JAMA.

[8]  J. Cuzick Human papillomavirus testing for primary cervical cancer screening. , 2000, JAMA.

[9]  C. Meijer,et al.  The use of general primers GP5 and GP6 elongated at their 3' ends with adjacent highly conserved sequences improves human papillomavirus detection by PCR. , 1995, The Journal of general virology.

[10]  Y. van der Graaf,et al.  The effectiveness of cervical screening: a population-based case-control study. , 1988, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[11]  Julian Peto,et al.  Prevalence of Human Papillomavirus in Cervical Cancer: a Worldwide Perspective , 1995 .

[12]  V. Kataja,et al.  Prognostic factors in cervical human papillomavirus infections. , 1991 .

[13]  C. Meijer,et al.  A general primer GP5+/GP6(+)-mediated PCR-enzyme immunoassay method for rapid detection of 14 high-risk and 6 low-risk human papillomavirus genotypes in cervical scrapings , 1997, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[14]  F. X. Bosch,et al.  Risk factors for cervical cancer in Thailand: a case-control study. , 1998, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[15]  P. Kenemans,et al.  Positive predictive rate of colposcopic examination of the cervix uteri: an overview of literature. , 1998, Obstetrical & gynecological survey.

[16]  L. Brinton,et al.  The epidemiology of cervical carcinogenesis , 1995, Cancer.

[17]  J. Cuzick,et al.  Human papillomavirus testing in primary cervical screening , 1995, The Lancet.

[18]  Vooijs Gp Recommendations in aberrant findings of cytological studies of the cervix uteri , 1987 .

[19]  R. Burk,et al.  Persistent genital human papillomavirus infection as a risk factor for persistent cervical dysplasia. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[20]  R. Burk,et al.  Natural history of cervicovaginal papillomavirus infection in young women , 1998 .

[21]  Malcolm C. Anderson Premalignant and malignant squamous lesions of the cervix , 1995 .

[22]  R. Richart,et al.  A follow-up study of patients with cervical dysplasia. , 1969, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[23]  S Wacholder,et al.  Epidemiologic evidence showing that human papillomavirus infection causes most cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. , 1993, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[24]  F. X. Bosch,et al.  Causes of cervical cancer in the Philippines: a case-control study. , 1998, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[25]  C. Meijer,et al.  The presence of persistent high‐risk hpv genotypes in dysplastic cervical lesions is associated with progressive disease: Natural history up to 36 months , 1995, International journal of cancer.

[26]  David R. Scott,et al.  Determinants of Genital Human Papillomavirus Infection in Low‐Risk Women in Portland, Oregon , 1993, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[27]  H. J. Kwikkel,et al.  The accuracy of colposcopically directed biopsy in diagnosis of CIN. , 1987, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[28]  M. Sherman,et al.  Human papillomavirus—the most significant risk determinant of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia , 1996 .

[29]  J. Peto,et al.  Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide , 1999, The Journal of pathology.