Indicators of ecosystem service potential at European scales: Mapping marginal changes and trade-offs

Abstract This study develops an approach to mapping indicators of the potential of ecosystems to supply ecosystem services, and the impact of changes in land cover and use upon them. The study focuses on the EU-25 plus Switzerland and Norway, and develops the methodology proposed by Kienast et al. (2009) , which uses expert-and literature-driven modelling methods. The methods are explored in relation to mapping and assessing four of the ecosystem services: “Crop-based production”; “Wildlife products”; “Habitat diversity”; and “Recreation”. The potential to deliver services is assumed to be influenced by (a) land-use, (b) net primary production, and (c) bioclimatic and landscape properties such as mountainous terrain, adjacency to coastal and wetland ecosystems, as well as adjacency to landscape and nature protection zones. The novel aspect of this work is an analysis of whether the historical and the projected land use changes for the periods 1990–2000, 2000–2006, and 2000–2030 are likely to be supportive or degenerative in the capacity of ecosystems to deliver ecosystem services; we refer to these as ‘marginal’ or incremental changes. The latter are assessed by using land account data for 1990–2000 and 2000–2006 (LEAC, EEA, 2006 ) and EURURALIS 2.0 land use scenarios for 2000–2030. The results are reported at three spatial reporting units, i.e. (1) the NUTS-X regions, (2) the bioclimatic regions, and (3) the dominant landscape types. All mapped output has been compared with independently generated continent-wide assessments (maps of ecosystem services or environmental parameters/indicators), which revealed that the straightforward binary links work satisfactorily and generate plausible geographical patterns. This conclusion mainly holds for provisioning services. At the continental scale, the selected input parameters are thus valid proxies which can be used to assess the medium-term potential of landscapes to provide ecosystem services. For a subset of NUTS-x regions for which change trajectories for 1990–2000, 2000–2006 and 2000–2030 are available, trade-offs between the four services have been analyzed using cluster analyses. The latter allowed us to simultaneously analyze the state of the four services in year 2000 and the individual trajectories of each service over three time periods. As a result we obtained seven regions with distinct trade-off patterns. To our knowledge this is one of the first continental-wide analyses where land use trajectories are taken into account to construct an indicator to estimate the balance between a set or bundle of ecosystem services. The relationship between the outputs of this work and the development of rapid assessment and accounting frameworks is discussed.

[1]  Stephen Polasky,et al.  Mapping and Valuing Ecosystem Services as an Approach for Conservation and Natural‐Resource Management , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[2]  B. Eickhout,et al.  The impact of different policy environments on agricultural land use in Europe , 2006 .

[3]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Scenarios for Ecosystem Services: An Overview , 2006 .

[4]  B. Eickhout,et al.  A multi-scale, multi-model approach for analyzing the future dynamics of European land use , 2008 .

[5]  Deborah G. Mayo,et al.  Methodology in Practice: Statistical Misspecification Testing , 2004, Philosophy of Science.

[6]  R. Costanza,et al.  Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making , 2009 .

[7]  Alexis J. Comber,et al.  Land use or land cover? , 2008 .

[8]  Jianguo Wu,et al.  Linking Land-use Change with Ecosystem Processes: A Hierarchical Patch Dynamic Model , 2003 .

[9]  Wilhelm Windhorst,et al.  Landscapes' Capacities to Provide Ecosystem Services - a Concept for Land-Cover Based Assessments , 2009 .

[10]  R. Cowling,et al.  An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  W. Cramer,et al.  A spatially explicit and quantitative vulnerability assessment of ecosystem service change in Europe , 2008 .

[12]  J. Bakkes,et al.  Scenario development to explore the future of Europe's rural areas , 2006 .

[13]  P. S. Bindrabana,et al.  Land quality indicators for sustainable land management : proposed method for yield gap and soil nutrient balance , 2000 .

[14]  G. Daily,et al.  Natural Capital: Theory and Practice of Mapping Ecosystem Services , 2011 .

[15]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  Valuing Changes in Ecosystem Services: Scenario Analyses , 2011 .

[16]  Iris Heller,et al.  Assessing Landscape Functions with Broad-Scale Environmental Data: Insights Gained from a Prototype Development for Europe , 2009, Environmental management.

[17]  G. Daily,et al.  Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales , 2009 .

[18]  Alex Hagen-Zanker,et al.  Map comparison methods that simultaneously address overlap and structure , 2006, J. Geogr. Syst..

[19]  Pamela A Matson,et al.  Ecosystem services: From theory to implementation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  E. Szerencsits,et al.  Evaluating the ecological sustainability of Austrian agricultural landscapes—the SINUS approach , 2004 .

[21]  J. Aronson,et al.  The economics of valuing ecosystem services and biodiversity , 2010 .

