Like a snowball: Adding layers of knowledge Enchanting student work with student input

Internet of Things (IoT) seems to be a popular term nowadays, for business, society and teaching alike. Teaching students about such concepts and more importantly, making them aware of the many competency components (often called KSA — knowledge, skills, abilities) required in the development of IoT systems, services and products has been a major aim in the teaching design presented in this paper. The snowball metaphor symbolizes added layers of input, comments and suggestions delivered by Belgian, Swedish and Chinese students respectively, to peers with different backgrounds (study level, subject major, etc.). Open-platform exercises using Arduino kits are used as starting points and reports. Conceptualizations and suggestions are carried through the snowball “chain”, which ends nearly two years later. Knowledge components are delivered e.g. through lectures. Among skills developed are practice in receiving input from and delivering output to groups different also in culture, knowledge, etc. Abilities include a demonstrated (and graded) proficiency in combining the acquired set of components, as demonstrated in workshops, discussions and reports, and in a proposed feedback loop to Sweden from China (not yet implemented).

[1]  Torben E. Svane Get your students to SMILE!: Exploring emerging interaction technologies , 2013, 2013 12th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET).

[2]  Thomas M. Duffy,et al.  Problem Based Learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework , 1995 .

[3]  D. Krathwohl A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview , 2002 .

[4]  Edward F. Crawley,et al.  Creating the CDIO Syllabus, a universal template for engineering education , 2002, 32nd Annual Frontiers in Education.

[5]  Yves Pigneur,et al.  Business Model Generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers and challengers , 2010 .

[6]  T. Svane,et al.  Knowledge by user demand and self-reflection: new models for teaching and assessment in edutainment software design , 2001, 31st Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Impact on Engineering and Science Education. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37193).

[7]  Kristina Edström,et al.  PBL and CDIO: complementary models for engineering education development , 2014 .

[8]  Simone C. dos Santos,et al.  A systems approach to managing learning based on Bloom's revised taxonomy to support student assessment in PBL , 2013, 2013 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).

[9]  Sabine Fließ,et al.  Commentary essay on “blueprinting the service company – managing service processes efficiently” , 2004, Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science.

[10]  Peter Dolog,et al.  Assessing Problem-Based Learning in a Software Engineering Curriculum Using Bloom’s Taxonomy and the IEEE Software Engineering Body of Knowledge , 2016, ACM Trans. Comput. Educ..

[11]  Mike Kuniavsky,et al.  User Experience and Hci , 2007 .