[22]  Gretchen C Daily,et al.  Conservation Planning for Ecosystem Services , 2006, PLoS biology.

[23]  F. Müller,et al.  Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets , 2012 .

[24]  Pete Smith,et al.  UK National Ecosystem Assessment:Technical report , 2011 .

[25]  Benjamin Burkhard,et al.  Flood regulating ecosystem services—Mapping supply and demand, in the Etropole municipality, Bulgaria , 2012 .

[26]  Nicola Fohrer,et al.  Assessment of the effects of land use patterns on hydrologic landscape functions: development of sustainable land use concepts for low mountain range areas , 2005 .

[27]  Maosheng Zhao,et al.  Improvements of the MODIS terrestrial gross and net primary production global data set , 2005 .

[28]  Tõnu Mauring,et al.  Estimation of Landscape Potential for Construction of Surface-Flow Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment in Estonia , 2007, Environmental management.

[29]  R. Haines-Young,et al.  Ecosystem Ecology: The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being , 2010 .

[30]  M. Rounsevell,et al.  Scenario-based studies of future land use in Europe , 2006 .

[31]  R. D. Groot,et al.  Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes , 2006 .

[32]  Roy Haines-Young,et al.  Land use and biodiversity relationships , 2009 .

[33]  Malte Busch,et al.  Potentials of quantitative and qualitative approaches to assessing ecosystem services , 2012 .

[34]  Arie C. Seijmonsbergen,et al.  A new symbol and GIS based detailed geomorphological mapping system: renewal of a scientific discipline for understanding landscape development , 2006 .

[35]  M. B. Beck,et al.  On the problem of model validation for predictive exposure assessments , 1997 .

[36]  Bai-Lian Li,et al.  Modeling landscape functions and effects: a network approach , 2000 .

[37]  L. Hein,et al.  Spatial characterization of landscape functions , 2008 .

[38]  P. Kareiva,et al.  An ecosystem services framework to support both practical conservation and economic development , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  Hao Chen,et al.  Components of information for multiple resolution comparison between maps that share a real variable , 2008, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[40]  Kurt Jax,et al.  Function and “functioning” in ecology: what does it mean? , 2005 .

[41]  R. D. de Groot,et al.  Ecosystem services and economic theory: integration for policy-relevant research. , 2008, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[42]  J. Boyd,et al.  What are Ecosystem Services? The Need for Standardized Environmental Accounting Units , 2006 .

[43]  Ralf Seppelt,et al.  Form follows function? Proposing a blueprint for ecosystem service assessments based on reviews and case studies , 2012 .

[44]  Subhrajit Guhathakurta Integrated Land Use and Environmental Models , 2003 .

[45]  Felix Kienast,et al.  Landscape functions in a changing environment. , 2010 .

[46]  D. Richardson,et al.  Mapping ecosystem services for planning and management , 2008 .

[47]  Millenium Ecosystem Assessment Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis , 2005 .

[48]  Nanjing Environmental assessment report , 2003 .

[49]  Stephen Polasky,et al.  Assessing multiple ecosystem services: an integrated tool for the real world: Theory and Practice of Mapping Ecosystem Services, , 2011 .

[50]  M. Rounsevell,et al.  The vulnerability of ecosystem services to land use change , 2006 .

[51]  P. Verburg,et al.  Trajectories of land use change in Europe: a model-based exploration of rural futures , 2010, Landscape Ecology.

[52]  Hans Visser,et al.  The Map Comparison Kit , 2006, Environ. Model. Softw..

[53]  Paracchini Maria-Luisa,et al.  A European assessment of the provision of ecosystem services - Towards an atlas of ecosystem services , 2011 .

[54]  O. Bastian,et al.  Ecosystem properties, potentials and services – The EPPS conceptual framework and an urban application example , 2012 .

[55]  Marco Neubert,et al.  Changes to Central European landscapes—Analysing historical maps to approach current environmental issues, examples from Saxony, Central Germany , 2007 .

[56]  R. DeFries,et al.  Anthropogenic Drivers of Ecosystem Change: an Overview , 2006 .

[57]  R. Haines-Young,et al.  Ecosystem Services : Exploring a Geographical Perspective , 2022 .

[58]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[59]  Thomas Childs Cochran I. The Problem , 1959 .

[60]  Antonio Di Gregorio,et al.  Parametric land cover and land-use classifications as tools for environmental change detection , 2002 .

[61]  Patrick ten Brink,et al.  The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity in National and International Policy Making , 2012 .

[62]  Georgina M. Mace,et al.  Economic Analysis for Ecosystem Service Assessments , 2011 .

[63]  R. Costanza,et al.  Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[64]  Martin Volk,et al.  Landscape Balance and Landscape Assessment , 2001 .

[65]  H. Haberl,et al.  Linking pattern and process in cultural landscapes. An empirical study based on spatially explicit indicators , 2004 .